Connect with us

Tech

Transatlantic Tensions on Digital Rules Highlight Need for Cooperation

Published

on

Discussions between Europe and the United States over digital regulation continue to be marked by miscommunication and frustration, even as competitors observe from the sidelines. Europeans and Americans talk past each other while rivals watch. The European Union can set its own standards, but in an interconnected economy, decoupling fantasies and grandstanding won’t help.

The debate often centres on “free speech” concerns voiced by U.S. tech companies and policymakers in response to the EU’s legislative framework for digital platforms. In Europe, such narratives typically prompt defensive reactions. Some Europeans respond with a blunt message: “This is our land, our Union, our laws, follow them, or leave the EU—we’ll find alternative products to use!” Public awareness of American constitutional amendments is low across Europe, just as Americans pay little attention to European digital acts and regulations.

The transatlantic dialogue is further complicated by the global nature of social media platforms. Any EU legislation affecting user experience inevitably influences the functioning of these platforms worldwide, touching on what Americans see as free speech rights. The EU also seeks to extend its influence through the “Brussels effect,” ensuring that European rules shape global standards, while the U.S. maintains a large trade surplus in services and competes technologically with China. This mix of economic, political, and regulatory factors explains why U.S. attention is sharply focused on Europe’s digital policies.

Europeans argue that their 450-million-consumer market has the right to set rules that reflect local principles and values. Attempts to adjust or simplify regulations are difficult, with efforts often met with political resistance and scrutiny. The regulatory ecosystem in Europe supports industries of lawyers, consultants, and experts whose work depends on maintaining complex rules, making reform a sensitive topic.

See also  Meta Apps Collect More User Data Than Other Big Tech, Study Finds

On the American side, anti-EU rhetoric by public figures has sometimes compounded the problem, drowning out moderates and reinforcing defensive European responses. Analysts note that both regions have seen productive voices sidelined as grandstanding and negative statements dominate public discourse.

Observers argue that long-term thinking is necessary. By evaluating the EU-U.S. tech partnership in the broader context of global alliances, including China and Russia, policymakers can better assess priorities and avoid unnecessary disruption. Blank-slate decoupling between Europe and the United States is unrealistic, and delaying constructive dialogue risks broader economic consequences.

Experts warn that continued transatlantic infighting benefits other global powers and weakens the ability of both regions to set coherent standards in emerging technologies. The message from analysts is clear: cooperation, not confrontation, will determine whether the EU and U.S. can maintain leadership in digital regulation while safeguarding economic and technological interests.

Tech

Lancet Study Warns AI Misuse and Nuclear War Could Threaten Humanity by 2100

Published

on

The malicious use of artificial intelligence and nuclear conflict are among 17 major threats to global health that could put humanity at risk of extinction by 2100, according to a new assessment published in The Lancet.

The study, conducted by the Lancet Commission on 21st-century global threats to health, examines risks ranging from nuclear war and antimicrobial resistance to climate change, pandemics, income inequality, obesity, tobacco use and mental health problems.

The commission brings together 37 experts in health, economics, security and technology. Researchers assessed the potential impact of the threats across 204 countries and territories between 2025 and 2100, using disability-adjusted life years, or DALYs, to estimate the loss of healthy human life.

The measure accounts for years lost through premature death and years lived with illness or disability. The researchers used best-case and worst-case scenarios to examine how much harm each threat could cause and how preventive action might reduce the consequences.

The estimated burden across the 17 threats ranges from 1.02 billion to 23.1 billion DALYs. For comparison, the COVID-19 pandemic caused an estimated 500 million DALYs. Obesity represents the largest cumulative burden that could potentially be reduced through intervention.

The researchers warned that nuclear conflict could cause widespread destruction beyond the immediate effects of weapons, including nuclear famine resulting from the disruption of food production and supply. The malicious use of AI could also create severe dangers, including the development or deployment of biological weapons.

The commission stressed that the assessment is not intended to rank threats or prescribe a fixed order for government action. Instead, it provides a framework for understanding their potential effects, recognising that the findings will change as new evidence emerges.

See also  Merz and Meloni Double Down on Legislative Self-Restraint in Updated Italo-German Plan

The experts said the threats are closely connected and require coordinated responses rather than separate efforts focused on individual problems. They called for a comprehensive approach based on scientific evidence, human rights and international solidarity.

One key recommendation is for governments to build health systems capable of responding quickly to major emergencies. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of preparedness, adequate resources and effective coordination when confronting a global crisis.

The commission also urged greater investment in potentially transformative technologies, including nuclear fusion, carbon removal and vaccines, which could help address climate change, infectious diseases and other major risks.

Regular monitoring and updated risk assessments are another priority. The researchers recommended sharing findings with international bodies, including the United Nations and the G20, to encourage governments to cooperate before emerging threats develop into full-scale crises.

According to the commission, the current competitive approach to tackling global challenges is limiting the prospects for effective action.

The findings were presented on Sunday at the World Health Summit in Berlin, Germany. The assessment is due to be updated annually to reflect new evidence, changes in existing risks and the emergence of additional threats.

The researchers said early action could help governments limit the potential damage and reduce the likelihood of the worst-case scenarios identified in the report.

Continue Reading

Tech

Denmark Moves to Ban Sharing of Realistic Deepfakes Without Consent

Published

on

Denmark is set to introduce legislation on Thursday that would prohibit the sharing of realistic deepfakes depicting people’s faces or voices without their consent, as governments around the world seek to address the growing risks posed by artificial intelligence.

The proposed amendment to Denmark’s copyright law would give people greater control over digital versions of their appearance and voice. The protections would apply to ordinary individuals as well as artists whose performances could be digitally copied or manipulated.

Deepfakes are digitally generated or altered images, videos and audio designed to make people appear to say or do things they did not. They have increasingly been used to spread false information, damage reputations and create humiliating or abusive material.

Denmark’s Culture Minister Zenia Stampe said the technology allows manipulated content to be produced and distributed on social media with little effort.

One of the government’s key aims is to ensure that major technology companies remove harmful manipulated material quickly, reducing the potential damage to people targeted by such content.

The legislation follows a broad political agreement reached in June 2025 under the previous Danish government. That agreement was aimed at protecting people from unauthorised digital imitations.

The proposed rules would not impose a blanket ban on digitally altered content. Exceptions would cover satire, parody, caricature and criticism of politicians, institutions and society.

Those protections would not apply where misinformation creates serious risks to other people’s rights, essential interests, lives or property.

The Danish government hopes the legislation will come into force at the beginning of 2027.

See also  AI Trends in 2026: World Models, Small Language Models, and Rising Concerns Over Safety and Regulation

The move comes as countries and international institutions introduce new measures to address the misuse of synthetic media.

EU member states covered by the bloc’s directive on violence against women must implement the legislation by June 14, 2027. It requires countries to criminalise the creation of sexually explicit manipulated material and its subsequent public distribution without the consent of the person depicted when the material is likely to cause serious harm.

Denmark is not bound by that directive because it has an opt-out from EU justice and home affairs rules.

France already prohibits the distribution of AI-generated images or audio depicting another person without consent when the artificial nature of the material is not obvious or clearly disclosed. French law also prohibits the non-consensual sharing of sexual deepfakes regardless of whether they are labelled as manipulated.

In England and Wales, creating or requesting non-consensual intimate deepfakes became a criminal offence in February. Sharing such material can result in a prison sentence of up to two years.

Denmark’s proposed law would add to a growing set of national measures aimed at giving individuals greater protection as increasingly realistic digital impersonations become easier to create and distribute.

Continue Reading

Tech

AI Agents Take Centre Stage as Qatar Expands Training and Testing

Published

on

Artificial intelligence agents that can perform tasks on behalf of users were a major focus at the Google Cloud Summit in Doha, as Qatar expands its efforts to train workers and test new AI applications.

The technology is moving beyond generative AI, which produces text, images and answers in response to prompts. AI agents are designed to take additional steps independently to complete specific tasks, creating new opportunities for businesses while raising questions about oversight and the future of work.

Alex Rutter, managing director of Google Cloud’s artificial intelligence business across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, said generative AI is primarily used to create new content through large language models. Agentic AI, by contrast, can be used to carry out processes after receiving instructions.

Rutter cited invoice reconciliation as an example. An AI agent could check information on an invoice against payment and supplier records before a payment is approved. Such repetitive work involving multiple databases could be suitable for automation, he said.

Greater autonomy also increases the need for safeguards. Rutter said Google currently recommends keeping a person involved in reviewing the results produced by AI agents. Instead of checking every piece of data, employees could focus on exceptions identified by the systems.

The level of human oversight would depend on the nature of the task and the risks an organisation is prepared to accept. In fields such as medicine, Rutter said AI should assist clinicians rather than replace their decisions.

The Doha summit also marked three years since Google Cloud opened its cloud region in Qatar. The company announced a new national training programme with Qatar Digital Academy that is expected to provide more than 50,000 learning opportunities in the country by 2030.

See also  Meta Apps Collect More User Data Than Other Big Tech, Study Finds

The programme will target several groups, including workers, executives and software developers, as Qatar seeks to expand its pool of people with skills needed to use and manage AI technologies.

Ghassan Kosta, Google Cloud’s regional general manager for Qatar, Oman, Bahrain and Iraq, said the company was expanding its services to support the growing demands of agentic AI. He said data centre infrastructure would need to develop alongside advances in AI.

Qatar’s Ministry of Communications and Information Technology also announced an innovation lab developed with Google Cloud. The facility will allow AI projects to be tested before they are deployed more widely.

Amna Al-Kaabi, head of emerging technologies at the ministry, said the partnership was intended to connect technology experiments with practical needs in different sectors and help projects progress from early testing to real-world applications.

The increasing ability of AI systems to perform tasks is also prompting questions about employment. Rutter said it was difficult to predict the pace of change, but suggested that managing AI agents could become a responsibility for some workers.

He said future workplaces could include employees managing people, AI agents or both, although businesses are still determining which tasks can safely and effectively be assigned to autonomous systems.

Continue Reading

Trending