Connect with us

Travel

UK Watchdog Slams Budget Airlines Over Cabin Bag Pricing

Published

on

UK consumer group Which? has criticised major European budget airlines for rarely offering carry-on bag fares as low as advertised. The watchdog’s survey shows that the lowest prices promoted by Ryanair, EasyJet, and Wizz Air are almost never available to passengers.

The survey examined nearly 1,500 bag prices across eight popular routes, spanning Ryanair, EasyJet, and Wizz Air. It found that advertised cabin bag fares starting from £5.99 (€6.80) were available less than one per cent of the time. Data was collected across four dates in August, November, December, and February to account for peak and off-peak travel.

Which? highlighted that passengers often only discover cabin bag charges at the final stage of booking, a practice the watchdog described as frustrating and potentially misleading. In some cases, the fees for carry-on luggage exceeded the cost of the flight itself, particularly on short European routes, which are the main draw for budget travellers.

The watchdog contrasted these practices with those of larger airlines such as British Airways, KLM, and Qatar Airways, which typically include a free cabin bag while charging for checked luggage. Budget carriers’ additional gate fines and opaque pricing have drawn scrutiny in recent years. In November 2024, Spain’s Consumer Rights Ministry fined five budget airlines €179 million over “abusive practices” regarding luggage, though the EU Commission has challenged Spain’s authority to impose the penalties.

Which? has shared its findings on EasyJet with the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which is now investigating. Rory Boland, editor at Which?, said: “Our research shows that the tens of millions of passengers who need to take a cabin bag will pay much more than the cheapest price advertised. Rather than a few pounds, prices for bags can often exceed the flight itself. The tactics used by these airlines deserve to be called out.”

See also  Gulf Airlines Gradually Resume Flights as Regional Airspace Partially Reopens

EasyJet’s lowest advertised cabin bag fare of £5.99 was not found on any of the 520 flights surveyed. The cheapest fare identified was £23.49 (€26.79), with the average at £30 (€34.20). EasyJet said its pricing is transparent and allows customers to pay only for what they need.

Ryanair’s lowest cabin bag fare of £12 (€13.70) was available on just two out of 634 flights, or 0.3 per cent of the time. The airline dismissed the survey as unrepresentative, noting it operates more than 100,000 flights each month and claimed its policies are optional and transparent.

Wizz Air’s lowest cabin bag fare of €10 was available on only two of 338 flights, or 0.6 per cent of the time. A spokesperson said customers receive a free under-seat bag with every ticket and can choose larger luggage if required, insisting their pricing is compliant and clear across multiple channels.

The Which? survey adds to growing concerns over budget airlines’ baggage fees, with regulators and consumer groups calling for more transparency and fairness in cabin bag pricing.

Travel

Wizz Air Named Europe’s Cheapest Airline as British Airways Tops Cost Ranking

Published

on

Wizz Air has been ranked the least expensive airline in Europe, while British Airways was identified as the costliest major national carrier, according to research comparing passenger revenue generated across 23 European airlines.

The analysis by flight and baggage compensation company AirAdvisor used revenue per available seat kilometre, or RASK, to compare how much airlines earn from passengers for each kilometre flown per available seat.

RASK provides an indication of how much travellers pay relative to distance and available capacity. The measure also reflects additional passenger charges, including fees for baggage and seat selection, rather than relying only on advertised ticket prices.

AirAdvisor said smaller airlines often have higher costs because they operate fewer routes, smaller fleets and services to remote or lower-demand destinations. With fewer seats available and less competition on some routes, fares can be higher.

However, the company said the pattern does not apply universally and travellers should compare prices for individual routes before booking.

The research also found that airline costs generally fell between 2024 and 2025. Among the 14 carriers for which AirAdvisor had year-on-year RASK figures, only five recorded increases, while nine saw their RASK decline.

Norway’s Widerøe topped the overall cost ranking with a RASK of €0.32. The regional airline operates many routes connecting smaller Norwegian airports with larger centres and also serves destinations including Aberdeen, Hamburg and London Southend.

Among major airlines, British Airways ranked as Europe’s most expensive national carrier, with a 2025 RASK of €0.0888. Its figure increased by €0.0038 from the previous year.

See also  Gulf Airlines Gradually Resume Flights as Regional Airspace Partially Reopens

Air France and Austrian Airlines shared the next position among the most expensive major carriers, both recording a RASK of €0.0850.

At the other end of the ranking, Hungary-based Wizz Air had the lowest RASK at €0.0433, making it the least expensive airline in AirAdvisor’s comparison.

The company estimated that choosing Wizz Air instead of Air France could save travellers up to €50 on an average European flight distance, although actual savings depend on the route and additional fees.

easyJet ranked second among the least expensive airlines, with its RASK falling from €0.0770 in 2024 to €0.0521 in 2025.

Ryanair took third place, with RASK declining from €0.0843 to €0.0556 over the same period.

Among the 11 major national airlines included in the study, Finnair was ranked the least expensive.

The findings suggest that airline pricing can vary significantly even among national carriers, while the cost differences between airlines become more noticeable when viewed across typical travel distances.

AirAdvisor advised passengers to use such comparisons as a guide rather than a guarantee of the final fare, as route-specific pricing, luggage charges, seat fees and other extras can significantly affect the total cost of a journey.

Continue Reading

Travel

Mont Blanc Hiking Route Faces Calls for Visitor Limits as Crowds Grow

Published

on

One of Europe’s most popular long-distance hiking routes is facing new pressure to restrict visitor numbers as growing crowds create problems for local communities, mountain guides and the environment.

The Tour du Mont-Blanc is a 170-kilometre circuit passing through France, Italy and Switzerland. Around 80,000 people complete the route each year, with some sections becoming increasingly crowded during the peak hiking season.

On busy parts of the trail, groups can find themselves walking almost continuously behind one another, leaving little space between hikers. Local residents have also raised concerns about visitors failing to respect the natural environment.

Jean-Marc Peillex, mayor of Saint-Gervais-les-Bains in the French Alps, said the situation had become difficult to manage.

“Today we’re moving along in single file. People can only see the backsides of those in front of them. That’s hardly ideal,” he told Swiss public broadcaster SRF.

Peillex wants access to the French section of the route restricted from next spring, with checks and penalties used to enforce the system.

Under the proposed arrangements, hikers planning to complete the Tour du Mont-Blanc would need to reserve accommodation in a mountain hut or an authorised bivouac area. These designated outdoor camping zones generally offer limited facilities compared with huts.

Peillex said hikers unable to secure a place should consider delaying their trip until the following year.

Although only a small section of the route passes through Saint-Gervais-les-Bains, other French municipalities along the trail are working together on the proposed regulations. Their goal is to introduce the new system next spring.

See also  London Named World’s Best City for Culture in Time Out Ranking

Switzerland has not announced similar restrictions, although officials there also acknowledge growing pressure from tourism.

Joachim Rausis, mayor of Orsières in Switzerland’s Valais canton, said there were warning signs and that better coordination was needed between France, Italy and Switzerland.

The rising number of visitors is also creating difficulties for mountain guides. Hotels and mountain huts often need to be booked a year ahead, making planning difficult for self-employed guides whose clients may not arrange trips so far in advance.

The debate reflects a wider challenge facing Alpine tourism: finding a balance between protecting fragile mountain environments, supporting local communities and maintaining public access to the mountains.

Reservation systems are already used on some routes leading toward the Mont Blanc summit. Overnight stays at the Nid d’Aigle, Tête Rousse and Goûter huts require advance bookings, with hikers’ names recorded and booking confirmations subject to checks.

The Goûter and Tête Rousse huts had been operating during the 2026 season but were temporarily closed on August 11 because of rockfall risks.

Officials now face the task of deciding whether similar controls should be extended to the wider Tour du Mont-Blanc as visitor numbers continue to rise.

Continue Reading

Travel

Spain Introduces Border Checks on Travellers Arriving From Italy

Published

on

Spain has introduced temporary border checks on travellers arriving from Italy, escalating a dispute between Madrid and Rome over controls imposed during the recent Ceuta migrant crisis.

The measures came into effect from Saturday, August 8, after Italy refused to comply with a Spanish demand to remove its own border checks on travellers arriving from Spain. Madrid said its controls would remain in place until September 7, while Rome confirmed on Friday that its suspension of normal Schengen arrangements would continue at least until August 15.

The dispute comes during the peak summer travel season, when thousands of people are expected to travel between the two countries. Spanish officials have criticised the Italian measures, saying Spanish citizens have already faced additional checks when entering Italy.

Under Spain’s new arrangements, travellers arriving from Italy by air, sea or land may be required to present identification documents. EU citizens must show a valid identity document, while travellers from outside the bloc may also need to provide a visa or residence permit.

Italian nationals can use either a passport or a national identity card valid for international travel. However, Spain’s requirements come shortly after Italy stopped recognising paper identity cards as travel documents from August 3. Travellers using Italian identity cards must therefore have the electronic CIE version.

The additional checks could cause delays at major airports, ports and land crossings, particularly during one of the busiest periods of the European holiday season.

At airports, Spanish authorities may conduct checks at arrival gates or during boarding. Travellers arriving by ferry or other maritime services could be checked either before departure or after reaching Spain.

See also  Rising Jet Fuel Costs Revive Interest in Travelling to Spain Without Flying

People travelling by road from Italy will generally pass through France before reaching Spain. They may therefore be stopped at the French-Spanish border and asked to present their identification documents.

Families travelling with children have also been advised to ensure that every minor carries the necessary travel documents. Italian regulations provide identity documents with different validity periods depending on a child’s age. Documents are valid for three years for children under three and five years for those aged between three and 18.

Children under 14 are not permitted to travel alone, adding another consideration for families planning journeys between the two countries.

Travellers bringing pets into Spain must also meet EU requirements. Animals need an EU pet passport issued by a veterinarian, along with a microchip and valid vaccination against rabies.

The dispute has created additional uncertainty for travellers who arranged their summer journeys before the measures were announced. Madrid and Rome now face pressure to resolve the disagreement while avoiding further disruption to movement between two EU member states normally connected by the Schengen free-travel area.

Continue Reading

Trending