Tech
Record 4,325 Submissions Reveal Sharp Divide Over EU’s Digital Fairness Act
The European Commission’s public consultation on the proposed Digital Fairness Act (DFA) has drawn a record 4,325 submissions, underscoring a growing divide between Europe’s business community and publicly funded non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
The high volume of feedback — boosted by hundreds of gamers concerned about the Act’s potential impact — reflects the controversy surrounding the Commission’s plans to tighten rules on digital consumer protection. While most business groups have opposed the proposal, many civic organisations have voiced strong support.
The DFA, spearheaded by Irish Commissioner Michael McGrath, aims to modernise EU consumer laws to address issues unique to the digital economy. Its current scope includes regulating “dark patterns” (manipulative online design), misleading influencer marketing, “addictive” digital product designs, and unfair personalisation practices.
Critics warn, however, that vague definitions — particularly of “addictive design” and “dark patterns” — could allow regulators to target digital platforms arbitrarily. Businesses also fear that the Act could amount to a de facto ban on personalised advertising, a change that would reshape the EU’s digital economy.
Leading European firms, including Wolt, Ryanair, Vinted, and Spotify, have urged the Commission to prioritise enforcement of existing rules rather than layering new regulations. They argue that over-regulation could drive up advertising costs, reduce reach for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and make ads less relevant for consumers.
“Europe’s digital champions are asking for balance,” said one industry representative. “We already have some of the world’s strictest consumer and data protection laws — what we need now is consistent enforcement, not another layer of complexity.”
Indeed, the EU already enforces a wide array of digital regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Digital Services Act (DSA), Digital Markets Act (DMA), and the Consumer Rights Directive. Many stakeholders argue that the real challenge lies in fragmented enforcement across member states, not in the absence of rules.
The Commission has justified the DFA by citing an estimated €7.9 billion in annual financial harm to consumers from online problems. However, business groups counter that the figure has not been weighed against the economic benefits of personalised advertising, which they say contributes over €25 billion to EU GDP and supports around 600,000 jobs.
Proponents of stricter regulation argue that Europeans are increasingly concerned about how their personal data is used online. Yet studies suggest most consumers still prefer relevant, personalised ads. As the Commission prepares its impact assessment, both sides are calling for a more balanced evaluation of consumer interests and economic realities.
The Digital Fairness Act remains in early stages, but with thousands of submissions and mounting scrutiny, the debate over the future of digital consumer protection in Europe is only just beginning.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
