Iran’s apparent erratic strikes all over the Gulf and now Azerbaijan, together with its stranglehold of the vital Strait of Hormuz, have resulted in a growing strain on the world’s global energy supplies with incalculable consequences ahead. During the US-Israeli military buildup preceding the war that erupted one week ago, Iran repeatedly warned it would retaliate if attacked, promising widespread disruption.

Since the conflict began last Saturday, Tehran has expanded its aerial campaign across the Gulf and, on Thursday, extended attacks to Azerbaijan. While Iranian officials claim the strikes target only US and Israeli interests, missiles and drones have also hit the Gulf’s energy infrastructure, essential to global supply chains, and disrupted shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz, where roughly 20% of the world’s oil passes. Lloyd’s List reported that more than 200 ships remain stranded due to restricted movement in the strait.

Qatar halted liquefied natural gas (LNG) production at its top facilities in Mesaieed and Ras Laffan Industrial City after drone attacks, sending shockwaves through global energy markets. Qatar’s LNG supplies account for around 20% of the world’s total and play a key role in balancing demand across Asia and Europe. Iranian strikes also forced Saudi Arabia’s largest oil refinery to suspend operations, while Iraqi oil production and Israeli gas fields suffered disruptions. Dubai’s ports, among the world’s busiest, were reportedly impacted as well.

The UK Foreign Office said Friday that while the tempo of Iranian missile and drone strikes has slowed since the war’s early days, their focus is increasingly on economic and energy targets. In an interview with the Financial Times, Qatar’s Energy Minister Saad al-Kaabi warned the conflict “could bring down the economies of the world,” adding that continued hostilities would push energy prices higher and trigger shortages affecting industries worldwide.

Experts highlight the potential for a wider economic impact if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. Dr. Yousef Alshammari, president of the London College of Energy Economics, told Euronews that such a blockade “could trigger a global recession if it continues,” citing potential political pressure from China, a major consumer of Iranian oil.

Former US ambassador to Azerbaijan Matthew Bryza criticized Iran’s attack on Azerbaijan as lacking strategic logic, noting that Tehran’s actions “don’t make much sense in terms of a coherent, rational military plan.” Bryza suggested that some strikes may reflect decisions by lower-level commanders following directives from Iran’s supreme leader to delegate military authority if senior officials were killed, rather than a coordinated strategy.

The ongoing strikes have caused oil and gas prices to surge, with European gas already up more than 50%, and global markets remain on high alert. Analysts warn that disruptions could escalate further, amplifying the economic toll and keeping international energy markets under pressure as the conflict continues.

Economists are warning that the ongoing war in Iran could have severe consequences for the euro and the European economy if the conflict continues beyond the “four weeks” projected by former US President Donald Trump. The hostilities, which began at the end of February, have already triggered an energy price shock, affecting oil, petrol, diesel, and gas. Rising energy costs are hitting consumers and energy-intensive industries such as chemicals and steel, putting additional pressure on the German economy, which was already facing modest growth forecasts.

The euro, currently trading around $1.16, is under particular pressure. Economist Daniel Stelter warned that an extended conflict would further weaken a euro already affected by low growth, high debt, and political uncertainty. “Capital would flow into dollar investments considered safe,” he said. Carsten Brzeski, chief economist at ING Bank, added that if the conflict disrupts oil supplies through the Strait of Hormuz for several weeks, oil prices could exceed $100 per barrel, pushing the euro down to $1.10–$1.12 per dollar. This would represent a 5–8 percent drop, the lowest levels since the 2022–23 energy crisis triggered by the Ukraine war.

Such a decline would make holidays in the US more expensive for Europeans and increase the cost of imports such as oil, electronics, and raw materials. Stelter warned of even more severe scenarios, suggesting that the euro could temporarily fall below parity with the dollar, reaching $0.90–$0.95, if the war leads to prolonged regional instability.

Germany could face particularly serious economic consequences. Stelter said higher energy prices act like an additional tax, reducing consumption and investment. In a prolonged blockade scenario, Germany could fall into a deep recession, with the wider eurozone at risk of at least a technical recession. Extended disruptions would also strain bond markets and interest rates, potentially forcing the European Central Bank (ECB) to intervene more aggressively to prevent a debt crisis.

The war’s impact on global energy supplies could trigger an “energy black swan,” causing sudden shortages and price spikes that ripple through the global economy. German exports could collapse despite a weaker euro if higher energy prices reduce demand in major markets such as China, India, and the US.

The ECB faces a complex challenge: if the conflict is short-lived, it could lower interest rates to support growth. If the war drags on, inflationary pressures from energy prices would limit the bank’s ability to cut rates, leaving the euro under pressure and economic momentum stalled. Stelter said this scenario could lead to stagflation, with rising inflation and falling growth simultaneously.

A rapid end to hostilities within four to five weeks and minimal damage to critical energy infrastructure in Saudi Arabia and Qatar could help stabilize the euro. However, resistance from Iran’s leadership raises the risk of a prolonged conflict with serious economic implications for Europe.