Tech
US Warns European Tech Firms of Potential Fees Over “Discriminatory” Rules
US trade officials warned on X that European service providers could face fees and restrictions if the EU keeps “discriminatory” tech rules. The United States Trade Representative’s office posted last week a list of European companies that could be targeted if the European Union continues with measures seen as limiting the competitiveness of US service providers.
The statement said the US would consider introducing fees and other restrictions on foreign services if the European Union and its member states “insist on continuing to restrict, limit, and deter the competitiveness of US service providers through discriminatory means.”
The warning comes as tensions grow over Europe’s regulatory framework, which includes the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Digital Services Act (DSA), and AI Act, with further initiatives like the Digital Fairness Act expected to reshape digital trade. US officials argue these rules make it harder for American companies to compete in Europe, despite the US holding a services trade surplus with the EU of over €148 billion, including telecommunications, software, and professional services.
However, American messaging has struggled to resonate in Europe. Analysts say strong rhetoric and framing European regulations as a geopolitical threat can radicalise moderates, empower anti-American voices, and undermine transatlantic cooperation. Recent posts by tech executives, including Elon Musk, have amplified these concerns, sometimes drawing attention from unexpected quarters, such as Russian officials, which complicates the message further.
Some European firms, including Accenture, Amadeus, SAP, Siemens, DHL, Capgemini, Mistral AI, Publicis, and Spotify, were listed by the US as potential targets for retaliatory measures. The reasoning behind selecting these companies remains unclear, with some deeply partnered with US tech firms and others previously aligned with US positions on regulation.
Experts note that overregulation affects European companies as well. High compliance costs under frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) make data management 20 per cent more expensive for European founders compared with American competitors, according to former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi. EU rules targeting very large online platforms could also constrain the growth of European unicorns, placing them under the same scrutiny as US firms. Initiatives such as the Digital Omnibus aim to simplify regulations and support competitiveness, signaling some progress in addressing these challenges.
The US-EU trade agreement signed in August 2025 was expected to encourage more dialogue on these issues. Article 8 focuses on reducing non-tariff barriers, while Article 17 aims to address unjustified digital trade restrictions. Analysts warn that action must be taken before regulations like the DMA, DSA, and AI Act are fully implemented, as reversing them afterward is nearly impossible.
While the US warning reflects concerns about fair competition, many observers say constructive dialogue, rather than broad threats, is essential to ensure balanced regulation that supports both American and European tech growth.
Tech
Cyberattacks Intensify as Iran Conflict Spills Into Digital Domain
State-linked and hacktivist groups have claimed a series of cyberattacks against the United States and Israel since the war with Iran began, marking a significant escalation in the digital dimension of the conflict.
One of the most notable incidents involved Stryker, which confirmed on March 11 that a cyberattack had disrupted its global network. According to reports, employees encountered the logo of Handala, an إيران-linked hacking group, on login pages across the company’s systems. The breach reportedly targeted the firm’s Microsoft-based infrastructure, though the full extent of the disruption remains unclear.
Handala has claimed responsibility for the attack, stating it exploited cloud management systems to remotely wipe large numbers of devices worldwide. The group said the operation was carried out in retaliation for a missile strike in Iran. Independent verification of these claims is still pending.
Cybersecurity analysts say the attack is part of a broader campaign by groups linked to Iran’s security apparatus. According to findings from CloudSek, organisations associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have targeted US critical infrastructure. These include CyberAv3ngers, APT33 and APT55, which are accused of attempting to infiltrate industrial systems such as power grids and water facilities.
Experts say some of these groups use simple methods, including default passwords, to access systems, while others deploy malware aimed at disrupting operations or gathering intelligence. Additional networks linked to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence have also been active, targeting telecommunications, energy companies and government organisations.
At the same time, the United States and Israel are conducting their own cyber operations. General Dan Caine said US Cyber Command played a key role early in the conflict, disrupting Iranian communications and sensor networks. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that artificial intelligence and cyber tools are being used alongside conventional military operations.
Israeli intelligence has also reportedly relied on hacked data to support military planning, highlighting the growing role of cyber capabilities in modern warfare.
Hacktivist activity has surged as well. More than 60 groups formed a loose coalition known as the Cyber Islamic Resistance, coordinating attacks through online platforms. These groups have claimed hundreds of operations, including attempts to disrupt Israeli infrastructure and private sector systems. Analysts warn that such actors are often less restrained and may pose risks to civilian networks.
The conflict has also drawn in groups from outside the region, including actors based in Iraq, Russia and other parts of the Middle East. Some have targeted government websites and transport infrastructure, while pro-Israeli groups have carried out retaliatory attacks against Iranian entities.
Security experts say the growing scale and coordination of cyber operations reflect a shift in how modern conflicts are fought, with digital attacks now running parallel to military action on the ground.
Tech
Study Finds Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals in Popular Headphones Sold Across Europe
Tech
China Approves First Commercial Brain Implant as Neuralink Plans Mass Production
China has granted regulatory approval for the world’s first brain implant intended for commercial use, offering new hope for people with paralysis to regain hand movement. The device, developed by Neuracle Medical Technology, employs a brain-computer interface (BCI) that translates brain signals into physical actions.
BCIs link the nervous system to external devices, allowing users to control technology or prosthetics purely with thought. Neuracle’s system targets individuals whose paralysis stems from severe spinal cord injuries in the neck, which block signals from the brain from reaching the arms and hands.
The implant detects neural signals associated with the intent to move the hand. These signals are interpreted by software and transmitted to a robotic glove worn by the patient. The glove, powered by air-driven mechanisms, enables the hand to open and close, allowing users to grasp objects, according to CGTN.
Eligibility is limited to adults aged 18 to 60 who have experienced paralysis for at least one year and whose condition has remained stable for six months. The device is intended for patients unable to grip objects with their hands but who retain some movement in their upper arms.
China has been ramping up its investment in BCI technology, naming it a national strategic priority and highlighting it as a potential driver of future economic growth. Recent achievements include a successful implant by Shanghai NeuroXess, which allowed a 28-year-old man paralyzed for eight years to control digital devices with his thoughts within five days of receiving the implant.
The Neuracle approval comes as the race to commercialize BCIs intensifies worldwide. US entrepreneur Elon Musk, whose company Neuralink began human trials in 2024, recently announced plans to begin “high-volume production” of Neuralink devices in 2026.
As of September 2025, 12 participants with severe paralysis had received Neuralink implants, enabling them to operate digital and physical tools with thought alone. Musk’s announcement signals the company’s intent to scale access to BCIs beyond initial trials, positioning both China and the US at the forefront of this emerging field.
The development highlights a significant milestone in neurotechnology, potentially transforming the lives of millions living with paralysis. By translating intent into motion, these devices promise to restore independence to those previously constrained by spinal injuries, while also underscoring the global momentum toward commercial BCI applications.
With China now officially approving a commercial implant and Neuralink preparing for mass production, the coming years could see rapid adoption of technologies that bridge the human mind and machine.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement1 year agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia: Foreign Direct Investment Rises by 5.6% in Q1
