Tech
EU’s AI Code of Practice Delayed as Tech Giants Push for Simplicity
The European Commission’s long-anticipated voluntary Code of Practice on General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) has been delayed but is now expected to be published before August, according to officials. The code is intended to support compliance with the EU’s AI Act, particularly for developers of large language models and other general-purpose AI systems.
The delay comes amid growing pressure from major U.S. technology companies — including Amazon, IBM, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and OpenAI — who have urged the Commission to streamline the code. Minutes from a meeting held last week between the companies and Werner Stengg, a senior official in the cabinet of EU Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen, reveal calls for the code to avoid excessive complexity and administrative burden.
“The code should be as simple as possible, so as to avoid redundant reporting and unnecessary administrative burden,” the companies reportedly told Stengg. They also emphasized that the final version should offer a realistic timeline for implementation and remain within the scope of the AI Act.
Initially scheduled for release on May 2, the final draft was postponed after the Commission received requests for extended consultation periods. Over the past year, the Commission has held a series of workshops and plenary sessions involving around 1,000 participants, including industry experts and civil society representatives. Thirteen experts were formally appointed to contribute to the drafting process.
Previous iterations of the text have drawn criticism from multiple stakeholders. European publishers raised concerns over copyright implications, while tech companies warned that the proposals could hinder innovation. Cultural figures have also weighed in: ABBA’s Björn Ulvaeus, president of the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), recently cautioned lawmakers against yielding to Big Tech pressures that could erode creative rights.
Despite the delays, the Commission has stated it still aims to publish the revised code before summer. The timing is significant, as the rules related to general-purpose AI tools will enter into force on August 2. Meanwhile, the broader AI Act — which classifies AI systems according to risk levels — is being phased in and will become fully enforceable by 2027.
The forthcoming code is seen as an important step in shaping responsible AI development within the EU, even as debates continue over how best to balance innovation, regulation, and rights protection.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
