Connect with us

News

Survey Reveals Major Gaps in Disaster Preparedness Across Europe

Published

on

A new Eurobarometer survey has uncovered alarming gaps in disaster preparedness across Europe, with Southern European countries particularly lagging in awareness and readiness. Despite the increasing frequency of climate-related disasters, fewer than four in ten Europeans feel well-prepared for emergencies, and even fewer—just 9%—know about their city or region’s disaster response plans.

Lack of Awareness and Communication Gaps

The survey, conducted in early 2024 with over 26,000 participants across the EU, found that public knowledge of emergency procedures varies widely. Only 2% of respondents in Malta and Greece reported being informed about their local disaster response plans, compared to 20% in Sweden and 19% in Finland.

The disparity is stark but not surprising. In Sweden and Finland, at least one in five people have participated in emergency preparedness training. In contrast, many Southern European nations report low levels of confidence in their ability to handle disasters, despite being highly exposed to climate-related hazards like wildfires, heatwaves, and floods.

“The event was neither unexpected nor adequately prepared for,” said Professor David Alexander, an expert in emergency management at University College London, referring to the Valencia floods of October 2023, which claimed over 200 lives. He noted that while meteorological warnings were issued, poor administrative response and public awareness led to devastating consequences.

Who Feels Most—and Least—Prepared?

The survey also assessed how prepared Europeans feel on a personal level. Only 37% of EU citizens consider themselves well-prepared for disasters, while 58% do not.

Confidence levels vary significantly by country:

  • Slovenia ranks the highest, with 65% of respondents feeling prepared. The country has a strong culture of community resilience, with 31% of Slovenians engaging in volunteer work related to disaster preparedness.
  • Southern Europe lags behind, with Portugal (27%), Greece (28%), Spain (29%), and Italy (34%) reporting the lowest confidence levels.
  • Western and Central European nations such as France (30%) and the Netherlands (31%) also scored below 40%.
  • Only five EU countries have a majority of citizens who feel well-prepared, with Slovenia being the only one above 60%.
See also  Ukrainian Women Turn to Art to Cope with War’s Devastating Losses

A Disconnect Between Perception and Reality

Despite these low confidence levels, the survey suggests that self-reported preparedness does not always reflect actual capability.

“People commonly overestimate their own resilience,” said Professor Alexander, pointing to studies where individuals assumed they could manage floods simply by waiting upstairs—without considering the loss of electricity, heating, or water supply.

In terms of knowledge, only 46% of Europeans say they know what to do in an emergency, while 48% admit they do not. Once again, Northern and Central European countries (Slovenia, Sweden, Finland, Austria, and the Netherlands) rank highest in awareness, while Mediterranean nations (Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Malta) score the lowest.

A Growing Demand for Information

The survey highlights a growing demand for better access to disaster preparedness information. 65% of Europeans say they need more guidance, with this figure reaching 84% in Greece. Nearly half (49%) would turn to national media to learn about disaster risks.

Experts stress that clearer communication, public education, and community engagement are essential.

“They need better access to good, hard information on what the risks are and how to respond,” said Professor Alexander, calling for higher standards in emergency planning.

With climate change driving more frequent and severe weather events, the urgency for better disaster preparedness has never been greater. Italy, Greece, and Spain are among the European countries facing the most severe human and economic impacts from extreme weather—yet their citizens feel among the least prepared.

As policymakers assess these findings, one message is clear: improving public awareness and emergency response planning must become a top priority in the face of escalating climate risks.

See also  Pope Francis Concludes Synod Without Defining Role of Women in the Church

News

EU Must End ‘Naivety’ on Trade and Confront China’s Industrial Strategy, Says French Minister

Published

on

France’s Minister for Foreign Trade, Nicolas Forissier, has called on the European Union to abandon what he described as “naivety” in its approach to global trade, urging a tougher stance on countries accused of distorting markets through industrial policy and trade practices.

Speaking in an interview with Euronews’ 12 Minutes With programme, Forissier said Europe must respond more firmly to what he described as the weaponisation of trade dependencies, warning that China in particular could damage its own long-term interests by undermining European industry.

“The Chinese have to understand that they won’t win anything if they destroy the European industry and then the European market, which is an essential market for them,” he said. “We must no longer be naive.”

His comments come as the European Commission prepares to hold an “orientation debate” next week on how to respond to a surge of low-cost Chinese imports. The discussion is expected to shape possible new trade defence measures, with further talks likely when EU leaders meet in Brussels in mid-June.

Forissier said the shift in thinking was not limited to China alone but applied to any country using commercial leverage to gain strategic advantage. “It is not only China,” he said. “It is all the countries that weaponise trade.”

Among the proposals under consideration is a requirement for EU companies to diversify supply chains, sourcing components from at least three different suppliers in order to reduce dependency on any single foreign market. Asked whether he supported such a measure, Forissier replied: “Yes, we have to.”

See also  DiXi Group Pioneering Insights in Energy Policy and Security

Other options include targeted tariffs on sensitive industries such as chemicals, alongside stronger use of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tools to counter imports priced below domestic market levels. These measures are designed to address concerns over overcapacity in China’s industrial sector and its impact on European manufacturers.

The debate is taking place against a backdrop of widening trade imbalances. EU goods imports from China exceeded exports by €359.3 billion in 2025, marking an increase of nearly 20% compared with the previous year.

China has already warned it could retaliate if the bloc imposes new restrictions, raising concerns about potential escalation in trade tensions between two of the world’s largest economies.

France has repeatedly pushed for a more assertive European trade policy, arguing that state subsidies, export controls on raw materials and industrial overproduction in major economies are distorting global markets.

Forissier stressed that Europe must maintain open dialogue with Beijing while defending its own industrial base. “We try to respect the Chinese,” he said. “The Chinese have to respect us, and this is the message European institutions have to send.”

Continue Reading

News

US Says Iran Talks ‘Borderline’ as Pakistan Pushes Diplomacy Amid War Tensions

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has said ongoing negotiations over the conflict involving Iran are teetering on the “borderline” between reaching a diplomatic agreement and a return to renewed military strikes, as tensions continue to rise across the region.

The remarks came as Pakistan’s army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran for fresh talks aimed at de-escalating the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. His visit follows a series of high-level diplomatic engagements involving Pakistani officials and Iranian leadership in recent days.

Munir was received in Tehran by Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, alongside Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who has also travelled to the Iranian capital multiple times this week for meetings with senior officials.

Despite the renewed diplomatic activity, Iran has downplayed expectations of a breakthrough. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the visit did not signal any decisive shift in negotiations, describing the differences between the parties as “deep and extensive,” according to Iran’s ISNA news agency.

Speaking at a NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there had been limited progress in the discussions but cautioned against optimism.

“There’s a little bit of movement and that’s good,” Rubio said, adding that he did not want to exaggerate developments. He also warned that Washington retains “other options” if diplomacy fails, echoing Trump’s earlier comments that military action remains on the table if Iran does not agree to terms.

Trump has previously stated that he paused consideration of a strike due to what he described as “serious negotiations” taking place, but has repeatedly warned that the fragile ceasefire reached in mid-April could collapse.

See also  Kamala Harris Gains Momentum as Democratic Nominee After Biden Withdraws

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran remained committed to talks despite what he called repeated breaches of diplomacy by Washington. He said Iran was participating “with a responsible approach and with all seriousness” in an effort to secure what he described as a fair outcome, according to Iranian state media.

A key point of contention remains the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime route through which a significant share of global oil and gas supplies pass. Iranian actions in the waterway and US responses have heightened fears of wider economic disruption.

Iran has effectively restricted access through the strait, while US Central Command has reportedly blocked Iranian ports and redirected commercial vessels since mid-April. The European Union has since expanded its sanctions framework targeting those involved, calling the blockade contrary to international law.

Rubio said allied nations were also discussing contingency plans in case negotiations fail, warning that the situation may require a “plan B” if diplomatic efforts collapse.

Continue Reading

News

US Green Card Rule Change Forces Most Applicants to Apply From Abroad

Published

on

A sweeping policy change in the United States has upended a long-standing immigration process, requiring most foreign nationals seeking green cards to leave the country and complete their applications from abroad.

Under the new directive issued Friday by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), individuals in the United States on temporary visas — including work, student and tourist permits — will generally no longer be able to adjust their status to permanent residency while remaining in the country. Instead, they must return to their home countries and apply through US consulates, except in limited “extraordinary circumstances.”

USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said the policy was intended to realign the immigration system with its original framework.

“From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances,” Kahler said. He added that the change would reduce incentives for people to remain in the US after visa denials.

The decision marks a significant departure from decades of practice, under which many migrants have been allowed to apply for permanent residency from within the United States. That pathway has been commonly used by spouses of US citizens, workers, students, and individuals with family ties in the country.

The process of obtaining a green card often takes months or even years, raising concerns that applicants may now be forced to leave jobs, homes and families while waiting for approval abroad.

Immigration attorneys and advocacy groups said they were still assessing the scope of the policy and how it would be enforced. Many also warned that practical barriers could make compliance difficult, particularly for applicants from countries where travel is restricted or where US consular services are limited or unavailable.

See also  New Tool Reveals Hidden Environmental Cost of Internet Use

Shev Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association said the move appeared to disrupt established procedures. “USCIS is trying to upend decades of processing of adjustment of status,” she said, noting widespread uncertainty over who would be affected.

Jessie De Haven of the California Immigration Project said the policy could discourage eligible applicants from proceeding altogether. “It’s really hard to tell how this is going to be applied,” she said. “I do think it might have a chilling effect on people applying.”

The announcement forms part of a broader immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, which has sought to tighten legal pathways while increasing enforcement measures against irregular migration.

Officials have framed the change as an effort to close loopholes and strengthen oversight of the immigration system. Critics, however, argue it could lead to prolonged separations for families and create new obstacles for lawful immigrants seeking permanent residency in the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending