Tech
Google Reveals Energy and Water Use of AI Prompts in New Study
Google has disclosed new details about the environmental footprint of its artificial intelligence chatbot Gemini, saying each text prompt consumes only a fraction of energy and water compared with earlier public estimates.
According to a technical paper and accompanying blog post released by the company, a single text query on Gemini uses about 0.24 watt-hours (Wh) of energy — roughly equivalent to watching nine seconds of television. That consumption, Google says, translates to about 0.03 grams of carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, each query requires around 0.26 millilitres of water, or approximately five drops, largely used in cooling data centre equipment.
The company stressed that its measurements accounted not only for the power consumed by the chips running Gemini but also the energy used by IT equipment in data centres, idle chip power, and water for cooling systems. By including these factors, Google argued, its estimates provide a more accurate picture of environmental impact than many existing studies.
“Per-prompt emissions are quite small,” the blog post noted, adding that the company’s figures show energy and water usage to be “substantially lower than many public estimates.”
The announcement comes as concerns grow about the rising energy demands of advanced computing. The International Energy Agency (IEA) recently projected that electricity demand from data centres, AI, and cryptocurrency could double by 2030, with AI alone expected to consume up to 945 terawatt-hours annually — nearly equivalent to Japan’s current power use.
Comparisons between Gemini and other platforms highlight stark differences. A study by the Electric Power Research Institute estimated that a prompt issued to OpenAI’s ChatGPT consumes 2.9 Wh of energy, nearly ten times Google’s figure. By contrast, a traditional internet search requires about 0.3 Wh.
Despite these relatively low per-query figures, Google’s overall emissions have surged in recent years. Its latest environmental report showed emissions up 51 percent since 2019, driven largely by the production and assembly of hardware needed to support AI technology. The company acknowledged that upstream supply chain activities are contributing significantly to its carbon footprint.
At the same time, Google said efficiency improvements are underway. The company claims that since August 2024, energy use and carbon emissions per Gemini prompt have fallen 33-fold and 44-fold respectively, reflecting advances in hardware and software optimization.
However, analysts note that the company’s data leaves key questions unanswered. While per-query emissions are modest, Google has not disclosed the total number of Gemini prompts processed daily. Without those figures, the full scale of the chatbot’s energy demand remains unclear.
As AI adoption accelerates worldwide, the debate over its environmental costs is intensifying. Google’s new disclosures suggest progress in efficiency but also underscore the challenge of balancing technological innovation with sustainability.
Tech
Researchers Warn AI Systems Can Now Replicate and Spread Across Computers
A new study by US-based cybersecurity group Palisade Research has raised concerns about the growing capabilities of advanced artificial intelligence systems after researchers demonstrated that some AI models were able to copy themselves, spread to other computers, and continue launching attacks without human assistance.
The experiment, described by researchers as the first known example of autonomous AI self-replication, tested several leading AI systems from OpenAI, Anthropic and Alibaba.
According to the research team, the tests were conducted in a controlled environment using computers intentionally fitted with security weaknesses. The AI models were connected to custom-built software that allowed them to interact directly with computer systems and execute commands beyond the capabilities of ordinary chatbot interfaces.
Researchers instructed some systems to copy themselves directly, while others were asked to break into vulnerable computers and install another AI model. Since OpenAI and Anthropic do not publicly release the core files behind their commercial systems, the tests involving those companies used Alibaba’s Qwen models as the transferable software.
The AI systems were required to locate security flaws, gain access to computers, steal login credentials, move necessary files, and create functioning copies of themselves on new machines. Once installed, the copied AI could continue attacking additional systems independently.
One of the most striking results involved Alibaba’s Qwen3.6-27B model, which successfully spread itself across four computers located in Canada, the United States, Finland and India after receiving only a single prompt. Researchers said the process took just under three hours and required no further human involvement.
The experiment was halted after three stages, though the final copy remained operational and theoretically capable of continuing the process.
Success rates varied between models. Researchers reported that Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 completed the tasks in 81 percent of attempts, while OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 succeeded in roughly one-third of tests. Different versions of Alibaba’s Qwen models achieved success rates ranging from 19 percent to 33 percent.
The findings arrive amid wider debate over the risks posed by increasingly capable AI systems. Last month, Anthropic announced that it would not publicly release a version of its Claude Mythos Preview model, describing it as too dangerous because of its potential use in sophisticated cyberattacks.
Security experts have long warned that self-replicating systems could become difficult to contain if deployed maliciously. Traditional computer viruses can already copy themselves, but researchers said this experiment demonstrated AI systems making independent decisions to exploit vulnerabilities and continue spreading.
Despite the results, the researchers stressed that the study took place under tightly controlled conditions with deliberately weakened security systems. They noted that real-world networks often include monitoring tools and protections designed to block such attacks.
Still, the team said the experiment showed that autonomous AI self-replication can no longer be viewed as a theoretical possibility, but as a capability that now exists in practice.
Tech
AI Study Raises Privacy Questions After Chat Data Reveals Personality Traits
Tech
Zuckerberg and Chan Commit $500 Million to AI Project Aimed at Mapping Human Cells
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Home Improvement1 year agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
