Health
Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Faster Cognitive Decline, Study Finds
Artificial sweeteners found in diet sodas and low-calorie desserts may be linked to faster cognitive decline, according to new research published in the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.
The study, which tracked nearly 13,000 adults in Brazil over an average of eight years, found that people who consumed the highest amounts of artificial sweeteners experienced cognitive decline 62 per cent faster than those with the lowest intake. The decline was equivalent to around 1.6 years of ageing in terms of memory, language, and thinking skills.
“Low- and no-calorie sweeteners are often seen as a healthy alternative to sugar,” said lead author Claudia Kimie Suemoto, associate professor of geriatrics at the University of São Paulo. “However, our findings suggest certain sweeteners may have negative effects on brain health over time.”
The Study
Participants, who had an average age of 52 at the start, underwent repeated tests assessing cognitive function. They were divided into three groups based on sweetener consumption. The lowest-intake group consumed about 20 mg per day, while the highest group averaged 191 mg daily — roughly the amount of aspartame in a single can of diet soda.
Researchers examined several common sweeteners, including aspartame, saccharin, acesulfame-K, erythritol, xylitol, and sorbitol. All were linked to accelerated cognitive decline except for tagatose, which showed no significant effect.
The association was more pronounced among participants with diabetes, who often rely on sugar substitutes. However, no link was observed in participants over 60 years old, suggesting that mid-life consumption may have a greater impact on long-term brain health.
Broader Concerns
The findings add to a growing body of evidence questioning the long-term safety of artificial sweeteners. Previous research has connected non-sugar sweeteners to higher risks of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer has already classified aspartame as a possible carcinogen, though regulators have maintained that approved sweeteners remain safe within established limits.
Still, Suemoto stressed that the current study highlights associations rather than direct cause-and-effect. “More research is needed to determine exactly how artificial sweeteners may impact the brain,” she noted.
Regulation and Next Steps
In the European Union, all sugar alternatives must undergo safety evaluations before being sold, and their presence must be indicated on food and drink labels. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is currently re-assessing the safety of sweeteners approved before 2009.
The study does have limitations, including reliance on participants’ self-reported diets and a focus on selected sweeteners. Nonetheless, experts say it underscores the need for closer scrutiny of products marketed as healthier sugar substitutes.
As consumers increasingly turn to low-calorie sweeteners in pursuit of healthier lifestyles, researchers warn that the long-term effects on brain health may not be as benign as once believed.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Home Improvement1 year agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
