Tech
New York City Sues Tech Giants Over Alleged Role in Youth Mental Health Crisis
New York City has filed a sweeping lawsuit against major social media companies, accusing them of fueling a youth mental health crisis by intentionally designing addictive features that target children and teenagers.
The 327-page complaint, filed in Manhattan federal court, names the parent companies of Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Google, and YouTube. It alleges that the firms knowingly created platforms engineered to capture and hold users’ attention, despite being aware of the negative psychological effects on younger audiences.
According to the city, social media giants built their platforms around “algorithmically-driven endless feeds” and “incessant notifications,” which encourage compulsive use and prevent users from disconnecting. These design features, the lawsuit claims, have contributed to rising rates of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and low self-esteem among young people.
“Instead of feeding coins into slot machines, kids are feeding social media platforms with an endless supply of attention, time, and data,” the lawsuit stated. It argues that companies prioritized profits over public health, deliberately exploiting the vulnerabilities of children and teenagers to maximize engagement and advertising revenue.
The city also accuses the companies of ignoring mounting evidence linking heavy social media use to mental health harms. “The defendants have long been aware of research connecting use of their apps with harm to their users’ well-being but chose to ignore or brush it off,” the filing said.
The lawsuit seeks damages and claims the companies acted with gross negligence and created a public nuisance. It adds to a growing number of legal challenges brought by U.S. state governments, school districts, and advocacy groups over the impact of social media on young users.
Google spokesperson José Castañeda rejected the allegations, telling Euronews Next that the case “fundamentally misunderstands how YouTube works.” He described YouTube as “a platform for watching videos, not a social network where people go to catch up with friends.” Other companies named in the lawsuit, including Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The case comes amid intensifying global scrutiny of social media’s effects on young people. Policymakers in several countries have called for tighter regulation, with Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen recently proposing a ban on social media use for children under 15.
New York City officials say the lawsuit is intended to hold tech companies accountable for what they describe as a “systemic assault on the mental health of a generation.” They argue that while social media has become deeply embedded in modern life, its design should not come at the expense of children’s well-being.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
