News
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration from Deploying National Guard in Portland
A federal judge in Oregon has temporarily barred the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard to Portland, ruling that the move was unjustified given the scale of recent protests and could infringe on the state’s sovereignty.
US District Judge Karin Immergut issued the temporary injunction on Saturday in response to a lawsuit filed by the state of Oregon and the city of Portland. The legal challenge came just days after the Trump administration announced plans to federalise 200 members of the Oregon National Guard to protect federal buildings, claiming the city was “war-ravaged.”
In her ruling, Judge Immergut said the protests in Portland had been relatively small and did not warrant military intervention. “This country has a longstanding and foundational tradition of resistance to government overreach, especially in the form of military intrusion into civil affairs,” she wrote. “This historical tradition boils down to a simple proposition: this is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.”
The court found that the president’s determination to deploy federalised forces was “untethered to the facts,” noting that demonstrations near the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building were largely peaceful and limited in scope. Immergut warned that allowing such a deployment could undermine Oregon’s state sovereignty and blur the constitutional boundaries between federal and local authority.
While the president is generally afforded broad discretion to federalise National Guard troops when local law enforcement cannot maintain order, Immergut said this was not the case in Portland.
Following the ruling, the White House immediately filed a notice of appeal to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. “President Trump exercised his lawful authority to protect federal assets and personnel in Portland following violent riots and attacks on law enforcement — we expect to be vindicated by a higher court,” said White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson.
The ruling comes amid a broader legal battle over the federal government’s use of military and law enforcement powers in American cities. Last month, another federal judge ruled that Trump’s deployment of more than 4,700 National Guard soldiers and Marines to Los Angeles was unlawful, though about 300 troops were allowed to remain on the condition that they did not engage in civilian law enforcement.
Meanwhile, President Trump on Saturday approved the deployment of 300 National Guard members to Chicago after federal immigration officials reported clashes with demonstrators.
In Portland, protests had remained small—typically drawing a few dozen people—until the announcement of the planned National Guard deployment on September 28, which saw crowds swell to around 400. Federal agents responded with tear gas and pepper rounds as tensions flared near the ICE facility, resulting in several arrests.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
