Tech
France Ranks Last in Global AI Adoption Among Public Servants, Study Finds
France ranks last in a new global index measuring artificial intelligence adoption in government, with nearly half of its public servants reporting that they have never used AI at work, despite substantial government investment in the technology.
The Public Sector AI Adoption Index 2026, released on Monday by Public First for the Center for Data Innovation with support from Google, surveyed 3,335 civil servants across 10 countries, including the United States, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, Brazil, South Africa, India, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia. The study highlights a gap between ambitious AI strategies and actual implementation in European governments.
According to the index, 74 percent of French public servants said AI cannot perform any part of their work, and about 45 percent reported never using AI on the job. Only 27 percent noted that their organisations had invested in AI tools, and many said guidance from leadership on AI use was unclear.
“While France positions AI as a strategic tool for competitiveness and modernisation, without hands-on experience, its value remains abstract for many workers,” the report stated. Researchers warned that 70 percent of employees who actively use AI in organisations with limited guidance are doing so in “shadow” mode, meaning they operate AI tools without informing their employers.
Across Europe, adoption of AI in public services remains cautious. Germany and France were grouped as risk-averse countries, where AI is limited to specialists and pilot projects. The United Kingdom showed more progress, with 37 percent of public servants receiving AI training, but adoption remains uneven across departments and access to approved tools is limited.
By contrast, countries such as Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and India led the index. Public servants in these countries report widespread, everyday use of AI in government work, supported by clear leadership guidance and training programmes. Globally, 74 percent of public servants now use AI, and 80 percent say it empowers them, but only 18 percent believe their governments are using AI very effectively.
The survey assessed adoption across five areas: attitudes toward AI, confidence in using it, access to approved tools, integration of AI in daily work, and access to training. Experts said these factors determine whether governments can translate ambitious AI strategies into tangible improvements in public services.
“Many governments have ambitious plans for AI in the public sector, but some are creating better conditions for real‑world use than others,” said Rachel Wolf, CEO of Public First. “Our research shows who is succeeding and where improvement is needed. This matters because effective AI enables better public services, stronger outcomes for citizens, and more resilient public institutions.”
The findings raise questions about the effectiveness of France’s AI initiatives, which have included significant investment in infrastructure and ethical frameworks aimed at guiding responsible AI deployment in government. Analysts said closing the gap between strategy and practical use will be critical for the country to realise the benefits of AI for public services.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
