Tech
Study Links High Screen Time in Early Childhood to Lower Reading and Maths Scores
Children who spend more time on screens in their early years may perform worse in reading and mathematics during primary school, according to a new long-term study from Canada.
Published in the journal JAMA Network Open, the research tracked more than 3,000 children in Ontario from 2008 to 2023, examining how screen habits between infancy and middle childhood affected later academic outcomes. Researchers linked parent-reported data on screen use — including television, video games, and digital devices such as tablets and smartphones — to results from standardized tests taken in grades three and six, roughly at ages eight and eleven.
The findings showed that children with higher levels of total screen time tended to achieve lower scores in both reading and maths. The negative associations were strongest for time spent watching TV and using digital devices, while the study found no clear link between screen use and writing performance.
Only one in five parents reported that their children played video games, but among those who did, the effects appeared to differ by gender. Girls who played video games performed worse in grade three reading and maths than boys with similar habits.
Dr. Catherine Birken, senior child health scientist at Toronto’s SickKids Research Institute and one of the study’s authors, said the results highlight the need for early intervention. “These findings underscore the importance of developing healthy screen habits for young children and their families,” she said.
While the study adds to growing concern over excessive screen use, the authors cautioned that the results show a correlation, not causation. Because the data relied on parental reporting, it may also contain bias.
Experts outside the study urged restraint in interpreting the findings. Chris Ferguson, a psychology professor at Stetson University, said that while such studies are valuable, “the real-world implications are much less certain.” He noted that moderate screen use, particularly when educational or supervised, may not be harmful.
The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that children aged two to four should have no more than one hour of screen time daily, and that babies under one year old should not be exposed to screens at all.
However, other research suggests that not all screen time is detrimental. A 2025 European Union working group report found that moderate and interactive screen use, especially when parents are involved, can support language development in young children.
Despite differing opinions, the new Canadian study reinforces ongoing calls for balance — encouraging families to manage children’s screen exposure while promoting offline activities that foster early learning.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
