Tech
Judge Stops Short of Forcing Google to Sell Chrome in Antitrust Case
A U.S. federal judge has ruled that Google will not be required to sell its Chrome browser, despite finding the company guilty of illegally maintaining a monopoly in online search. The decision, delivered Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in a 226-page order, imposes restrictions on some of Google’s practices but rejects the government’s bid for a broader breakup of the tech giant.
The ruling comes more than a year after Judge Mehta determined Google’s search business violated antitrust laws. While the decision curbs certain tactics that gave the company an edge, it stops short of banning lucrative default search contracts worth more than $26 billion annually. These deals, often with Apple and other device makers, make Google the default search engine on smartphones and computers.
Although Mehta acknowledged the agreements helped cement Google’s dominance, he concluded that outlawing them could do more harm than good, potentially destabilizing the industry. The judge also rejected the Justice Department’s push to force a divestiture of Chrome, calling it an “incredibly messy and highly risky” step unsupported by evidence that the browser was essential to Google’s monopoly.
Instead, Mehta ordered Google to open parts of its search database to rivals, including Bing and DuckDuckGo, granting them access to some of the data built up from trillions of user queries. Google had strongly opposed the move, warning it raised privacy and security concerns, but the court argued it was a fairer way to stimulate competition.
The Justice Department hailed the ruling as a “major win for the American people,” though officials signaled they may still push for stronger remedies. Advocacy groups, however, criticized the outcome as too lenient. “You don’t find someone guilty of robbing a bank and then sentence him to writing a thank you note for the loot,” said Nidhi Hegde, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project.
Google, meanwhile, portrayed the ruling as validation of its stance that competition in search is robust, especially with artificial intelligence reshaping the industry. “The decision recognises how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, the company’s vice president of regulatory affairs.
The ruling was welcomed by Apple, which earns more than $20 billion annually from Google through search placement deals. Apple had warned earlier this year that losing such contracts would hurt its own research efforts. Investors also appeared reassured: Alphabet shares surged more than 7 percent in after-hours trading, while Apple stock climbed 3 percent.
Google still faces mounting legal challenges. Later this month, the Justice Department is set to argue another antitrust case targeting the company’s digital advertising operations, potentially posing an even greater threat to its business model.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
