Connect with us

Health

EU Unveils Critical Medicines Act to Secure Drug Supply, But Key Questions Remain

Published

on

The European Commission has introduced the Critical Medicines Act, a major initiative aimed at strengthening the EU’s access to essential medicines. The proposal, unveiled this week, seeks to reduce dependency on non-EU suppliers, enhance joint procurement, and encourage European production. However, questions remain over its funding, stockpiling strategy, and potential trade risks.

‘Buy European’ Proposal Raises Trade Concerns

One of the Act’s most debated measures is the ‘Buy European’ rule, which would prioritize suppliers manufacturing a significant portion of critical medicines within the EU. The goal is to ensure a more reliable drug supply, but critics warn that this protectionist approach could trigger retaliation from global trade partners.

EU Health Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi defended the policy, calling it “a necessary step for public health security.” However, comparisons have been drawn to China’s ‘Buy China’ policy, which the EU itself has criticized for restricting foreign suppliers. If the EU moves forward with this approach, it could face trade tensions and reduced market access abroad.

Boosting European Production Without Full Relocation

The proposal also aims to reduce reliance on non-EU pharmaceutical production by promoting increased manufacturing within Europe. However, rather than requiring production to be strictly within EU borders, the plan emphasizes bilateral partnerships with neighboring countries such as the UK, Switzerland, and EU candidate nations.

“I rely on our closest neighbors to help bring production closer to the EU,” said Várhelyi, suggesting that strategic supply chain diversification is the Commission’s preferred approach over full relocation.

Funding Challenges Could Limit Impact

A key concern surrounding the Act is funding constraints. The Commission has allocated €83 million for 2026-2027, primarily from the EU4Health program. However, this budget is too small to support large-scale manufacturing shifts, raising doubts about the proposal’s effectiveness.

See also  Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Offer New Hope in the Fight Against Malaria

While additional funding could come from Horizon Europe and the Digital Europe Programme, 11 EU health ministers have called for defense funding to include medicine production, an idea that Várhelyi rejected. Instead, the Commission is loosening state aid restrictions, encouraging member states to fund production efforts themselves.

Strengthening Joint Drug Procurement

To improve purchasing efficiency, the Act enhances the EU’s joint procurement mechanism. Traditionally, the Commission and at least nine member states negotiate as a single bloc to secure better pricing and supply terms. The new proposal expands this approach, allowing the Commission to act as a central buyer upon request.

Additionally, a cross-border procurement model will be introduced, where the Commission provides logistical and administrative support to individual member states handling their own drug purchases.

Stockpiling Strategy Left Out

One of the biggest gaps in the proposal is the lack of a coordinated stockpiling framework. The Critical Medicine Alliance had recommended a harmonized EU-wide contingency stock, ensuring member states share supplies during shortages.

However, this was omitted from the final proposal, sparking concerns of fragmented and inequitable stockpiling across the bloc. Croatian MEP Tomislav Sokol warned that larger countries hoarding supplies at the expense of smaller nations must not happen again.

What’s Next?

As the Critical Medicines Act moves into the legislative process, MEPs are expected to push for amendments, particularly to address stockpiling coordination and funding gaps. While the proposal marks a major step toward securing Europe’s medicine supply, unresolved questions could shape its final impact in the coming months.

Health

Study Finds Weight-Loss Drugs May Protect Heart After Attack

Published

on

Weight-loss medications commonly prescribed for diabetes and obesity may also help patients recover after a heart attack by improving blood flow and reducing the risk of complications, according to new research.

A study led by scientists at Bristol Medical School found that GLP-1 receptor agonists can help prevent further damage to heart tissue following emergency treatment. The findings were published in the journal Nature Communications.

“In nearly half of all heart attack patients, tiny blood vessels within the heart muscle remain narrowed, even after the main artery is cleared during emergency medical treatment,” said lead author Svetlana Mastitskaya. This condition, known as “no-reflow,” prevents oxygen-rich blood from reaching parts of the heart, increasing the risk of long-term damage.

The research team conducted experiments in rodents and tested their results using cultivated human heart cells. They found that GLP-1 drugs improved blood flow by activating potassium channels and relaxing pericytes, the muscle cells that surround small blood vessels in the heart. When these cells relax, constricted vessels can widen, allowing blood to circulate more effectively.

GLP-1 receptor agonists mimic a hormone produced naturally in the body that helps regulate blood sugar and appetite. They are widely used to treat type 2 diabetes and to promote weight loss by helping patients feel full for longer periods.

Previous studies have shown that people taking GLP-1 medications have a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases, including heart attacks and strokes. In 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of Wegovy, a semaglutide-based GLP-1 drug, to reduce the risk of stroke, heart attack and other cardiovascular conditions.

See also  Senior Doctors in England Accept Pay Offer, Ending Dispute

Clinical trials have indicated that the heart benefits of these medications appear to be independent of the amount of weight lost. Patients taking the drugs experienced fewer heart attacks and strokes regardless of whether they were mildly overweight or severely obese.

Researchers believe GLP-1 drugs may lower cardiovascular risk by reducing inflammation, improving blood pressure control, lowering cholesterol and other blood fats, and supporting the health of blood vessels.

Despite these promising findings, experts stress that medication alone is not enough. A recent study from Harvard University found that patients with type 2 diabetes who combined GLP-1 treatment with healthy lifestyle habits saw significantly greater heart health benefits. Those who followed eight key habits, including a balanced diet, regular exercise, adequate sleep and avoiding smoking, had a 60 percent lower risk compared with those who followed one or none.

Frank Hu, one of the study’s authors, said the results show that healthy living remains central to reducing cardiovascular risk, even with modern drug therapies.

Continue Reading

Health

Greenland Responds to US Claims, Emphasizes Need for Foreign Healthcare Staff

Published

on

Greenland’s government has highlighted the need to strengthen its health system and recruit foreign healthcare professionals following a statement from US President Donald Trump suggesting patients in the territory are not receiving adequate care. On 22 February, Trump posted on Truth Social that he planned to send a hospital ship to Greenland “to take care of the many people who are sick and not being taken care of there.”

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen rejected the offer, stressing that the country provides free healthcare for all residents, a service the United States cannot replicate. Yet Trump’s comments reflect ongoing challenges in staffing Greenland’s healthcare sector.

The territory has long struggled to recruit and retain medical professionals. In response, the government has introduced measures to ease residence permits for foreign healthcare workers. Anna Wangenheim, Minister of Health and Persons with Disabilities, stated on Facebook that Greenland is actively working to strengthen its healthcare system and is seeking more international professionals. She added that help from any country, including the United States, would be welcome if healthcare workers respect local patients, language, and culture.

Greenland, home to more than 56,000 people as of January 2026, is the world’s least densely populated territory. Around 20,000 live in the capital, Nuuk, while the rest reside in scattered towns and settlements, presenting unique logistical challenges for healthcare delivery.

The territory’s health burden remains high. In 2023, Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) per 100,000 residents stood at 38,715, higher than Denmark’s 30,931 and the European average of 36,863. About 1.5% of the population had cancer and nearly 19% suffered from mental health disorders, both above EU averages. Life expectancy also lags behind Europe, with newborn boys expected to live 69.3 years and girls 73.9 years, compared with the European average of 81.7 years.

See also  Trump Administration Launches Controversial Health Data-Sharing Initiative

Greenland’s health system operates across 70 locations with roughly 120 medical positions—only half of which are permanent—and 300 nursing roles, two-thirds permanent. Services are divided into five regions, each served by a regional hospital, with Queen Ingrid’s Hospital in Nuuk acting as both a regional and national facility. More advanced procedures, such as radiotherapy or invasive cardiology, require travel to Denmark.

Telemedicine has helped bridge geographic gaps. Hansen, a medical advisor at Greenland’s Department of Health, noted that skin diseases can now be diagnosed remotely with support from Denmark. In 2023, the territory launched the app Puisa to provide secure video consultations for residents in remote areas, reducing the need for long travel.

While Greenland’s healthcare system covers basic medical needs, officials acknowledge that infrastructure and staffing limits restrict the delivery of specialized treatments locally. The government continues to seek international staff to enhance services and meet the challenges of a dispersed population.

Continue Reading

Health

Eli Lilly’s Oral Pill Shows Strong Weight Loss Results in Clinical Trials

Published

on

Eli Lilly’s new oral pill, orforglipron, has demonstrated up to 8% weight loss in clinical trials, outperforming existing oral semaglutide alternatives. The results signal growing competition in the weight-loss drug market, where demand for convenient and effective treatments continues to rise.

The trial, published in The Lancet, involved more than 1,600 participants with type 2 diabetes across over 130 research centres in five countries. Participants were assigned to different doses of orforglipron, ranging from 12mg to 36mg, or equivalent doses of oral semaglutide for one year.

Results showed that roughly 60% of those taking orforglipron lost at least 5% of their body weight, compared with 40% of participants on semaglutide. Between 28% and 44% of patients on orforglipron lost 10% or more, while only 13% to 21% of those on semaglutide reached similar reductions. Participants also experienced improved blood sugar control, with orforglipron lowering glucose levels more effectively than its competitor.

Experts welcomed the results but urged caution. Naveed Sattar, professor of cardiometabolic medicine at the University of Glasgow, said oral medications that help patients lose weight and maintain it are vital, noting that excess weight is a key driver of type 2 diabetes and associated cardiovascular risks. Marie Spreckley, a weight management researcher at Cambridge University, highlighted that while the trial showed benefits, side effects and long-term safety remain important considerations.

Adverse effects were more common among orforglipron users. Approximately 9-10% of participants stopped the treatment due to gastrointestinal issues, compared with about 5% of those on semaglutide. Spreckley noted that these effects could affect real-world tolerability outside the trial environment and called for further research on long-term outcomes, including cardiovascular health and sustained effectiveness.

See also  Gout Drug Could Show Promise in Fighting COVID-19

Orforglipron is designed as a daily pill that does not require food or water restrictions, offering a more convenient alternative to injectable treatments such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro. Eli Lilly, which also markets Zepbound and Mounjaro, is positioning orforglipron as a competitor to Novo Nordisk, the current provider of the only approved oral GLP-1 pill.

The pill is under review by the US Food and Drug Administration. If approved, Eli Lilly said US patients with obesity could access the drug starting at $149 (€125.92) for the lowest dose, with higher doses priced up to $399 (€337) if insurance does not cover the cost.

As pharmaceutical companies race to make weight-loss treatments more accessible, orforglipron’s strong results highlight the potential of oral GLP-1 therapies to reshape the market, even as questions about side effects and long-term safety remain.

Continue Reading

Trending