Connect with us

News

Russia Intensifies Drone Assaults as Ukraine Faces New Threats Amidst Trump’s Reelection

Published

on

Russia has ramped up its drone strike campaign against Ukraine in what officials are describing as an attempt to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that Russia’s drone attacks have multiplied nearly tenfold compared to last fall, as Moscow increases pressure on Ukraine’s frontlines in the east.

These intensified strikes are employing a new tactic: decoy drones. According to Yuriy Ihnat, a spokesperson for Ukraine’s air defense, Russian forces are launching drones equipped with “3D-printed balls wrapped in foil” instead of warheads. These decoys mimic the appearance of Iran-made Shahed-136 drones and are designed to mislead Ukrainian air defenses into targeting them rather than drones carrying lethal warheads. “As many as half of the drones launched by Russia are now decoys,” Ihnat told CNN, noting that these decoy drones are cheaper and easier to produce.

Since September, Kyiv residents have endured nightly attacks, with air raid sirens piercing through the city for hours at a time. According to the city’s military administration head, Serhiy Popko, explosions from Russian drones injured at least two people and damaged several buildings in a significant wave of attacks earlier this week. Popko stated that the drones attacked “in waves, from different directions” and varied altitudes, posing a significant challenge for air defense systems.

“Their goal is to break us morally,” said Vadym Naustinov, a 32-year-old Kyiv resident. Naustinov has devised a personal strategy to cope with the near-constant air attacks, rushing to the subway for safety when he hears drones or explosions approaching. “If the explosions are closer, I hide in the corridor or bathroom and wait,” he explained.

See also  EU Unveils Industrial Plan to Prioritise European Production and Limit Chinese Access

As Ukrainian forces face a relentless Russian offensive on the eastern front, the political climate in the United States has added another layer of uncertainty for Kyiv. With Donald Trump’s recent victory in the U.S. presidential election, questions loom over continued American support for Ukraine. Throughout his campaign, Trump questioned the U.S. commitment to aiding Ukraine, at one point suggesting Kyiv should have “given up a little bit” to Moscow.

In response to Trump’s win, Zelensky congratulated the president-elect and highlighted his appreciation for Trump’s “peace through strength” philosophy. Zelensky recalled their September meeting in which they discussed the Ukraine-U.S. strategic partnership and a “Victory Plan” to counter Russian aggression. “I appreciate the support and commitment to true peace,” Zelensky wrote on social media.

Meanwhile, Ukraine marked the third month of its bold cross-border incursion into Russia’s Kursk region, a tactic designed to divert Russian forces from the eastern frontlines. Zelensky has framed the incursion as part of Ukraine’s larger strategy to shift the momentum of the war. “True peace is achieved by those who are truly brave,” he said, underscoring Ukraine’s resolve.

To counter Ukraine’s incursion, Russian President Vladimir Putin has strengthened his military’s ranks with North Korean forces. According to U.S. officials, up to 10,000 North Korean troops have been deployed to Russia’s Kursk region and are expected to enter combat against Ukrainian forces soon, signaling an intensifying alliance between Moscow and Pyongyang.

The rapidly evolving conflict underscores the mounting pressures on Ukraine both at home and abroad as Russia amplifies its offensive tactics and Ukraine faces new challenges in securing critical international support.

News

EU Must End ‘Naivety’ on Trade and Confront China’s Industrial Strategy, Says French Minister

Published

on

France’s Minister for Foreign Trade, Nicolas Forissier, has called on the European Union to abandon what he described as “naivety” in its approach to global trade, urging a tougher stance on countries accused of distorting markets through industrial policy and trade practices.

Speaking in an interview with Euronews’ 12 Minutes With programme, Forissier said Europe must respond more firmly to what he described as the weaponisation of trade dependencies, warning that China in particular could damage its own long-term interests by undermining European industry.

“The Chinese have to understand that they won’t win anything if they destroy the European industry and then the European market, which is an essential market for them,” he said. “We must no longer be naive.”

His comments come as the European Commission prepares to hold an “orientation debate” next week on how to respond to a surge of low-cost Chinese imports. The discussion is expected to shape possible new trade defence measures, with further talks likely when EU leaders meet in Brussels in mid-June.

Forissier said the shift in thinking was not limited to China alone but applied to any country using commercial leverage to gain strategic advantage. “It is not only China,” he said. “It is all the countries that weaponise trade.”

Among the proposals under consideration is a requirement for EU companies to diversify supply chains, sourcing components from at least three different suppliers in order to reduce dependency on any single foreign market. Asked whether he supported such a measure, Forissier replied: “Yes, we have to.”

See also  Belgium Faces Widespread Disruption as Three-Day Strike Ends

Other options include targeted tariffs on sensitive industries such as chemicals, alongside stronger use of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tools to counter imports priced below domestic market levels. These measures are designed to address concerns over overcapacity in China’s industrial sector and its impact on European manufacturers.

The debate is taking place against a backdrop of widening trade imbalances. EU goods imports from China exceeded exports by €359.3 billion in 2025, marking an increase of nearly 20% compared with the previous year.

China has already warned it could retaliate if the bloc imposes new restrictions, raising concerns about potential escalation in trade tensions between two of the world’s largest economies.

France has repeatedly pushed for a more assertive European trade policy, arguing that state subsidies, export controls on raw materials and industrial overproduction in major economies are distorting global markets.

Forissier stressed that Europe must maintain open dialogue with Beijing while defending its own industrial base. “We try to respect the Chinese,” he said. “The Chinese have to respect us, and this is the message European institutions have to send.”

Continue Reading

News

US Says Iran Talks ‘Borderline’ as Pakistan Pushes Diplomacy Amid War Tensions

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has said ongoing negotiations over the conflict involving Iran are teetering on the “borderline” between reaching a diplomatic agreement and a return to renewed military strikes, as tensions continue to rise across the region.

The remarks came as Pakistan’s army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran for fresh talks aimed at de-escalating the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. His visit follows a series of high-level diplomatic engagements involving Pakistani officials and Iranian leadership in recent days.

Munir was received in Tehran by Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, alongside Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who has also travelled to the Iranian capital multiple times this week for meetings with senior officials.

Despite the renewed diplomatic activity, Iran has downplayed expectations of a breakthrough. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the visit did not signal any decisive shift in negotiations, describing the differences between the parties as “deep and extensive,” according to Iran’s ISNA news agency.

Speaking at a NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there had been limited progress in the discussions but cautioned against optimism.

“There’s a little bit of movement and that’s good,” Rubio said, adding that he did not want to exaggerate developments. He also warned that Washington retains “other options” if diplomacy fails, echoing Trump’s earlier comments that military action remains on the table if Iran does not agree to terms.

Trump has previously stated that he paused consideration of a strike due to what he described as “serious negotiations” taking place, but has repeatedly warned that the fragile ceasefire reached in mid-April could collapse.

See also  Ireland’s Venture Capital Investment Rises in Q4 Amid Global Challenges

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran remained committed to talks despite what he called repeated breaches of diplomacy by Washington. He said Iran was participating “with a responsible approach and with all seriousness” in an effort to secure what he described as a fair outcome, according to Iranian state media.

A key point of contention remains the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime route through which a significant share of global oil and gas supplies pass. Iranian actions in the waterway and US responses have heightened fears of wider economic disruption.

Iran has effectively restricted access through the strait, while US Central Command has reportedly blocked Iranian ports and redirected commercial vessels since mid-April. The European Union has since expanded its sanctions framework targeting those involved, calling the blockade contrary to international law.

Rubio said allied nations were also discussing contingency plans in case negotiations fail, warning that the situation may require a “plan B” if diplomatic efforts collapse.

Continue Reading

News

US Green Card Rule Change Forces Most Applicants to Apply From Abroad

Published

on

A sweeping policy change in the United States has upended a long-standing immigration process, requiring most foreign nationals seeking green cards to leave the country and complete their applications from abroad.

Under the new directive issued Friday by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), individuals in the United States on temporary visas — including work, student and tourist permits — will generally no longer be able to adjust their status to permanent residency while remaining in the country. Instead, they must return to their home countries and apply through US consulates, except in limited “extraordinary circumstances.”

USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said the policy was intended to realign the immigration system with its original framework.

“From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances,” Kahler said. He added that the change would reduce incentives for people to remain in the US after visa denials.

The decision marks a significant departure from decades of practice, under which many migrants have been allowed to apply for permanent residency from within the United States. That pathway has been commonly used by spouses of US citizens, workers, students, and individuals with family ties in the country.

The process of obtaining a green card often takes months or even years, raising concerns that applicants may now be forced to leave jobs, homes and families while waiting for approval abroad.

Immigration attorneys and advocacy groups said they were still assessing the scope of the policy and how it would be enforced. Many also warned that practical barriers could make compliance difficult, particularly for applicants from countries where travel is restricted or where US consular services are limited or unavailable.

See also  Qatar Airways Flight Turbulence Incident Caused 12 Injured During Doha to Ireland Journey

Shev Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association said the move appeared to disrupt established procedures. “USCIS is trying to upend decades of processing of adjustment of status,” she said, noting widespread uncertainty over who would be affected.

Jessie De Haven of the California Immigration Project said the policy could discourage eligible applicants from proceeding altogether. “It’s really hard to tell how this is going to be applied,” she said. “I do think it might have a chilling effect on people applying.”

The announcement forms part of a broader immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, which has sought to tighten legal pathways while increasing enforcement measures against irregular migration.

Officials have framed the change as an effort to close loopholes and strengthen oversight of the immigration system. Critics, however, argue it could lead to prolonged separations for families and create new obstacles for lawful immigrants seeking permanent residency in the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending