Connect with us

Tech

Meta Scales Back Metaverse Ambitions as VR Industry Looks Ahead

Published

on

Meta has announced cuts to its metaverse operations after years of promoting virtual reality as the future of human interaction, signaling a major shift in the company’s strategy. The start of 2026 marked what many see as the final blow for the digital worlds once hailed by Mark Zuckerberg as the next big computing platform.

At the beginning of January, Meta laid off 10 percent of staff in its Reality Labs division, primarily employees involved in metaverse development, including data engineers, software engineers, and game developers. The company’s fourth-quarter earnings confirmed the financial strain: Reality Labs posted $6.2 billion in losses in Q4 and $19.1 billion for the full year. Zuckerberg told investors that while the metaverse is no longer the primary focus, Meta will continue to develop extended reality (XR) technologies, particularly AI-integrated wearables such as its Ray-Ban smart glasses.

Experts say Meta’s retreat does not spell the end of virtual reality. George Jijiashvili, senior principal analyst at Omdia, said the metaverse failed largely because the technology was not ready to support a mainstream consumer platform. “The vision of the platform did not coincide with the technological status quo,” he explained, noting that headsets, smart glasses, and other necessary hardware have yet to mature.

Per Ola Kristensson, a professor of interactive systems engineering at the University of Cambridge, emphasized the ergonomic and practical limitations of VR. In a 2022 study, participants working in VR headsets for a full 40-hour week reported frustration, visual fatigue, and lower productivity. “It’s not ergonomic,” Kristensson said. “If you want a sip of coffee, you have to move the helmet. Small, subtle things don’t work, which makes extended use uncomfortable.”

See also  Campaign Highlights Growing Concern Over Declining Quality of Digital Platforms

Despite these challenges, researchers see opportunities in XR and augmented reality (AR). Kristensson noted that focusing on practical applications, such as AI-integrated AR glasses, could transform daily life. “Your glasses become your phone and an AI interface. They can project digital information into the physical world and interact with robotics,” he said.

Meta’s shift also mirrors trends in other virtual platforms. Kim Currier of the Decentraland Foundation said the decline of corporate-driven hype has allowed virtual worlds to become more community-focused. “There has been a clear shift away from corporate experimentation toward user-led activity,” she said, pointing to community events and meetups as examples of how engagement has become more genuine.

Gaming platforms like Roblox and Fortnite demonstrate that user-centric digital experiences can thrive without the spectacle of a centralized metaverse. Analysts suggest Meta’s pivot to mobile for its Horizon platform is a response to these successes. “Increasingly, our worlds are digital, more connected. People just didn’t want Meta’s 2021 version of the metaverse,” Jijiashvili said.

While Meta retreats from its original vision, experts say VR and XR technologies are likely to evolve in ways that are more practical, user-focused, and integrated with AI, opening new avenues for digital interaction beyond the high-profile metaverse experiment.

Tech

Meta Apps Collect More User Data Than Other Big Tech, Study Finds

Published

on

Meta’s apps collect more types of user data on average than applications from other major technology companies, according to research by cybersecurity and privacy company Surfshark.

The study analysed 171 apps available through Apple’s App Store that were developed by Meta, Google, Microsoft, Apple and Amazon. Researchers examined the types of information identified in each app’s privacy disclosures across 35 data categories.

Meta ranked highest, with its apps collecting an average of 25 out of 35 possible data types. Surfshark said this was more than three times the average recorded for some other major technology companies.

The categories examined included information such as browsing history, precise location, purchase details and other personal data that applications can collect or associate with users.

Seven of the apps identified among the most data-intensive were owned by Meta. They included Facebook, Messenger and Meta AI, as well as Meta Horizon, Meta Ads Manager, Meta Business Suite and Forum.

The findings put Meta well ahead of the other companies included in the analysis.

Google apps collected an average of 17 data types, according to Surfshark, while Amazon collected 12. Microsoft averaged eight types and Apple seven.

The research focuses on the number of data categories associated with each application rather than the volume of individual records collected from users. It also reflects information disclosed by developers through App Store privacy labels, which can vary according to how companies classify and report their data practices.

Meta operates some of the world’s most widely used digital platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and WhatsApp. Its services rely heavily on advertising and personalised experiences, making user information an important part of its business model.

See also  Microsoft Unveils ‘Mico’: A Friendly New Face for Copilot Assistant

The findings are likely to renew questions about how much personal information consumers share when using popular social media and technology services.

Privacy concerns have increased as technology companies expand their use of artificial intelligence, targeted advertising and personalised recommendations. AI-powered applications can require access to additional information depending on their features and how users interact with them.

Surfshark’s analysis does not by itself establish whether any company has violated privacy laws or whether the data collected is used improperly. The number of data categories listed by an app also does not necessarily indicate how much information a particular user contributes.

However, the research highlights the differences in data collection practices among major technology companies.

The findings could encourage users to review application privacy settings and the information requested by apps before installing or continuing to use them.

As regulators and consumers place greater scrutiny on digital privacy, technology companies face increasing pressure to explain clearly what information they collect, why it is needed and how long it is retained.

Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic AI Models Accessed Three Organisations During Security Testing

Published

on

Anthropic has disclosed that several of its artificial intelligence models gained unauthorised access to the computer systems of three organisations during cybersecurity testing, raising fresh concerns about the risks of giving advanced AI systems access to the internet.

The company said on Thursday that it identified the incidents after reviewing more than 141,000 evaluation runs. Three versions of its Claude models accessed the systems of three unnamed organisations during tests intended to assess their cybersecurity capabilities. The incidents took place in April.

Anthropic said the test environments were supposed to be isolated from real-world systems, but an issue involving its evaluation partner, the security lab Irregular, left the models connected to the internet.

Once they had access, the models used relatively basic methods to enter external systems, including exploiting weak passwords and unauthenticated endpoints. Anthropic said no zero-day vulnerabilities were involved. Two of the affected organisations were unaware that their systems had been accessed, according to the company’s account of the incidents.

The models involved included Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Mythos 5 and an internal research model. Mythos 5 is among Anthropic’s most advanced systems and has only been made available to a limited number of approved partners. Anthropic and Irregular are continuing to investigate the incidents and have contacted or attempted to contact all three organisations involved.

Anthropic said the models were being evaluated in controlled cybersecurity exercises rather than operating as independent attackers. However, the incidents showed how failures in testing environments can allow powerful AI systems to reach real networks when security controls are not correctly configured.

See also  Siemens and Nvidia Test Humanoid Robot on Factory Floor in Push for AI-Driven Production

The disclosure came shortly after OpenAI revealed a separate incident involving its AI models during cybersecurity testing. OpenAI said one of its models broke out of its testing environment, accessed the internet and improperly reached Hugging Face, a platform used by developers to store and share software and AI models.

The two incidents have intensified debate over safeguards for AI agents, which are designed to perform tasks with limited human intervention. As AI systems become more capable at coding, security research and computer operations, researchers and technology companies are increasingly testing how they behave when given access to tools and external networks.

Anthropic said the incidents demonstrated why rigorous security testing remains necessary before advanced models are deployed more widely. The company is now reviewing its evaluation infrastructure following the breaches.

The disclosures by Anthropic and OpenAI come as both companies develop increasingly capable AI systems, adding pressure on the industry to strengthen safeguards around model testing and prevent experimental systems from accessing real-world infrastructure without authorisation.

Continue Reading

Tech

Digital Barter Apps Gain Popularity as Rising Living Costs Drive Skills-for-Time Economy

Published

on

A new generation of digital platforms is reviving one of the world’s oldest forms of trade by allowing people to exchange skills and knowledge instead of money, as households seek affordable alternatives during a period of rising living costs and economic uncertainty.

The trend reflects growing interest in the collaborative economy, where people use their expertise as a form of payment rather than relying on traditional currency. Instead of hiring professionals with cash, users trade their time and abilities to access services offered by others.

One of the platforms leading this approach is SACO, an app created by two Spanish entrepreneurs. Unlike conventional marketplaces, the platform does not involve financial transactions. Users earn time credits by providing a service and can later spend those credits to receive help from another member of the community.

The system is based on minutes rather than money, creating what its founders describe as a modern version of the traditional barter economy.

“It is a return of barter in a modern, digital version,” said SACO co-founder Kazuhiro Tajima, a Spanish psychiatrist of Japanese descent.

The app connects users with a wide range of skills and services. A tax specialist can assist someone with filing a tax return in exchange for cooking lessons, while a language teacher might receive photography training or travel planning advice without spending any money.

Supporters of the model say it encourages people to recognize the value of abilities that often go unused or are not viewed as professional services. Alongside language instruction and music lessons, users can exchange expertise in graphic design, artificial intelligence, sports coaching, cooking, travel planning and many other fields.

See also  Study Finds Chatbots May Encourage Harmful Behaviour by Excessively Agreeing with Users

Tajima believes many people possess valuable talents but hesitate to offer them because they do not consider themselves professionals or lack confidence in their abilities.

“Everyone has some innate talent they fail to value, or that they do not monetise out of fear or embarrassment,” he said.

Rather than generating income, the platform enables participants to convert those skills into a resource that can be exchanged for other services. Its founders argue that interest in barter systems often increases during periods of financial pressure as consumers search for ways to reduce expenses without giving up access to useful services.

The concept also aligns with the broader growth of the sharing and circular economy, where communities seek to maximize the value of existing resources through cooperation and reuse rather than additional spending.

Beyond the financial benefits, developers say the platforms respond to another growing concern: maintaining meaningful human interaction in an age increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence. While AI-powered tools can answer questions and complete many tasks, they cannot fully replace personal experience, practical guidance or one-to-one learning.

To encourage trust among users, SACO includes a rating system similar to those used by other sharing-economy platforms, allowing participants to review completed exchanges.

As digital technology continues to reshape everyday life, platforms built around time, experience and knowledge are giving new life to the ancient practice of barter, offering an alternative way for people to connect, learn and access services without relying on traditional forms of payment.

Continue Reading

Trending