Connect with us

Business

Report Finds AI Still Far From Reaching Full Potential in the Labour Market

Published

on

A new study by artificial intelligence company Anthropic suggests that while AI tools are capable of performing a wide range of tasks, their actual use in the workplace remains far below their theoretical potential.

The report, titled Labour Market Impacts of AI: A New Measure and Early Evidence, draws on real-world usage data from the company’s AI assistant Claude. Researchers examined how AI is being used in professional settings and compared its real-world adoption with the tasks it could theoretically automate.

The study introduces a concept called “observed exposure,” which measures how frequently AI is already being applied in everyday work. This differs from “theoretical capability,” which reflects the tasks AI systems are technically able to perform.

According to the report, theoretical AI coverage exceeds 80 percent in several occupational groups. Jobs in computer and mathematics as well as business and finance rank highest, both reaching 94.3 percent theoretical coverage. Management roles follow at 91.3 percent, while office and administrative support stands at 90 percent.

Other sectors with strong theoretical exposure include legal occupations at 89 percent, architecture and engineering at 84.8 percent, and arts and media roles at 83.7 percent.

Several additional fields also show considerable potential for AI use. Life and social sciences have theoretical coverage of 77 percent, sales roles stand at 62 percent, education and library jobs reach 61.7 percent, healthcare practitioners record 59.9 percent, and social services show potential coverage of just over 50 percent.

Despite these figures, the report found that actual AI adoption remains significantly lower. Computer and math occupations show the highest observed exposure at 35.8 percent, followed by office and administrative work at 34.3 percent. Business and finance roles stand at 28.4 percent, while sales occupations record 26.9 percent.

See also  Roca Group to Invest €70 Million in Kazakhstan to Establish Central Asian Production Hub

Legal jobs show observed exposure of 20.4 percent, with arts and media at 19.2 percent and education and library roles at 18.2 percent.

The study also examined how much of AI’s potential is currently being used. Sales positions show the highest proportion of real-world adoption compared with theoretical capability at 43 percent. Office and administrative jobs follow at 38 percent, along with computer and math roles at the same level.

By contrast, architecture and engineering occupations show only about five percent of their theoretical potential being used despite having high technical compatibility with AI systems.

The report identifies several individual professions with particularly high exposure to AI tools. Computer programmers lead the list with observed exposure of 74.5 percent. Customer service representatives follow at 70.1 percent, while data entry keyers stand at 67.1 percent and medical records specialists at 66.7 percent.

Market research analysts and marketing specialists show exposure levels of 64.8 percent, and wholesale sales representatives rank at 62.8 percent.

Researchers also found that workers in the most exposed professions tend to be older, more highly educated and better paid. Women are also more likely to work in roles with higher exposure to AI tools.

Despite growing adoption, the study found no clear increase in unemployment among workers in highly exposed occupations since late 2022. However, there are early signs that hiring of younger workers may be slowing in some of these fields, suggesting that the long-term impact of AI on employment remains uncertain.

Business

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady as Middle East Conflict Clouds Economic Outlook

Published

on

The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged on Wednesday, marking the third consecutive meeting without a move as policymakers weigh rising inflation and growing uncertainty linked to the conflict in the Middle East.

The decision leaves the federal funds rate in a target range of 3.50% to 3.75%. While widely expected, the outcome revealed significant divisions within the central bank’s policy-setting committee, underscoring the difficult balancing act facing officials.

In its post-meeting statement, the Fed said recent developments in the Middle East had added to uncertainty surrounding the US economic outlook. It noted that inflation remains above target, partly due to higher global energy prices following renewed tensions in the region.

Despite holding rates steady, the central bank signalled that cuts remain possible later this year if inflation eases and economic conditions weaken. Still, the decision was far from unanimous. Three policymakers opposed language suggesting future rate cuts, while one official, Stephen Miran, argued for an immediate reduction.

The dissent marked the highest level of disagreement within the Federal Open Market Committee since 1992, highlighting a widening debate over how best to respond to slowing growth and persistent price pressures.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who is expected to step down as chair in May, said the central bank must remain cautious as it navigates a complex economic environment. Inflation has risen to 3.3%, well above the Fed’s 2% target, while recent data show the labour market is losing momentum.

Although unemployment remains relatively low at 4.3%, hiring has slowed considerably in recent months. Policymakers are trying to prevent inflation from becoming entrenched while avoiding unnecessary damage to economic growth.

See also  Oil Prices Edge Higher After OPEC+ Announces Modest Production Increase

Powell also indicated that he intends to remain on the Fed’s Board of Governors after his term as chair ends, potentially until early 2028. He cited concerns about maintaining institutional stability amid what he described as mounting political pressure on the central bank.

His decision would temporarily prevent President Donald Trump from appointing another governor immediately, even as Trump’s nominee to succeed Powell as chair, Kevin Warsh, moves closer to confirmation.

Warsh has advocated broad changes to the Fed’s policymaking framework and has expressed support for lower interest rates. However, with inflation still elevated, analysts say any shift toward easier monetary policy may be gradual.

The Fed’s next moves will likely depend on how inflation, employment and energy markets evolve in the coming months. For now, policymakers appear determined to proceed carefully as geopolitical risks and domestic economic challenges continue to shape the outlook.

Continue Reading

Business

Debate Grows in Germany Over Using Gold Reserves to Ease Economic Pressures

Published

on

Germany’s vast gold reserves have become the focus of renewed political and economic debate, as calls grow for part of the stockpile to be used to support households, businesses and public investment.

The German Bundesbank holds 3,350 tonnes of gold, making it the world’s second-largest national reserve after the United States. With gold prices recently rising above $4,700 per troy ounce, the value of Germany’s holdings has climbed to nearly €440 billion.

Marcel Fratzscher, president of the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), has suggested that some of this reserve could be put to practical use. He described the gold stockpile as a valuable resource in times of economic strain and argued that selling a portion could help fund investments in infrastructure and education, while also easing financial pressure on consumers and businesses.

The proposal comes as Germany continues to grapple with rising living costs. Consumer prices remain elevated, with sectors such as transport seeing particularly sharp increases. Official figures show that the Motorists’ Index, which tracks driving-related expenses, was 6.7% higher in March than a year earlier.

Germany’s gold reserves are not all held domestically. About one-third, or 1,236 tonnes, is stored at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, while another 404 tonnes is held in London. The remainder is kept in Frankfurt. All reserves remain under the ownership and management of the Bundesbank.

The overseas storage arrangement dates back to the post-war Bretton Woods era, when Germany’s trade surpluses were converted into gold. Although the Bundesbank repatriated 374 tonnes from Paris in 2017, most of its foreign-held gold remains in New York.

See also  Trump Administration Moves to Block Iberdrola Wind Farms off Massachusetts Coast

That has prompted fresh political scrutiny. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups have questioned whether Germany should continue to keep such a large share of its reserves abroad, particularly in the United States.

The Alternative for Germany party has called for the full repatriation of the country’s gold, while also suggesting it could serve as backing for a future national currency. The proposal has been widely rejected by mainstream parties, which have defended both the security of the reserves and Germany’s commitment to the euro.

Others have focused less on location and more on whether some of the gold should be sold. Supporters of that view argue that the reserves could be used more actively during periods of economic difficulty.

The Bundesbank, however, has consistently opposed any sale. It regards gold as a cornerstone of financial stability and a long-term safeguard for confidence in Germany’s monetary system.

While no immediate policy change appears likely, the discussion reflects growing pressure on policymakers to consider every available option as Europe’s largest economy faces mounting economic challenges.

Continue Reading

Business

European Fuel Prices Remain Elevated After Iran Conflict Despite Ceasefire

Published

on

Fuel prices across Europe remain significantly higher than before the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, even after a ceasefire helped ease some of the market pressure.

Petrol and diesel costs surged in the weeks following the military action launched on 28 February, when the United States and Israel carried out strikes against Iranian targets. Iran responded with retaliatory attacks across the region, stoking fears of supply disruptions in global energy markets. Although Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire on 8 April, fuel prices have yet to return to pre-crisis levels.

Data from the European Commission’s Weekly Oil Bulletin show that the average price of petrol across the European Union rose from €1.64 per litre on 23 February to €1.83 by 20 April, an increase of 12%.

Several countries recorded much steeper rises. Belgium, Czechia and Bulgaria each saw petrol prices jump by 22%. Among Europe’s largest economies, France posted the sharpest increase at 18%, followed by Germany at 15%. Italy experienced a 7% rise, while Spain saw a more modest 3% increase. Petrol prices in Malta remained unchanged.

Diesel prices climbed even faster. Across the EU, the average price of diesel rose from €1.59 to €2.01 per litre over the same period, marking a 26% increase. That is more than double the rise recorded for petrol.

Bulgaria experienced the largest diesel increase at 43%. France followed closely with a 36% rise, while Estonia and Belgium recorded increases of 35% and 33%, respectively. Spain’s diesel prices rose by 27%, exceeding the EU average, while Germany and Italy saw increases of 23% and 24%.

See also  Transatlantic Tensions on Digital Rules Highlight Need for Cooperation

Despite the recent pullback, fuel prices remain high in many countries. The Netherlands currently has the highest petrol price in Europe at €2.28 per litre, followed by Denmark at €2.22. Germany, Greece and France all report petrol prices above €2 per litre.

For diesel, the Netherlands also tops the list at €2.30 per litre. Finland, France, Denmark and Belgium are close behind, all above €2.19.

At the other end of the scale, Malta has the lowest fuel prices in Europe. Petrol there costs €1.34 per litre, while diesel stands at just €1.21. Poland and Bulgaria also rank among the least expensive markets.

Fuel prices had already begun climbing before the strikes, but accelerated sharply in March and early April. Diesel briefly exceeded €2.10 per litre before retreating after the ceasefire announcement.

The latest price surge highlights Europe’s continued vulnerability to geopolitical shocks in energy-producing regions. With taxes accounting for a substantial share of pump prices and conventional vehicles still dominating European roads, households and businesses remain exposed to swings in global oil markets.

Continue Reading

Trending