Tech
Judge Stops Short of Forcing Google to Sell Chrome in Antitrust Case
A U.S. federal judge has ruled that Google will not be required to sell its Chrome browser, despite finding the company guilty of illegally maintaining a monopoly in online search. The decision, delivered Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in a 226-page order, imposes restrictions on some of Google’s practices but rejects the government’s bid for a broader breakup of the tech giant.
The ruling comes more than a year after Judge Mehta determined Google’s search business violated antitrust laws. While the decision curbs certain tactics that gave the company an edge, it stops short of banning lucrative default search contracts worth more than $26 billion annually. These deals, often with Apple and other device makers, make Google the default search engine on smartphones and computers.
Although Mehta acknowledged the agreements helped cement Google’s dominance, he concluded that outlawing them could do more harm than good, potentially destabilizing the industry. The judge also rejected the Justice Department’s push to force a divestiture of Chrome, calling it an “incredibly messy and highly risky” step unsupported by evidence that the browser was essential to Google’s monopoly.
Instead, Mehta ordered Google to open parts of its search database to rivals, including Bing and DuckDuckGo, granting them access to some of the data built up from trillions of user queries. Google had strongly opposed the move, warning it raised privacy and security concerns, but the court argued it was a fairer way to stimulate competition.
The Justice Department hailed the ruling as a “major win for the American people,” though officials signaled they may still push for stronger remedies. Advocacy groups, however, criticized the outcome as too lenient. “You don’t find someone guilty of robbing a bank and then sentence him to writing a thank you note for the loot,” said Nidhi Hegde, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project.
Google, meanwhile, portrayed the ruling as validation of its stance that competition in search is robust, especially with artificial intelligence reshaping the industry. “The decision recognises how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, the company’s vice president of regulatory affairs.
The ruling was welcomed by Apple, which earns more than $20 billion annually from Google through search placement deals. Apple had warned earlier this year that losing such contracts would hurt its own research efforts. Investors also appeared reassured: Alphabet shares surged more than 7 percent in after-hours trading, while Apple stock climbed 3 percent.
Google still faces mounting legal challenges. Later this month, the Justice Department is set to argue another antitrust case targeting the company’s digital advertising operations, potentially posing an even greater threat to its business model.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
