Connect with us

News

European Leaders Weigh Deployment of Troops to Ukraine in Future Peace Plan

Published

on

A group of European nations, led by the United Kingdom and France, has been quietly discussing a potential military deployment to Ukraine to help enforce any future peace agreement with Russia. The discussions have taken on a new sense of urgency amid fears that a future U.S. administration under Donald Trump could bypass European allies and strike a unilateral deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

UK and France at the Forefront

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed on Thursday that the UK would play a role in any post-war security framework for Ukraine but declined to provide specifics.

“I won’t get into the particular capabilities, but I do accept that if there is peace, then there needs to be some sort of security guarantee for Ukraine,” Starmer said.

The concept of European troops in Ukraine first gained traction in early 2024 when French President Emmanuel Macron refused to rule out deploying forces on the ground. His stance initially met strong opposition from Germany and Poland, but recent discussions indicate a shift in attitudes.

Behind-the-Scenes Talks

The first high-level talks on the idea took place in December 2024, at a private meeting at NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte’s residence in Brussels. Attendees included leaders and ministers from the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Denmark, and the Netherlands, along with top EU officials.

The plan is still in early stages, and several obstacles remain. Italy’s constitution limits its ability to send troops abroad, while the Dutch and German governments would require parliamentary approval before committing to a deployment. Poland, meanwhile, remains cautious due to historical tensions with Ukraine.

Challenges and Possible Deployment Size

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made clear that he envisions a force of 100,000 to 150,000 troops securing a post-war peace, while media reports suggest a smaller 30,000- to 40,000-strong European contingent. No final figure has been confirmed by European officials.

Estonia’s Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur emphasized that any deployment would depend on the conditions of a peace agreement. If Russian and Ukrainian forces agree to draw down troop levels, European forces could more easily maintain stability. However, if active fighting continues, the situation would become far more complex.

Ukraine’s Position and Future Alliances

During the Munich Security Conference, Zelenskyy argued that Ukraine’s military experience could play a pivotal role in Europe’s future security. He proposed the formation of a new military alliance, calling for an “Armed Forces of Europe” to counter Russia.

“Without the Ukrainian army, European armies will not be enough to stop Russia. This is the reality,” Zelenskyy stated.

However, he acknowledged that Ukraine lacks sufficient military equipment, including fighter jets and air defense systems.

“If we had 150 to 160 F-16 fighter jets and over 25 Patriot missile systems, why would we need U.S. or European troops?” he questioned.

Implications for NATO and the EU

Zelenskyy has insisted that if Ukraine is not granted NATO membership, an alternative security structure must be created—potentially involving European troops on the ground. He also warned that Russia could attack European NATO states from Belarus as soon as this year, increasing the urgency for Europe to develop a unified military response.

As discussions continue, European leaders must decide whether they are willing and able to send troops to Ukraine’s front lines—and what risks such a move could pose for relations with Russia.

News

Putin Announces Temporary Easter Ceasefire in Ukraine

Published

on

By

Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared a temporary ceasefire in Ukraine to mark the Easter holiday, according to a statement issued by the Kremlin on Saturday. The truce, described as a humanitarian gesture, will be in effect from 6:00 p.m. Moscow time (1500 GMT) on Saturday until midnight on Sunday (2100 GMT), following Orthodox Easter celebrations.

“Guided by humanitarian considerations, today from 18:00 to 00:00 from Sunday to Monday, the Russian side declares an Easter truce. I order that all military actions be stopped for this period,” President Putin was quoted as saying during a meeting with Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov. The announcement was made through the Kremlin’s official press service.

Putin expressed hope that Ukraine would reciprocate the gesture. “We assume that the Ukrainian side will follow our example,” he said, while also instructing Russian troops to remain vigilant. “At the same time, our troops must be ready to repel possible violations of the truce and provocations from the enemy, any of its aggressive actions.”

So far, there has been no official response from Kyiv regarding the proposed ceasefire. Ukrainian officials have yet to confirm whether they will observe the temporary truce.

The ceasefire announcement came on the same day Russia’s Defense Ministry claimed a military gain near the Ukraine border. Russian forces reportedly captured the village of Oleshnya in the Kursk region — one of the last Ukrainian footholds in that area, according to the ministry. However, the Associated Press noted that it could not independently verify the claim, and Ukrainian authorities have not issued a statement in response.

The announcement of the truce arrives amid continued hostilities in eastern and southern Ukraine, with both sides engaged in intense fighting despite periodic calls for peace. Previous attempts at temporary ceasefires, including those tied to religious holidays, have often failed to hold due to mutual accusations of violations.

The Kremlin’s move appears to be an attempt to frame Russia’s actions as being guided by humanitarian motives, possibly aimed at improving its international image during a deeply entrenched conflict. Nonetheless, observers remain skeptical about the effectiveness or sincerity of such temporary measures without a broader agreement in place.

The Orthodox Easter, a significant religious holiday in both Russia and Ukraine, is often seen as an opportunity for brief moments of reflection and reprieve from conflict. Whether this latest ceasefire will bring any tangible pause to the violence remains uncertain.

Continue Reading

News

US and Ukraine Sign Memorandum Paving Way for Controversial Mineral Deal

Published

on

By

Ukraine and the United States have signed a preliminary memorandum of intent aimed at finalizing a far-reaching economic partnership and reconstruction investment fund focused on mineral exploitation. The document, seen by Euronews, marks a significant step toward what could be a landmark agreement shaping Ukraine’s post-war economic recovery.

The memorandum, signed on Thursday by Ukraine’s First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, sets the stage for high-level negotiations in Washington between April 21 and 26. According to the document, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal will travel to Washington during that week to lend political backing to the final round of technical discussions.

The goal is to conclude talks by April 26 and sign the agreement shortly afterward. “Negotiating teams are expected to report on progress by April 26, 2025, with the aim of completing discussions by that date and signing as soon as possible,” the document reads.

The proposed agreement is not without controversy. It outlines the creation of a joint investment fund that would give the US considerable influence over Ukraine’s critical infrastructure and natural resources. The fund’s board would be made up of five members—three appointed by the US and two by Ukraine—effectively granting Washington veto power over major decisions.

Under the deal, Ukraine would be required to submit all major infrastructure and resource projects—including those involving roads, ports, railways, and mineral extraction—to the fund for approval. If rejected, Kyiv would be barred from offering the same projects to other countries under more favorable terms.

Furthermore, the US would receive all profits generated by the fund and a 4% annual return until the total military and financial assistance—estimated at €114 billion by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy—is repaid. This “payback” structure has been championed by former President Donald Trump, who remains a key figure in ongoing US foreign policy despite current tensions with Ukrainian leadership.

The agreement also notes potential legal conflicts with Ukraine’s EU accession obligations and international financial commitments. However, the US pledged not to interfere in those matters. “The United States respects Ukraine’s intention to avoid conflicts in the drafting of the agreement with Ukraine’s obligations under European Union accession,” the document states.

The deal comes amid growing tensions between the US and Ukraine. Relations have deteriorated since Trump initiated backchannel talks with Russian officials to end the war, reportedly excluding Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from the process. A heated Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy in February only deepened the rift.

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in Paris this week to consult with European allies. Speaking to reporters Friday, Rubio warned that Washington could pull out of peace negotiations if no meaningful progress is achieved soon.

As talks in Washington approach, the proposed investment fund is expected to dominate headlines—and draw scrutiny over its implications for Ukraine’s sovereignty and economic independence.

Continue Reading

News

Biden Blasts Trump Over Social Security Cuts in First Major Post-Presidency Speech

Published

on

By

In his first major public address since leaving office, former U.S. President Joe Biden launched a scathing critique of his successor, accusing President Donald Trump of dismantling the nation’s welfare system and putting millions of Americans at risk.

Speaking at a disability rights event in Chicago on Tuesday, Biden, 82, took aim at recent developments within the Social Security Administration (SSA), which provides vital benefits to over 70 million Americans. He warned that job cuts and funding reductions under Trump’s leadership could severely disrupt the delivery of services to some of the country’s most vulnerable citizens.

“In fewer than 100 days, this new administration has done so much damage and so much destruction. It’s kind of breathtaking,” Biden told the audience. “Social Security deserves to be protected for the good of the nation as a whole.”

Biden accused Trump of taking “a hatchet” to the country’s welfare safety net in a bid to slash federal spending. Though Trump has repeatedly vowed not to cut Social Security benefits, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an unofficial agency aligned with the administration, plans to eliminate 7,000 jobs from the SSA.

The plan is being overseen by DOGE head and Trump ally Elon Musk, who has controversially called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” The proposed staffing cuts have sparked widespread concern that benefit payments may be delayed or disrupted due to reduced agency capacity.

Already, thousands of SSA employees have departed the agency, leading to reports of website crashes and unresponsive customer service lines. Biden said such dysfunction could lead to “a calamity for millions of families” who rely on timely benefits.

Criticizing the speed and aggression of Trump’s budget cuts, Biden remarked that the administration is “shooting first and aiming later.” He emphasized the long-standing bipartisan consensus that Social Security should remain untouched, calling its preservation a moral obligation.

In response to Biden’s remarks, the Trump administration accused the former president of spreading misinformation. “He’s lying to Americans,” a White House spokesperson said.

Jason Turkish, a prominent disability lawyer based in Michigan who represents 32,000 clients, echoed Biden’s concerns. “There’s always been a belief that Social Security is just something we do not touch,” he said. “But now, people are genuinely worried.”

Since leaving office earlier this year, Biden has largely remained out of the political spotlight, aside from occasional public appearances. He was recently seen attending the opening night of Othello on Broadway and frequently commutes between his Delaware home and his Washington, D.C., office.

Tuesday’s address marks a return to the national stage for Biden and signals his growing concern over the direction of domestic policy under the Trump administration.

Continue Reading

Trending