Tech
European Commission Launches Consultation on Digital Omnibus as Debate Over GDPR Reform Intensifies
The European Commission has opened a public consultation on the “Digital Omnibus,” a new initiative under its broader Digital Package on Simplification, aimed at reducing regulatory burdens for businesses while preserving the EU’s digital policy objectives.
The call for evidence, launched this week, will remain open until October 14, 2025, and invites citizens, companies, and organizations across Europe to share their views. It follows three earlier consultations — on the Data Union Strategy, the Cybersecurity Act review, and the Apply AI Strategy — which together generated more than 700 responses.
The Digital Omnibus will review a wide set of existing digital regulations, with a focus on streamlining rules in five key areas: the data acquis (including the Data Governance Act, Free Flow of Non-Personal Data Regulation, and Open Data Directive); cookie consent rules under the e-Privacy Directive; cybersecurity incident reporting obligations; the application of the AI Act; and elements of the European Digital Identity framework.
According to the Commission, the overall aim is to “reduce businesses’ administrative compliance costs without compromising the objectives of the underlying rules.” An accompanying document states that Brussels will also “explore the potential need for simplification measures in the realm of data regulation, to enhance data availability and sharing.”
The consultation comes as pressure builds for a wider overhaul of EU data law. Former European Central Bank president Mario Draghi last week publicly called for a comprehensive reform of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), describing it as an obstacle to data-driven innovation. Critics argue that the GDPR’s expansive definition of personal data, combined with member states’ uneven implementation, has created unnecessary barriers for European startups and scaleups.
Some governments have also been accused of “gold-plating” GDPR rules and resisting greater openness in data sharing, citing concerns about data transfers to non-EU countries, particularly the United States. Businesses say such restrictions limit Europe’s competitiveness in areas like artificial intelligence and digital services.
While the Commission’s Digital Omnibus consultation does not directly tackle GDPR reform, Draghi’s intervention has renewed calls for the EU to confront what many see as the “elephant in the room.” Analysts say that without addressing GDPR’s structural issues, the Omnibus exercise risks falling short of its ambition to meaningfully simplify Europe’s digital rulebook.
Defenders of the current framework argue that GDPR reform requires a separate legislative track and broader political consensus, pointing to ongoing interservice consultations and the Danish EU presidency’s current work on data governance.
Nevertheless, the Commission insists the Omnibus and the forthcoming “Digital Fitness Check” — a comprehensive review designed to stress-test the coherence of the EU’s digital acquis — reflect its commitment to simplification and better governance.
As Europe continues to navigate the balance between privacy, innovation, and competitiveness, the outcome of this consultation will be closely watched by businesses and policymakers alike.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
