Connect with us

Travel

SAS to Cancel Over 1,000 Flights as Fuel Costs Surge Amid Middle East Conflict

Published

on

Scandinavian airline SAS has announced plans to cancel at least 1,000 flights in April as soaring fuel prices linked to the Middle East conflict continue to strain the aviation sector. The carrier said further cancellations are likely after the Easter period, when travel demand typically declines.

Chief executive Anko van der Werff said the rapid rise in jet fuel costs has created significant pressure on operations. Speaking to Swedish business daily Dagens Industri, he noted that fuel prices had doubled within ten days, describing the increase as a major shock for airlines already managing tight margins.

The airline said it had already begun scaling back services in March, with several hundred flights cancelled while attempting to minimise disruption to passengers. Most of these cancellations affected domestic routes in Norway, with only limited impact on services in Sweden and Denmark.

SAS operates roughly 800 flights per day, and the company stressed that the planned reductions represent a relatively small share of its total operations. Even so, executives said the measures are necessary to manage rising costs and maintain financial stability in an increasingly uncertain environment.

The surge in fuel prices follows a sharp increase in global oil markets. Brent crude oil has climbed to around $100 per barrel after tensions escalated following military action involving Iran. The situation has disrupted key supply routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant share of global oil supplies normally passes.

SAS said it had already introduced fare increases to offset the rising cost of jet fuel, joining other international carriers taking similar steps. Airlines including Air France-KLM, Cathay Pacific, Air India and Qantas have also raised ticket prices in response to higher operating costs.

See also  Prague to Ban Late-Night Pub Crawls Amid Efforts to Curb Rowdy Tourism

In addition to pricing adjustments, many airlines have reduced or suspended services to parts of the Middle East due to security concerns, while rerouting flights to avoid affected airspace. These changes have increased travel times and operational expenses, adding further pressure on ticket prices.

Industry analysts say passengers may continue to face higher fares in the coming months, even if tensions ease. Increased demand for alternative routes that bypass the Middle East is also contributing to rising costs.

SAS said it is taking steps to strengthen its resilience, including short-term schedule adjustments, as it navigates the ongoing volatility in global energy markets and the broader impact of geopolitical tensions on the aviation industry.

Travel

Wizz Air Named Europe’s Cheapest Airline as British Airways Tops Cost Ranking

Published

on

Wizz Air has been ranked the least expensive airline in Europe, while British Airways was identified as the costliest major national carrier, according to research comparing passenger revenue generated across 23 European airlines.

The analysis by flight and baggage compensation company AirAdvisor used revenue per available seat kilometre, or RASK, to compare how much airlines earn from passengers for each kilometre flown per available seat.

RASK provides an indication of how much travellers pay relative to distance and available capacity. The measure also reflects additional passenger charges, including fees for baggage and seat selection, rather than relying only on advertised ticket prices.

AirAdvisor said smaller airlines often have higher costs because they operate fewer routes, smaller fleets and services to remote or lower-demand destinations. With fewer seats available and less competition on some routes, fares can be higher.

However, the company said the pattern does not apply universally and travellers should compare prices for individual routes before booking.

The research also found that airline costs generally fell between 2024 and 2025. Among the 14 carriers for which AirAdvisor had year-on-year RASK figures, only five recorded increases, while nine saw their RASK decline.

Norway’s Widerøe topped the overall cost ranking with a RASK of €0.32. The regional airline operates many routes connecting smaller Norwegian airports with larger centres and also serves destinations including Aberdeen, Hamburg and London Southend.

Among major airlines, British Airways ranked as Europe’s most expensive national carrier, with a 2025 RASK of €0.0888. Its figure increased by €0.0038 from the previous year.

See also  Wizz Air Named Europe’s Cheapest Airline as British Airways Tops Cost Ranking

Air France and Austrian Airlines shared the next position among the most expensive major carriers, both recording a RASK of €0.0850.

At the other end of the ranking, Hungary-based Wizz Air had the lowest RASK at €0.0433, making it the least expensive airline in AirAdvisor’s comparison.

The company estimated that choosing Wizz Air instead of Air France could save travellers up to €50 on an average European flight distance, although actual savings depend on the route and additional fees.

easyJet ranked second among the least expensive airlines, with its RASK falling from €0.0770 in 2024 to €0.0521 in 2025.

Ryanair took third place, with RASK declining from €0.0843 to €0.0556 over the same period.

Among the 11 major national airlines included in the study, Finnair was ranked the least expensive.

The findings suggest that airline pricing can vary significantly even among national carriers, while the cost differences between airlines become more noticeable when viewed across typical travel distances.

AirAdvisor advised passengers to use such comparisons as a guide rather than a guarantee of the final fare, as route-specific pricing, luggage charges, seat fees and other extras can significantly affect the total cost of a journey.

Continue Reading

Travel

Mont Blanc Hiking Route Faces Calls for Visitor Limits as Crowds Grow

Published

on

One of Europe’s most popular long-distance hiking routes is facing new pressure to restrict visitor numbers as growing crowds create problems for local communities, mountain guides and the environment.

The Tour du Mont-Blanc is a 170-kilometre circuit passing through France, Italy and Switzerland. Around 80,000 people complete the route each year, with some sections becoming increasingly crowded during the peak hiking season.

On busy parts of the trail, groups can find themselves walking almost continuously behind one another, leaving little space between hikers. Local residents have also raised concerns about visitors failing to respect the natural environment.

Jean-Marc Peillex, mayor of Saint-Gervais-les-Bains in the French Alps, said the situation had become difficult to manage.

“Today we’re moving along in single file. People can only see the backsides of those in front of them. That’s hardly ideal,” he told Swiss public broadcaster SRF.

Peillex wants access to the French section of the route restricted from next spring, with checks and penalties used to enforce the system.

Under the proposed arrangements, hikers planning to complete the Tour du Mont-Blanc would need to reserve accommodation in a mountain hut or an authorised bivouac area. These designated outdoor camping zones generally offer limited facilities compared with huts.

Peillex said hikers unable to secure a place should consider delaying their trip until the following year.

Although only a small section of the route passes through Saint-Gervais-les-Bains, other French municipalities along the trail are working together on the proposed regulations. Their goal is to introduce the new system next spring.

See also  Gatwick Airport South Terminal Reopens After Security Alert Disrupts Flights

Switzerland has not announced similar restrictions, although officials there also acknowledge growing pressure from tourism.

Joachim Rausis, mayor of Orsières in Switzerland’s Valais canton, said there were warning signs and that better coordination was needed between France, Italy and Switzerland.

The rising number of visitors is also creating difficulties for mountain guides. Hotels and mountain huts often need to be booked a year ahead, making planning difficult for self-employed guides whose clients may not arrange trips so far in advance.

The debate reflects a wider challenge facing Alpine tourism: finding a balance between protecting fragile mountain environments, supporting local communities and maintaining public access to the mountains.

Reservation systems are already used on some routes leading toward the Mont Blanc summit. Overnight stays at the Nid d’Aigle, Tête Rousse and Goûter huts require advance bookings, with hikers’ names recorded and booking confirmations subject to checks.

The Goûter and Tête Rousse huts had been operating during the 2026 season but were temporarily closed on August 11 because of rockfall risks.

Officials now face the task of deciding whether similar controls should be extended to the wider Tour du Mont-Blanc as visitor numbers continue to rise.

Continue Reading

Travel

Spain Introduces Border Checks on Travellers Arriving From Italy

Published

on

Spain has introduced temporary border checks on travellers arriving from Italy, escalating a dispute between Madrid and Rome over controls imposed during the recent Ceuta migrant crisis.

The measures came into effect from Saturday, August 8, after Italy refused to comply with a Spanish demand to remove its own border checks on travellers arriving from Spain. Madrid said its controls would remain in place until September 7, while Rome confirmed on Friday that its suspension of normal Schengen arrangements would continue at least until August 15.

The dispute comes during the peak summer travel season, when thousands of people are expected to travel between the two countries. Spanish officials have criticised the Italian measures, saying Spanish citizens have already faced additional checks when entering Italy.

Under Spain’s new arrangements, travellers arriving from Italy by air, sea or land may be required to present identification documents. EU citizens must show a valid identity document, while travellers from outside the bloc may also need to provide a visa or residence permit.

Italian nationals can use either a passport or a national identity card valid for international travel. However, Spain’s requirements come shortly after Italy stopped recognising paper identity cards as travel documents from August 3. Travellers using Italian identity cards must therefore have the electronic CIE version.

The additional checks could cause delays at major airports, ports and land crossings, particularly during one of the busiest periods of the European holiday season.

At airports, Spanish authorities may conduct checks at arrival gates or during boarding. Travellers arriving by ferry or other maritime services could be checked either before departure or after reaching Spain.

See also  Rome’s Jubilee Fails to Deliver Rental Boom, Leaves Landlords Disappointed and Locals Frustrated

People travelling by road from Italy will generally pass through France before reaching Spain. They may therefore be stopped at the French-Spanish border and asked to present their identification documents.

Families travelling with children have also been advised to ensure that every minor carries the necessary travel documents. Italian regulations provide identity documents with different validity periods depending on a child’s age. Documents are valid for three years for children under three and five years for those aged between three and 18.

Children under 14 are not permitted to travel alone, adding another consideration for families planning journeys between the two countries.

Travellers bringing pets into Spain must also meet EU requirements. Animals need an EU pet passport issued by a veterinarian, along with a microchip and valid vaccination against rabies.

The dispute has created additional uncertainty for travellers who arranged their summer journeys before the measures were announced. Madrid and Rome now face pressure to resolve the disagreement while avoiding further disruption to movement between two EU member states normally connected by the Schengen free-travel area.

Continue Reading

Trending