Business
Families Sue Boeing and Honeywell Over Deadly Air India Crash
The families of four victims of the Air India jet crash in June have filed a lawsuit in the United States against aircraft manufacturer Boeing and aerospace supplier Honeywell, alleging that faulty fuel switches caused the disaster that killed more than 260 people.
The lawsuit, filed in a U.S. court, accuses both companies of negligence and failing to act on known risks associated with the switches. According to the complaint, the defect led to a catastrophic loss of fuel to the engines just moments after the plane departed from Ahmedabad International Airport. A total of 242 people on board were killed, along with 19 people on the ground. Only one passenger survived.
A preliminary investigation report released in July by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) confirmed that fuel to the aircraft’s engines had been cut shortly after takeoff. The report rejected speculation that bird strikes could have caused the accident, noting there was “no significant bird activity” detected in the area at the time.
The AAIB also found that Air India had not carried out recommended inspections of the fuel switches before the flight. The issue was flagged years earlier by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which in 2018 issued a bulletin warning that some Boeing fuel control switches had been installed without an active locking feature. The mechanism, designed to hold the switches securely in place, was crucial for uninterrupted fuel flow. The FAA urged airlines to inspect the parts, though the guidance was not legally binding.
Lawyers representing the families argue that Boeing and Honeywell were aware of the defect but failed to take sufficient action. “It is shocking that Honeywell and Boeing both knew of this danger and did absolutely nothing to prevent the inevitable catastrophe that occurred on June 12,” said Benjamin Major of the Lanier Law Firm, co-counsel for the families. He likened the flaw to placing an unprotected emergency brake next to a car’s radio knob, stressing that restarting jet engines takes far longer than restarting a vehicle.
The lawsuit also claims that the fuel switches were located in a vulnerable position, making them prone to accidental activation. A cockpit audio recording reportedly captured the pilots’ shock as the engines failed. Both denied deliberately shutting off the fuel supply and attempted to restart the engines, but the effort came too late to save the aircraft.
Boeing, when contacted, referred to the AAIB’s preliminary findings but declined further comment. Honeywell did not immediately respond to requests for a statement. A more detailed report on the accident is expected to be published by Indian authorities next year.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement1 year agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
