Connect with us

Tech

France Ranks Last in Global AI Adoption Among Public Servants, Study Finds

Published

on

France ranks last in a new global index measuring artificial intelligence adoption in government, with nearly half of its public servants reporting that they have never used AI at work, despite substantial government investment in the technology.

The Public Sector AI Adoption Index 2026, released on Monday by Public First for the Center for Data Innovation with support from Google, surveyed 3,335 civil servants across 10 countries, including the United States, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, Brazil, South Africa, India, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia. The study highlights a gap between ambitious AI strategies and actual implementation in European governments.

According to the index, 74 percent of French public servants said AI cannot perform any part of their work, and about 45 percent reported never using AI on the job. Only 27 percent noted that their organisations had invested in AI tools, and many said guidance from leadership on AI use was unclear.

“While France positions AI as a strategic tool for competitiveness and modernisation, without hands-on experience, its value remains abstract for many workers,” the report stated. Researchers warned that 70 percent of employees who actively use AI in organisations with limited guidance are doing so in “shadow” mode, meaning they operate AI tools without informing their employers.

Across Europe, adoption of AI in public services remains cautious. Germany and France were grouped as risk-averse countries, where AI is limited to specialists and pilot projects. The United Kingdom showed more progress, with 37 percent of public servants receiving AI training, but adoption remains uneven across departments and access to approved tools is limited.

See also  Iranian Missiles Breach Israeli Defences, Sparking Questions Over Effectiveness of Missile Shield

By contrast, countries such as Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and India led the index. Public servants in these countries report widespread, everyday use of AI in government work, supported by clear leadership guidance and training programmes. Globally, 74 percent of public servants now use AI, and 80 percent say it empowers them, but only 18 percent believe their governments are using AI very effectively.

The survey assessed adoption across five areas: attitudes toward AI, confidence in using it, access to approved tools, integration of AI in daily work, and access to training. Experts said these factors determine whether governments can translate ambitious AI strategies into tangible improvements in public services.

“Many governments have ambitious plans for AI in the public sector, but some are creating better conditions for real‑world use than others,” said Rachel Wolf, CEO of Public First. “Our research shows who is succeeding and where improvement is needed. This matters because effective AI enables better public services, stronger outcomes for citizens, and more resilient public institutions.”

The findings raise questions about the effectiveness of France’s AI initiatives, which have included significant investment in infrastructure and ethical frameworks aimed at guiding responsible AI deployment in government. Analysts said closing the gap between strategy and practical use will be critical for the country to realise the benefits of AI for public services.

Tech

Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027

Published

on

A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.

Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.

Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.

“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.

Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.

According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.

He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.

Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.

The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.

See also  Study Finds Polish Outperforms English as the Best Language for Communicating with AI

Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.

Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.

The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.

While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.

He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.

Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.

The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.

Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.

Continue Reading

Tech

AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines

Published

on

A fully automated parapharmacy in Lisbon is changing the way customers shop for health and wellness products by combining artificial intelligence, cameras and sensors to eliminate checkout counters and in-store staff.

Located in the Parque das Nações district, the store operates without cashiers or pharmacists on-site during normal business hours. Staff only enter the premises to restock shelves, while customers complete their purchases independently.

The concept was developed to allow pharmacists to spend more time on clinical care instead of retail operations, according to Catarina Dias, the pharmacist who manages Pharma&Go.

“We are investing in solutions that allow pharmacists and the professionals we have to focus on the clinical side while reducing the time spent on commercial tasks,” Dias said.

The shop stocks products that customers can purchase without a prescription, including skincare products, baby care items, supplements and oral hygiene products. Prescription medicines and over-the-counter drugs are not currently available.

Customers begin their visit by tapping a credit or debit card at the entrance. Once the payment method is verified, the door unlocks and shoppers can enter the store. The card used at the entrance is linked to everyone entering at the same time, and all selected products are automatically charged to that payment method when customers leave.

“There are no tills, no queues and no complications,” Dias said, explaining that customers simply enter, choose their products and walk out.

The system relies on hundreds of cameras and sensors working alongside artificial intelligence software that monitors customers and tracks products as they move through the store. The technology identifies which items have been removed from the shelves and automatically completes the purchase when the customer exits.

See also  European Commission Closes Better Regulation Consultation, Public Calls for Strong Impact Assessments

Dias said the automated system gives shoppers greater flexibility by allowing them to spend as much or as little time in the store as they choose. Some customers complete their shopping in less than a minute, while others take longer to compare products and read ingredient labels.

Since opening in November, the store has seen customer numbers increase every month as more people become familiar with the technology.

According to Dias, the system records an error rate of less than 2%, with most mistakes resulting from customer behaviour rather than technical failures.

She recalled one incident in which a customer politely held the door open for another shopper entering behind him. Because the system associated everyone entering together with the same payment card, both customers’ purchases were charged to the first visitor.

Although the concept was initially expected to appeal mainly to younger consumers, Dias said older customers have also embraced the technology. She noted that many shoppers in their seventies and eighties have found the process straightforward, helped by the store’s accessible design and simple payment system.

The 90-square-metre shop was developed through a partnership between Sensei and Glintt Life using private funding. Dias said an application for public funding under Portugal’s Recovery and Resilience Plan was unsuccessful because the project was not considered sufficiently innovative.

Despite that setback, she believes automated retail technology has significant potential and expects the concept to continue expanding in the future.

Continue Reading

Tech

Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety

Published

on

More than 100 international organisations have called on governments to hold artificial intelligence companies directly responsible for protecting children online, warning that existing regulatory approaches are failing to prevent harm.

The appeal, led by the children’s rights organisation 5Rights Foundation and supported by groups including Amnesty International and Save the Children, was issued ahead of the United Nations’ first Global Dialogue on AI Governance. The coalition argues that governments should require technology companies to prove their AI systems are safe for children before they are made publicly available.

The organisations said artificial intelligence is already affecting children in harmful ways and that current regulations often respond only after damage has occurred.

Leanda Barrington-Leach, executive director of the 5Rights Foundation, said children are not opposed to technological progress but want stronger safeguards in place before products reach the market.

“They aren’t asking us to block AI innovation, but it shouldn’t be a case of cleaning up the mess after harm has happened either,” she said.

The statement comes as legal challenges involving AI companies continue to grow. Firms including Character Technologies and OpenAI have faced lawsuits over allegations that AI-powered chatbots, particularly “companion” bots designed to simulate emotional relationships, can negatively affect children. Some claims also argue that these products have been presented as suitable for younger users without sufficient warnings about potential risks.

The coalition believes governments should focus on the commercial incentives that encourage companies to prioritise rapid product development and user engagement over safety.

Among the recommendations are mandatory safety assessments before AI products are released, financial penalties for companies whose systems violate children’s rights, bans on design features that exploit children’s psychological vulnerabilities, and restrictions on the commercial use of children’s images, voices and biometric data.

See also  Mobile World Congress Opens in Barcelona With Focus on AI and 5G Concerns

The organisations maintain that governments do not need entirely new legislation to introduce these protections. Instead, they argue that countries should enforce commitments already made under international agreements, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Global Digital Compact, which outlines principles for protecting human rights in the digital environment.

Barrington-Leach said stronger accountability is needed to change how AI products are developed and marketed.

“As long as companies are rewarded for speed, engagement and data extraction rather than safety, we’ll keep treating the symptoms while the disease becomes endemic,” she said. She added that respecting children’s rights should become a fundamental requirement for technology companies rather than a voluntary commitment.

The United Nations’ inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance is expected to bring together government representatives, technology companies, researchers and civil society organisations to discuss international standards for artificial intelligence. Child safety is likely to be one of the key topics as policymakers seek to balance technological innovation with stronger protections for vulnerable users.

Continue Reading

Trending