Connect with us

Business

Democrats Warn New Trump Tariffs Could Raise Costs for US Households

Published

on

Congressional Democrats are warning that a new round of tariffs introduced by US President Donald Trump could significantly increase costs for American households, as the administration seeks to replace federal revenue lost after a recent court ruling against earlier trade measures.

A study released Friday by Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee estimates that import taxes imposed by the administration could cost US households an average of $2,512 in 2026. That figure represents a 44 per cent increase compared with last year’s estimated burden of $1,745 per household.

The report comes as many American consumers are already dealing with higher living expenses and rising fuel costs linked to tensions in the Middle East, particularly the ongoing conflict involving Iran.

Maggie Hassan, a Democratic senator from New Hampshire and the top Democrat on the committee, criticised the administration’s trade strategy. She said the government has continued introducing tariffs even after a legal setback earlier this year.

“Despite a Supreme Court ruling that much of the tariff agenda is illegal, the administration refuses to provide relief for families,” Hassan said. She added that additional tariffs could drive prices even higher for households already struggling with increased costs.

The White House dismissed the report. Spokesman Kush Desai described the analysis as inaccurate and defended the president’s trade policy, saying tariffs remain a key tool for renegotiating trade agreements, lowering certain costs and encouraging investment in the United States.

The debate follows a major decision by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 20. The court ruled that the administration did not have the authority to impose wide-ranging tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which had been used to justify tariffs on imports from nearly every country.

See also  U.S. Sues California Over Egg Regulations Amid Price Spike

As a result of the ruling, the government is expected to refund importers who paid the tariffs. The total amount of refunds could reach about $175 billion.

In response, the administration has begun introducing new trade measures using other legal authorities. Officials have already implemented a 10 per cent tariff under the Trade Act of 1974 through Section 122, with the possibility of raising it to 15 per cent. However, tariffs under that provision can only remain in place for 150 days unless Congress approves an extension.

The administration is also turning to Section 301 of the same law, which allows tariffs on countries accused of unfair or discriminatory trade practices.

Earlier this week, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer launched an investigation into whether 16 trading partners, including China and the European Union, are producing excess goods that harm American industries.

Democrats argue that tariffs ultimately fall on consumers. They point to analysis from the Congressional Budget Office indicating that importers often pass tariff costs on to buyers, while domestic producers may also raise prices because of reduced foreign competition.

The renewed push for tariffs comes ahead of November’s midterm elections, as economic concerns remain a central issue for voters facing higher living costs and volatile energy prices.

Business

UniCredit’s €35 Billion Bid for Commerzbank Faces German Rejection as Takeover Battle Intensifies

Published

on

UniCredit’s hostile €35 billion takeover offer for Germany’s Commerzbank is set to close on Tuesday night, bringing to a head a politically charged banking battle that has drawn resistance from Berlin and renewed debate over consolidation in Europe’s financial sector.

The Milan-based lender launched its bid in early May in an effort to take control of Commerzbank and strengthen its position as a pan-European banking powerhouse. The offer, which formally expires at 11:59 p.m. local time unless extended, has already cleared the 30 percent acceptance threshold UniCredit had set as a key milestone.

However, the proposal has been widely criticised as undervaluing the German lender, and has faced firm opposition from both Commerzbank’s leadership and the German government. Berlin has repeatedly voiced concerns over the bid, warning that Commerzbank plays a critical role in financing Germany’s small and medium-sized enterprises as well as supporting employment in Frankfurt’s financial sector.

Germany’s Financial Market Stabilisation Fund rejected the offer outright on Tuesday, stating that it supports Commerzbank’s independence strategy and opposes what it described as UniCredit’s aggressive approach. Chancellor Friedrich Merz had earlier warned that the bid risks undermining trust in one of Germany’s key private banks.

In response, Commerzbank chief executive Bettina Orlopp has introduced a long-term strategy aimed at improving profitability by 2030, including cost-cutting measures and restructuring efforts designed to make the bank more efficient and attractive to investors.

UniCredit, meanwhile, has reported growing support for its bid, stating that acceptance levels stood at 11.9 percent as of Monday, in addition to its existing 26.7 percent stake. The bank has also disclosed exposure through derivatives linked to an additional share of Commerzbank’s capital.

See also  Raising Pension Ages Sparks Controversy Across Europe Amid Economic Challenges

The Italian lender argues that surpassing the 30 percent threshold should allow it greater influence over governance, including the appointment of supervisory board representatives. That position has been firmly rejected by Commerzbank, which points to existing agreements with the German state that protect its role in board nominations.

Tensions between the two institutions have also escalated over allegations of misleading disclosures. Commerzbank has asked Germany’s financial regulator, BaFin, to investigate UniCredit’s reporting practices, while prosecutors in Frankfurt have opened a preliminary inquiry into possible market manipulation linked to trading activity during the offer period.

UniCredit has rejected all accusations, insisting its disclosures comply fully with regulatory requirements and accusing Commerzbank management of misrepresenting the facts to shape public perception.

Beyond pricing and governance disputes, the takeover attempt highlights broader concerns about consolidation in European banking and the future structure of national financial institutions. With the offer deadline approaching, the outcome will determine whether UniCredit can advance its ambition of reshaping its German operations through a deeper integration with Commerzbank or whether resistance from Berlin succeeds in halting the bid.

Continue Reading

Business

SpaceX Strikes $60 Billion Deal to Acquire AI Coding Startup Cursor in Major Expansion into Enterprise AI

Published

on

SpaceX has agreed to acquire Anysphere, the company behind the AI-powered coding tool Cursor, in an all-stock deal valued at $60 billion, marking one of the company’s most significant moves beyond its core aerospace business.

The agreement, announced on Tuesday, signals a deeper push by Elon Musk’s firm into the rapidly expanding enterprise artificial intelligence sector, where companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic have already established strong commercial positions. Anysphere, based in San Francisco, develops software that uses AI to automate large parts of the programming process, and its Cursor tool has become widely adopted among developers.

Under the terms of the deal, a SpaceX subsidiary, X67 Inc., will merge with Anysphere, making Cursor a wholly owned subsidiary of the aerospace company. The transaction is expected to be completed in the third quarter of the year, pending regulatory approval.

The acquisition comes just days after SpaceX completed a high-profile initial public offering that valued the company at record levels. Following the announcement, SpaceX shares continued to climb in premarket trading, rising more than 4 percent and trading significantly above their IPO price.

If the momentum holds, the company’s valuation could challenge some of the largest technology firms globally, reflecting strong investor interest in Musk’s expanding technology portfolio.

SpaceX had previously secured an option in April to either acquire Cursor outright for $60 billion or enter a smaller partnership worth $10 billion focused on providing computing resources. The decision to proceed with a full acquisition highlights the company’s confidence in the long-term value of AI-driven software development tools.

See also  Sony Announces Price Hike for PlayStation 5 in Europe and Australia, Sparing US Market

Founded in 2022, Anysphere has experienced rapid growth. The company reported approximately $2.6 billion in annualised business-to-business revenue earlier this year, driven by strong demand for its AI-assisted coding platform. It has also attracted more than $3 billion in funding from major investors, including Nvidia and OpenAI.

The deal further expands Musk’s presence in artificial intelligence following the earlier merger between SpaceX and his AI venture xAI. Industry observers say the acquisition could strengthen xAI’s position in AI-assisted coding, an area where it has lagged behind competitors, while also giving Anysphere access to significantly greater computing power and infrastructure.

Analysts view the move as part of a broader strategy to integrate AI capabilities across Musk’s technology ecosystem, spanning aerospace, software, and data-driven services. The transaction also underscores intensifying competition in the AI sector, where major technology companies are racing to secure tools that enhance software development and enterprise productivity.

Regulatory approval remains pending, but the acquisition is already being seen as a pivotal step in SpaceX’s evolution from an aerospace leader into a broader artificial intelligence and technology powerhouse.

Continue Reading

Business

Oil Markets Stabilise After Iran Deal, but Experts Warn Energy Supply Recovery Will Take Months

Published

on

Despite the announcement of a deal to end the Iran conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, energy experts caution that global oil and gas markets will not return to normal quickly, with supply disruptions expected to persist for months.

The agreement, reached on Sunday, has eased immediate market fears and triggered a fall in crude prices at the start of the week. Brent crude, the international benchmark, slipped by $3.45 to $83.89 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate fell $4.03 to $80.85 per barrel. Even with the decline, prices remain significantly higher than the pre-war level of around $70 per barrel.

Analysts say the underlying disruption to global supply chains cannot be resolved in the short term. Shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz, which normally carry around one-fifth of the world’s oil and refined fuel supplies, were severely disrupted during the conflict, leaving tankers stranded in the Persian Gulf for more than three months.

Daniel Evans, global head of fuels and refining research at S&P Global Energy, said the recovery process will be gradual and dependent on logistical and financial conditions. He noted that insurance coverage, crew availability and safety assurances will all need to be restored before shipping activity can return to normal levels.

“There needs to be confidence that there is a safe window to bring vessels in, load them and move them out again,” Evans said, adding that restarting operations will require coordination across multiple sectors.

Even once shipments resume, the physical movement of oil remains slow. Tankers can take weeks or even months to reach refineries across global markets, meaning the impact of renewed flows will not be immediate.

See also  Rheinmetall and Anduril Partner to Develop Drones and Rocket Motors for Europe

Complicating the recovery further, several Middle Eastern producers were forced to halt or reduce output during the conflict due to storage constraints, a process known as shut-ins. Restarting those facilities is expected to take time, particularly in countries with more complex extraction conditions.

Alan Gelder, senior vice president at energy analytics firm Wood Mackenzie, said Gulf producers such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates could recover more quickly due to alternative export routes. However, he warned that Iraq and other heavily affected producers may require up to a year to fully restore output.

Investment in new energy infrastructure has also been delayed by the conflict, further slowing long-term recovery. Analysts say companies are unlikely to restart major capital spending until there is confidence that stability in the Strait of Hormuz will last beyond a short-term ceasefire.

As Daniel Sternoff of Columbia University noted, uncertainty remains over how quickly normal shipping conditions can be restored, leaving the global energy market in a cautious transition phase despite diplomatic progress.

Continue Reading

Trending