Tech
Survey Finds Misinformation, Economy and Terrorism Top Global Concerns
A new international survey has revealed that people across the world view the spread of online misinformation, economic uncertainty, and terrorism as the most pressing national threats, while concern over climate change and infectious diseases has waned in wealthier nations.
The study, conducted earlier this year among more than 31,000 adults in 25 countries, highlights how public fears are shifting in response to political, economic, and technological developments.
In Europe, misinformation emerged as the dominant concern in half of the countries surveyed. Majorities in Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom said false information online posed the greatest threat to their nations. In Germany, 81 percent of respondents expressed this view, while in Poland the figure was even higher at 85 percent. Analysts believe the heightened sensitivity in both countries may be linked to Russian disinformation campaigns targeting recent elections.
“Elections in Germany and Poland appear to have sharpened perceptions of misinformation as a threat,” said Jacob Poushter, associate director of research at the Pew Research Center, which led the survey.
Elsewhere in Europe, misinformation still ranked among the top two concerns in France, Italy, Hungary, and Spain. Greece was the outlier, with citizens more worried about economic conditions and climate change than fake news.
The survey also found sharp political divides over perceptions of misinformation. In Germany, 89 percent of respondents with an unfavorable view of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party described fake news as a major threat, compared with only 55 percent of those with a favorable opinion of the party. Similar ideological splits were recorded in Poland, Hungary, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the UK.
Globally, misinformation is not just a European concern. Respondents in both the United States and South Korea identified it as the most significant national threat. In fact, majorities in 24 of the 25 countries surveyed shared this view. The only exception was Israel, where just 43 percent saw misinformation as a major issue. Instead, nearly nine in ten Israelis named terrorism as the greatest threat to their country.
The study also highlighted age-related differences. Older adults in several countries—including Argentina, Canada, Japan, Kenya, Poland, Sweden, and the US—were more likely than younger people to describe misinformation as a serious danger.
Beyond the issue of fake news, the survey found a resurgence of concern about the global economy, while climate change and infectious diseases—once dominant worries during the pandemic and amid record heatwaves—have receded in high-income countries.
Poushter noted that the persistence of misinformation at the top of global concerns underscores its deep impact. “The bottom line is that people are concerned about a lot of issues right now, but false information continues to stand out,” he said.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
