Tech
European Commission Closes Better Regulation Consultation, Public Calls for Strong Impact Assessments
On February 4, the European Commission concluded its public consultation on the Better Regulation framework, seeking feedback on how the initiative could be improved. Among the 286 respondents, representing industry, consumer groups, public sector organizations, and transparency advocates, the majority urged the Commission to maintain robust impact assessments and consultation tools rather than weakening them.
The feedback comes as the EU seeks to speed up decision-making while maintaining transparency and stakeholder engagement. Responses ranged from detailed proposals to ensure focused stakeholder involvement to criticisms of the Commission’s Omnibus approach to legislation.
In its response, Consumer Choice Center Europe (CCCE) suggested that the Commission take stronger action to prevent the overuse of exemptions from Better Regulation guidelines. “Nothing motivates Europeans more than fact-based evidence,” the organization said, calling for disclosure of all exemptions requested since 2021. Current rules allow exemptions for political imperatives, emergencies, or deadlines, but critics warn that such flexibility fosters a culture of loophole-seeking.
Another concern raised during the consultation is the structure of public consultations. Critics note that some surveys, such as those for the Digital Fairness Act, provide detailed answer options for supporters of proposals while offering limited space for opponents to explain their views. Respondents called for more rigorous methodological standards to ensure all stakeholders can express their opinions equally.
The consultation also highlighted the need for faster, clearer feedback. The CCCE recommended that statistical summaries on the “Have Your Say” portal include information on whether respondents support, oppose, or remain neutral on proposals. Currently, summaries are released up to two months after consultations, and critics warn that results can be framed subjectively. Shorter, more readable synopses of the most common arguments, emailed to participants, could increase transparency and trust.
Transparency was another central theme. Respondents suggested that the Commission publish factual summaries not only for formal public consultations but also for targeted consultations and stakeholder meetings. While current guidelines recommend this as “good practice,” advocates argue it should be mandatory to prevent decision-making behind closed doors.
The consultation responses signal a clear message from the European public: while the EU seeks efficiency in legislative processes, citizens and organizations want consultative mechanisms and impact assessments to remain strong and accessible.
The Commission now faces the challenge of balancing faster policy adoption with transparency and accountability, ensuring that citizens can continue to engage meaningfully in shaping EU law.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement1 year agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
