Tech
US Justice Department Sues Uber Over Disability Discrimination Claims
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against Uber, accusing the ride-hailing giant of discriminating against passengers with physical disabilities.
The complaint, lodged in federal court in San Francisco, alleges that Uber drivers “routinely refuse” to provide rides to disabled customers, including those accompanied by service animals or carrying foldable wheelchairs. It further claims that some riders have been subjected to cleaning fees for traveling with service animals or cancellation fees when drivers denied them service.
According to the DOJ, drivers also allegedly “insult and demean people with disabilities or ask them inappropriate questions,” creating additional barriers for passengers who depend on the platform for mobility. “Despite the importance of its services to people with disabilities, Uber denies people with disabilities full and equal enjoyment of its services in several critical ways,” the lawsuit states.
Uber has rejected the allegations. In a statement quoted by CNBC, the company said: “We have a clear zero-tolerance policy for confirmed service denials, and we fundamentally disagree with the DOJ’s allegation.”
This is not the first time Uber has faced scrutiny over accessibility. In 2022, the company agreed to pay $2.2 million to settle claims brought by the US government over its wait-time fees, which were found to unfairly penalize riders with disabilities.
The issue is not confined to the United States. In the United Kingdom, Paralympic table tennis player Jack Hunter-Spivey said in 2021 that Uber and other taxi drivers often drove away after realizing he used a wheelchair, a claim that highlighted the global challenges disabled passengers face when trying to access transport services.
The new lawsuit intensifies pressure on Uber, which has positioned itself as an essential service for millions of riders worldwide, including those with limited mobility. Disability advocates argue that the company has not done enough to ensure its services are accessible and reliable for all users.
The DOJ’s action underscores growing government scrutiny of how technology-driven transport services treat vulnerable groups. If the court rules against Uber, the case could result in further penalties and stricter requirements to improve accessibility measures.
As the case proceeds, Uber faces mounting questions about whether its policies and driver practices align with federal anti-discrimination laws designed to protect people with disabilities.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
