Connect with us

Tech

Judge Stops Short of Forcing Google to Sell Chrome in Antitrust Case

Published

on

A U.S. federal judge has ruled that Google will not be required to sell its Chrome browser, despite finding the company guilty of illegally maintaining a monopoly in online search. The decision, delivered Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in a 226-page order, imposes restrictions on some of Google’s practices but rejects the government’s bid for a broader breakup of the tech giant.

The ruling comes more than a year after Judge Mehta determined Google’s search business violated antitrust laws. While the decision curbs certain tactics that gave the company an edge, it stops short of banning lucrative default search contracts worth more than $26 billion annually. These deals, often with Apple and other device makers, make Google the default search engine on smartphones and computers.

Although Mehta acknowledged the agreements helped cement Google’s dominance, he concluded that outlawing them could do more harm than good, potentially destabilizing the industry. The judge also rejected the Justice Department’s push to force a divestiture of Chrome, calling it an “incredibly messy and highly risky” step unsupported by evidence that the browser was essential to Google’s monopoly.

Instead, Mehta ordered Google to open parts of its search database to rivals, including Bing and DuckDuckGo, granting them access to some of the data built up from trillions of user queries. Google had strongly opposed the move, warning it raised privacy and security concerns, but the court argued it was a fairer way to stimulate competition.

The Justice Department hailed the ruling as a “major win for the American people,” though officials signaled they may still push for stronger remedies. Advocacy groups, however, criticized the outcome as too lenient. “You don’t find someone guilty of robbing a bank and then sentence him to writing a thank you note for the loot,” said Nidhi Hegde, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project.

See also  US Tech Giants Brace for Fallout from Trump’s H-1B Visa Fee Hike as UK, China Court Global Talent

Google, meanwhile, portrayed the ruling as validation of its stance that competition in search is robust, especially with artificial intelligence reshaping the industry. “The decision recognises how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, the company’s vice president of regulatory affairs.

The ruling was welcomed by Apple, which earns more than $20 billion annually from Google through search placement deals. Apple had warned earlier this year that losing such contracts would hurt its own research efforts. Investors also appeared reassured: Alphabet shares surged more than 7 percent in after-hours trading, while Apple stock climbed 3 percent.

Google still faces mounting legal challenges. Later this month, the Justice Department is set to argue another antitrust case targeting the company’s digital advertising operations, potentially posing an even greater threat to its business model.

Tech

Experts Question Impact of Australia’s New Social Media Ban for Children Under 16

Published

on

Australia has introduced sweeping restrictions that prevent children under 16 from creating or maintaining accounts on major social media platforms, but experts warn the measures may not significantly change young people’s online behaviour. The restrictions, which took effect on December 10, apply to platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Twitch, Reddit and X.

Under the new rules, children cannot open accounts, yet they can still access most platforms without logging in—raising questions about how effective the regulations will be in shaping online habits. The eSafety Commissioner says the reforms are intended to shield children from online pressures, addictive design features and content that may harm their health and wellbeing.

Social media companies are required to block underage users through age-assurance tools that rely on facial-age estimation, ID uploads or parental consent. Ahead of the rollout, authorities tested 60 verification systems across 28,500 facial recognition assessments. The results showed that while many tools could distinguish children from adults, accuracy declined among users aged 16 and 17, girls and non-Caucasian users, where estimates could be off by two years or more. Experts say the limitations mean many teenagers may still find ways around the rules.

“How do they know who is 14 or 15 when the kids have all signed up as being 75?” asked Sonia Livingstone, a social psychology professor at the London School of Economics. She warned that misclassifications will be common as platforms attempt to enforce the regulations.

Meta acknowledged the challenge, saying complete accuracy is unlikely without requiring every user to present government ID—something the company argues would raise privacy and security concerns. Users over 16 who lose access by mistake are allowed to appeal.

See also  US Tech Giants Brace for Fallout from Trump’s H-1B Visa Fee Hike as UK, China Court Global Talent

Several platforms have criticised the ban, arguing that it removes teenagers from safer, controlled environments. Meta and Google representatives told Australian lawmakers that logged-in teenage accounts already come with protections that limit contact from unknown users, filter sensitive subjects and disable personalised advertising. Experts say these protections are not always effective, citing studies where new YouTube and TikTok accounts quickly received misogynistic or self-harm-related content.

Analysts expect many teenagers to shift to smaller or lesser-regulated platforms. Apps such as Lemon8, Coverstar and Tango have surged into Australia’s top downloads since the start of December. Messaging apps like WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal—exempt from the ban—have also seen a spike in downloads. Livingstone said teenagers will simply “find alternative spaces,” noting that previous bans in other countries pushed young users to new platforms within days.

Researchers caution that gaming platforms such as Discord and Roblox, also outside the scope of the ban, may become new gathering points for young Australians. Studies will be conducted to assess the long-term impact on mental health and whether the restrictions support or complicate parents’ efforts to regulate screen time.

Experts say it may take several years to determine whether the ban delivers meaningful improvements to children’s wellbeing.

Continue Reading

Tech

OECD Warns of Sharp Rise in Cyberbullying Across Europe

Published

on

Cyberbullying among adolescents has increased across every European country included in a new report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), raising concerns among researchers, educators and child-protection advocates. The findings, part of the OECD’s How’s Life for Children in the Digital Age? report, show that online harassment is now affecting young people in all 29 countries and regions surveyed, with wide disparities between nations.

The data, which covers children aged 11, 13 and 15, reveals rates ranging from 7.5 per cent in Spain to 27.1 per cent in Lithuania. The European average stands at 15.5 per cent. Alongside Lithuania, the countries with the highest levels include Latvia, Poland, England, Hungary, Estonia, Ireland, Scotland, Slovenia, Sweden, Wales, Finland and Denmark. Nations such as Portugal, Greece, France, Germany and Italy recorded lower-than-average levels.

Cyberbullying in the study refers to repeated or intentional harassment online, including hostile messages, posts designed to ridicule, or the sharing of unflattering or inappropriate images without consent. The OECD noted that online abuse often involves a power imbalance and is amplified by the reach of digital platforms.

Experts attribute national differences to a combination of technological access, cultural norms and institutional preparedness. James O’Higgins Norman, UNESCO Chair on Bullying and Cyberbullying at Dublin City University, said variations in smartphone use, internet penetration and dominant social media platforms influence how often young people are exposed to harmful interactions. He added that cultural attitudes toward conflict and aggression, as well as the quality of school-based prevention programmes, shape each country’s experience.

See also  Wikipedia Thrives in the AI Era, But Researchers Warn of New Challenges from Data Scraping

Specialists from the European Antibullying Network pointed to digital literacy as a key factor. Countries that teach online safety as part of the school curriculum tend to see better outcomes. They also highlighted broader social and economic inequalities, noting that communities with fewer resources often struggle to support vulnerable children effectively.

The report shows that cyberbullying increased everywhere between the 2017–18 and 2021–22 survey periods. Denmark, Lithuania, Norway, Slovenia, Iceland and the Netherlands recorded jumps of more than five percentage points. The OECD average rose from 12.1 to 15.5 per cent. Researchers say the rise coincided with increased access to smartphones and longer daily screen time among adolescents.

Experts agree that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the trend. With schools closed and socialising taking place online, young people spent more time on platforms where conflicts could quickly escalate. Digital environments that offer anonymity and instant communication can weaken empathy and accountability, making hostile behaviour more likely, O’Higgins Norman said. He added that some countries are now reporting signs of stabilisation as in-person schooling has resumed.

Girls are more likely than boys to report being cyberbullied in most countries. Across the OECD sample, the rate is 16.4 per cent for girls and 14.3 per cent for boys. Researchers link this gap to the nature of online interactions, as girls tend to engage more in social-media communication, where relational forms of aggression — such as exclusion or image-based harassment — are more common.

Family structure also plays a significant role. Adolescents living in one-parent households report a cyberbullying rate of 19.8 per cent, compared with 14.1 per cent among those living with two parents. Experts say single parents often face heavier time and financial pressures, reducing their capacity to supervise online activity. Young people in such households may also spend more time online for social connection, increasing exposure to risk.

See also  Greece Warns of Rising Cyber Threats as Digital Tensions Escalate Across Europe

The OECD’s findings add to growing calls for more comprehensive national strategies, stronger digital-literacy education and support structures that reflect the realities of adolescent online life.

Continue Reading

Tech

Turkic States Seek Joint Strategy Against Online Disinformation as Global Platforms Outpace National Laws

Published

on

Turkic-speaking countries are intensifying efforts to develop a coordinated response to online disinformation, as global technology platforms continue to evade national regulations designed to curb false content. Officials from across the region gathered in Baku, Azerbaijan, to discuss shared challenges and the limits of domestic legislation in an era where information circulates far beyond national borders.

Speaking to Euronews, Zarina Kalmuratova, chief specialist in the Information Policy Department of Kyrgyzstan’s Ministry of Culture, Information and Youth Policy, described the scale of the problem. “There are so many platforms—YouTube, Instagram—where citizens also spread false information and the government can’t do anything about it,” she said. Her comments reflect the growing frustration of governments that find themselves unable to enforce national laws on global tech companies operating without an on-the-ground presence.

Kyrgyzstan adopted a law aimed at combating false news in 2022, a move that immediately prompted concerns that it could be used to stifle dissent. Kalmuratova pushed back against such criticism during the Baku conference, saying fears of government overreach had not been borne out. Under the law, individuals who believe they have been targeted by false content may request intervention from authorities. The government can then ask the outlet to remove the material within 24 hours; refusal may lead to temporary blocking of the website for up to two months. Kalmuratova insisted the measures are intended as balanced tools rather than broad censorship powers.

Yet challenges persist when misinformation appears on global platforms such as Facebook, YouTube or Instagram, which often do not comply with requests from smaller states. Kalmuratova argued that encouraging major tech companies to open official offices in Turkic-speaking nations could create clearer mechanisms for accountability. She described such a step as vital to strengthening the region’s ability to enforce local rules.

See also  UN Launches Global Effort to Govern Artificial Intelligence Amid Growing Concerns

The Organization of Turkic States (OTS)—whose full members include Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan—has increasingly framed the issue as a regional problem requiring a shared response. At the Baku meetings, Kazakhstan’s Deputy Minister of Culture and Information, Kanat Iskakov, offered a parallel approach focused on building trust in domestic journalism. He told delegates that coordinated standards for digital media could help develop reliable alternatives to unverified online content.

Iskakov argued that strengthening journalistic quality and producing credible, collaborative content across the region would reduce reliance on questionable sources, highlighting the need to pair regulation with efforts to improve public confidence in official information.

The discussions in Baku, which included the 12th Working Group Meeting on Media and Information and the 7th ministerial conference, are part of the OTS’s broader attempt to harmonize media policy across a culturally linked but politically varied region. The debates underscore a central tension: how to protect citizens from harmful falsehoods while maintaining space for legitimate debate.

The next OTS media forum will take place in Turkey, where member states are expected to continue developing strategies to address platforms operating outside national jurisdictions, strengthen public trust, and pursue regional cooperation that individual countries cannot achieve alone.

Continue Reading

Trending