Connect with us

Tech

Activists Launch Campaign for EU-Funded Social Media Platform

Published

on

A group of activists has begun a campaign calling for the creation of a publicly funded European social media platform, after the European Commission formally registered a European Citizens’ Initiative on the proposal.

The registration allows organisers to begin collecting signatures across the European Union in support of the idea. Under the rules governing such initiatives, campaigners must gather at least one million signatures from citizens in a minimum of seven EU member states.

The signature drive is expected to take up to 12 months once it begins. Campaign organisers have up to six months to prepare the process before collecting support, meaning the entire effort could extend over roughly 18 months.

If the campaign reaches the required threshold, the European Commission would be required to consider the proposal and decide whether to draft legislation supporting the project.

The initiative reflects growing debate in Europe about the influence of global social media companies. Most of the world’s largest platforms are operated by companies based in the United States or China, and European policymakers have repeatedly criticised them over data protection, content moderation and broader social impacts.

Calls for a European alternative have intensified in recent years. The discussion gained momentum after Elon Musk purchased the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022. Since then, some European users have experimented with alternative platforms, although most have returned to larger networks because of their established user bases.

One example of a European-developed platform is Mastodon, which operates through a decentralised network of servers. Despite its presence in the market, it has not achieved the same level of global popularity as the largest social media services.

See also  EU's AI Code of Practice Delayed as Tech Giants Push for Simplicity

Supporters of the new proposal argue that a European platform funded by society could offer a different model. According to the initiative’s description, the network would operate as a service designed for the public and would be overseen by society rather than private owners.

Campaign organisers say such a platform could remain independent from political pressure while protecting the rights of users and promoting fair treatment for all participants.

Even if the initiative succeeds in gathering the required signatures, many practical questions remain. It is unclear whether the project would involve building an entirely new platform or supporting existing services. The timeline for development is also uncertain because any new legislation would still need to pass through the EU’s lawmaking process.

If approved, the project would likely require a procurement process before development begins. This step alone could take significant time.

The cost of the proposed platform is another key issue. Organisers estimate that developing and operating the network could cost about one euro per citizen each year. Across the European Union, that would amount to roughly €450 million annually.

They argue that such a contribution would represent a small expense for individual citizens while providing Europe with a digital platform designed specifically for public interests. Whether EU institutions and member states would agree to fund such a project remains an open question.

Tech

Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety

Published

on

More than 100 international organisations have called on governments to hold artificial intelligence companies directly responsible for protecting children online, warning that existing regulatory approaches are failing to prevent harm.

The appeal, led by the children’s rights organisation 5Rights Foundation and supported by groups including Amnesty International and Save the Children, was issued ahead of the United Nations’ first Global Dialogue on AI Governance. The coalition argues that governments should require technology companies to prove their AI systems are safe for children before they are made publicly available.

The organisations said artificial intelligence is already affecting children in harmful ways and that current regulations often respond only after damage has occurred.

Leanda Barrington-Leach, executive director of the 5Rights Foundation, said children are not opposed to technological progress but want stronger safeguards in place before products reach the market.

“They aren’t asking us to block AI innovation, but it shouldn’t be a case of cleaning up the mess after harm has happened either,” she said.

The statement comes as legal challenges involving AI companies continue to grow. Firms including Character Technologies and OpenAI have faced lawsuits over allegations that AI-powered chatbots, particularly “companion” bots designed to simulate emotional relationships, can negatively affect children. Some claims also argue that these products have been presented as suitable for younger users without sufficient warnings about potential risks.

The coalition believes governments should focus on the commercial incentives that encourage companies to prioritise rapid product development and user engagement over safety.

Among the recommendations are mandatory safety assessments before AI products are released, financial penalties for companies whose systems violate children’s rights, bans on design features that exploit children’s psychological vulnerabilities, and restrictions on the commercial use of children’s images, voices and biometric data.

See also  AI Trends in 2026: World Models, Small Language Models, and Rising Concerns Over Safety and Regulation

The organisations maintain that governments do not need entirely new legislation to introduce these protections. Instead, they argue that countries should enforce commitments already made under international agreements, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Global Digital Compact, which outlines principles for protecting human rights in the digital environment.

Barrington-Leach said stronger accountability is needed to change how AI products are developed and marketed.

“As long as companies are rewarded for speed, engagement and data extraction rather than safety, we’ll keep treating the symptoms while the disease becomes endemic,” she said. She added that respecting children’s rights should become a fundamental requirement for technology companies rather than a voluntary commitment.

The United Nations’ inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance is expected to bring together government representatives, technology companies, researchers and civil society organisations to discuss international standards for artificial intelligence. Child safety is likely to be one of the key topics as policymakers seek to balance technological innovation with stronger protections for vulnerable users.

Continue Reading

Tech

Study Says EU Regulations Are Slowing Rollout of Advanced AI Models

Published

on

A new study by Governance.AI has found that European Union regulations are delaying the rollout of advanced artificial intelligence models, with technology companies increasingly pointing to the bloc’s regulatory framework as a key obstacle to launching new AI products in Europe.

The report examined 375 large language models (LLMs) released between June 2018 and May 2026, comparing their availability across the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom. According to the findings, at least 11 percent of advanced AI model releases were either delayed or never launched in the EU compared with the United States. In the UK, the figure stood at 7 percent.

Researchers said they identified 68 cases in which AI models experienced delays or were withheld from specific markets. Regulatory factors were cited as the primary reason in 56 of those cases, making them the most common cause of restricted availability.

The study reviewed releases from major AI developers, including Meta, Google, OpenAI and Anthropic. Meta recorded the highest proportion of delayed or unavailable releases, with 26 percent of its AI models delayed or withheld in the EU and 15 percent in the UK. Anthropic’s Claude 3 Opus was highlighted as one example, with its web application arriving in the EU 71 days later than in the United States.

According to the report, data protection rules have emerged as the biggest regulatory hurdle, particularly for AI systems capable of processing images, audio and real-time video rather than text alone.

The researchers argued that uncertainty surrounding the application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to AI model training and deployment has created additional challenges for developers. They also said enforcement of data protection rules has generally been stricter within the EU than in the UK, despite both jurisdictions sharing similar legal foundations following the adoption of the GDPR before Britain’s exit from the bloc.

See also  US Tech Giants Brace for Fallout from Trump’s H-1B Visa Fee Hike as UK, China Court Global Talent

The report noted that the full impact of newer legislation, including the Digital Markets Act, which began taking effect in 2023, and the Artificial Intelligence Act, adopted in 2024, has yet to be fully reflected in the data.

At the same time, the European Union is reviewing proposals aimed at making data rules more practical for AI development through its Digital Omnibus initiative. Lawmakers are also considering changes to copyright legislation and the AI Act’s copyright provisions to strengthen protections for creators, measures that researchers say could affect future AI model availability if implemented too strictly.

John Lidiard, a UK AI policy researcher and one of the report’s authors, said policymakers should consider the impact that regulatory barriers can have on businesses and consumers seeking access to the latest AI technologies. He said balancing innovation with effective oversight would remain a key challenge as governments continue to develop AI regulations.

Continue Reading

Tech

French Startups Face Political Uncertainty as AI Reshapes Innovation Landscape

Published

on

France’s startup ecosystem is undergoing a period of rapid change, driven by the rise of artificial intelligence and growing concerns about the country’s political future, according to new figures released by startup incubator Station F as it marks its ninth anniversary.

The Paris-based campus, regarded as the world’s largest startup incubator, has supported more than 9,000 startups since opening in 2017. Companies that emerged from the hub include Hugging Face, Pasqal and Pollen Robotics.

New data from Station F shows artificial intelligence has become a dominant force among resident startups. This year, the incubator launched its F/AI programme, attracting major AI firms, including Mistral AI.

According to the survey, 77 percent of startups said AI tools have reduced their hiring needs. Despite that, 82 percent reported they are either actively recruiting or expect to hire employees in the coming months.

One of the most widely used AI tools among startups at the campus is Anthropic’s Claude model, now used by 90 percent of teams. The result marks a major shift from last year when OpenAI held the leading position among AI providers at the incubator.

AI-related acquisitions have also become increasingly common. Earlier this year, cloud computing startup Koyeb was acquired by Mistral AI. Previous deals included the acquisition of Pollen Robotics by Hugging Face, reflecting continued consolidation within the sector.

The profile of startup founders is also changing. Station F reported that the average founder is now 36.5 years old, compared with 31 in 2018. Around 20 percent hold doctoral degrees, suggesting that technical expertise is playing a larger role in attracting investment and building companies.

See also  EU's AI Code of Practice Delayed as Tech Giants Push for Simplicity

The report also found that startup ambitions have shifted. Half of founders expect their businesses to end in acquisitions rather than public listings. Only 9 percent believe their companies will eventually launch an initial public offering, down from 16 percent a year earlier.

International talent remains a key feature of the campus. Roughly one-third of residents come from outside France, with more than 60 nationalities represented. After France, the largest foreign groups come from the United States, Morocco, Germany, the United Kingdom, Algeria and India.

Despite continued growth, political uncertainty has emerged as a significant concern. More than half of founders surveyed said France’s upcoming presidential election is among their biggest worries. Nearly half expressed concern about a possible far-right victory, while about a quarter were worried about a far-left outcome.

Many entrepreneurs cited immigration policy as a major issue, warning that tighter visa rules could make it harder to attract global talent and build internationally competitive businesses.

The findings highlight a startup sector that remains innovative and internationally connected, but increasingly focused on the political environment shaping its future.

Continue Reading

Trending