Health
EU Health Ministers Push for Critical Medicines to Be Included in Defence Funding
A coalition of 11 EU health ministers is calling for the European Union to integrate funding for critical medicines into its broader defence strategy. The proposal, outlined in an op-ed published on Euronews, urges the inclusion of the upcoming Critical Medicines Act within the EU’s new defence spending framework, citing medicine security as a crucial element of European stability.
The ministers—from Belgium, Czechia, Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain—argue that without a secure supply of essential medicines, Europe’s defence capabilities could be at risk.
A Call for Strategic Investment in Medicine Security
The proposed Critical Medicines Act, set to be unveiled this week by the European Commission, aims to address severe shortages of essential medicines such as antibiotics, insulin, and painkillers. The initiative would focus on medicines that are difficult to source, often relying on a limited number of manufacturers or imports from non-EU countries.
The health ministers advocate for the act to be financed under the EU’s defence budget, allowing it to access part of the €800 billion expected to be mobilized under the Rearm Europe plan. This defence funding package, discussed at last week’s extraordinary EU summit, is designed to ramp up military and security spending across the bloc.
The proposal suggests embedding medicine production investments within a new €150 billion EU defence instrument, which would enable the Commission to borrow from capital markets, issue bonds, and lend to member states.
Parallels with U.S. Defence Strategy
In their op-ed, the ministers drew comparisons to the United States’ Defence Production Act (DPA), which classifies pharmaceutical supply chains as a national security concern. The DPA allows the U.S. government to map supply chains, identify vulnerabilities, and prioritize investments in domestic pharmaceutical production.
The European ministers warn that Europe’s heavy reliance on pharmaceutical imports from Asia—where up to 80% of key medicine ingredients are sourced—poses a serious risk in times of crisis or geopolitical tensions.
“If the supply chain of antibiotics is interrupted in the midst of an escalating conflict, routine surgeries become high-risk procedures, and easily treatable infections could turn fatal,” the ministers wrote. “Foreign actors could exploit this dependency, creating a major security risk for Europe.”
Budget Implications and Political Uncertainty
The push for integrating medicine funding into defence spending comes amid uncertainty over future EU health budgets. The EU4Health programme, launched in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, received €5.3 billion in funding, but recent cuts—including the reallocation of €1 billion to aid Ukraine—have raised concerns over its sustainability.
The European Commission’s next seven-year budget is expected to be tight, and there are indications that dedicated health funding could be merged with other sectors or even eliminated. The proposed defence-linked mechanism, however, could allow increased national health spending by temporarily exempting defence-related expenditures—including medicine security—from EU fiscal limits for four years.
Will the Proposal Gain Political Backing?
It remains uncertain whether the European Commission and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) will incorporate the ministers’ proposal into legislative talks on the Critical Medicines Act. While some policymakers may welcome a stronger pharmaceutical supply chain as part of Europe’s strategic autonomy, others may be reluctant to blur the lines between health policy and defence spending.
With the legislative proposal expected on Tuesday, the debate over how Europe secures its essential medicines is set to intensify in the coming weeks.
Health
North African Dust Set to Worsen Air Quality Across Portugal
Health
New Zealand Approves MDMA Treatment for Severe PTSD Under Strict Medical Controls
Health
Irregular Sleep Patterns Linked to Higher Anxiety Risk Among Teenagers
Teenagers who regularly change their sleeping patterns between weekdays and weekends may face a greater risk of anxiety, according to a new study from researchers at the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom.
The findings come as students return to school after the summer break, when many adolescents may have become accustomed to later nights and longer mornings. The shift back to early school schedules can create a mismatch between weekday and weekend sleep patterns, a phenomenon researchers describe as “social jet lag.”
A review of 12 studies involving more than 230,000 participants found that teenagers experiencing greater levels of social jet lag were more likely to report higher levels of anxiety. The relationship also appeared to work in the opposite direction, with higher anxiety associated with greater disruption to sleep schedules.
However, researchers stressed that the findings show an association rather than proving that irregular sleep directly causes anxiety.
The study highlights the importance of encouraging healthy and consistent sleeping habits as part of efforts to support adolescent mental health. Anxiety is already one of the most common mental health problems among young people.
The World Health Organization estimates that anxiety disorders affect about 4.4% of children aged 10 to 14 and 5.5% of those aged 15 to 19 worldwide. Such disorders involve persistent fear or nervousness that can be difficult to control.
Researchers say adolescence is a particularly important period for sleep because biological changes naturally alter young people’s body clocks.
Sarah Chellappa, a co-author of the study from the University of Southampton, said teenagers generally experience a shift toward later sleep during puberty.
“During puberty, the body’s internal clock usually shifts back by a few hours,” she said, meaning teenagers naturally become sleepy later and may need to wake later as well.
Early school starts can conflict with this biological change. Social activities, online communication and other demands can also reduce the amount of sleep teenagers get during the week.
Hannah Ravenhall, lead author of the study, said the issue should not be viewed solely as a matter of individual responsibility.
She said broader social systems can influence young people’s sleep and called for greater recognition of the biological changes that occur during adolescence.
The researchers suggested that schools could consider whether their start times adequately reflect teenagers’ changing sleep needs. Parents could also review evening routines, including rules around screen use.
Rather than simply encouraging teenagers to go to bed earlier, the researchers argue that more consistent schedules and changes to the environments in which young people live and study could help support better sleep and mental wellbeing.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
