Tech
Wikipedia Challenges UK Online Safety Regulations Over Volunteer Privacy Concerns
The Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organisation behind Wikipedia, is set to appear before London’s Royal Courts of Justice on July 22 to contest the potential classification of the popular online encyclopedia under the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) as a “Category 1” service. The foundation argues that such a designation could severely impact the privacy, safety, and operations of its global community of volunteer contributors.
Under the OSA, Category 1 platforms—considered high-risk due to their scale and features—face extensive regulatory obligations, including user verification and stricter content moderation. The Wikimedia Foundation warns that enforcing such rules on Wikipedia would require it to identify thousands of its UK-based contributors, thereby compromising the anonymity that has been central to the platform’s functioning and editorial integrity.
In a statement released ahead of the hearing, the foundation said that complying with these rules could expose volunteers to risks such as data breaches, harassment, lawsuits, or even persecution in countries with repressive regimes. “This legal challenge is about protecting public interest projects online,” said Stephen LaPorte, General Counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation. “If the court rules in our favour, it could set a global precedent for safeguarding privacy and volunteer-led digital communities.”
The court case specifically targets a set of provisions known as the Categorisation Regulations, rather than the entirety of the Online Safety Act. These rules determine which services qualify as Category 1 and thus fall under the strictest oversight. Wikipedia’s massive traffic—estimated at over 11 billion global views monthly, including around 844 million from UK users—places it well within the threshold for designation.
Phil Bradley-Schmieg, Wikimedia’s lead counsel, acknowledged the importance of online safety regulation but emphasised that the current framework fails to distinguish between social media platforms and public interest projects like Wikipedia. “These regulations threaten to undermine Wikipedia’s open model by imposing burdensome verification and moderation requirements, which are incompatible with how our community operates,” he said.
The foundation also expressed concern over how the law could inadvertently hinder its algorithm-based tools—such as translation recommendations and the New Pages Feed—which are designed to improve content quality and moderation. Wikimedia contends that these features could be mistakenly interpreted as content recommendation systems under the OSA, making them subject to regulation despite their benign intent.
As the UK seeks to lead in regulating the digital landscape, the outcome of this case could have broader implications for how public interest websites are treated under new internet safety laws.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
