Connect with us

Business

Nordic Nations Lead Europe in Public Perception of Tax Fairness, Study Finds

Published

on

Europeans remain deeply divided over whether their tax systems are fair, with citizens in Nordic and Western European countries expressing far greater confidence than those in the East, according to a new Eurobarometer survey published this week.

The 2025 study, which polled more than 25,000 people across the European Union, found that while taxes account for around 40 percent of the EU’s total economic output, perceptions of fairness vary sharply from one country to another. Overall, one in five respondents said taxes are paid “to a large extent” in proportion to income and wealth, while one in four felt that their country’s tax system is “not at all” fair.

Finland topped the rankings, with 38 percent of respondents believing taxes are fairly aligned with income levels, followed closely by Luxembourg (36 percent) and Denmark (32 percent). In contrast, only 8 percent in Latvia and 9 percent in Poland, Lithuania, and Czechia shared the same view. Among major economies, just 12 percent of Italians and 17 percent of Spaniards saw their tax systems as fair.

The study found that 51 percent of Europeans believe taxes are paid “to some extent” in proportion to wealth, while 24 percent think they are not. Hungary (50 percent), Croatia (48 percent), Estonia (47 percent), and Bulgaria (46 percent) recorded the highest dissatisfaction levels, suggesting a sharp East-West divide in public trust.

Experts say the disparity reflects differences in governance, institutional quality, and public service delivery. “Where citizens perceive procedures as transparent and rules as applied equally to all, tax morale and voluntary compliance tend to be strong,” said Professor Erich Kirchler, an economic psychologist at the University of Vienna.

See also  Netflix Shares Fall as Q3 Earnings Miss Estimates Amid Brazilian Tax Dispute

He noted that Nordic countries consistently rank high in perceptions of fairness because taxpayers there see clear value for their money through strong public services such as healthcare, childcare, and education. “High-quality services make the return on taxes visible,” Kirchler added.

Dr. Fabian Kalleitner of Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich said the effectiveness of redistribution also shapes attitudes. “Countries with low tax redistribution, such as Estonia, Latvia, or Hungary, show lower levels of fairness perception than high-redistribution countries such as Austria, Finland, or Denmark,” he explained.

Another factor is complexity. Professor Caren Sureth-Sloane of Paderborn University pointed out that simpler, more transparent systems foster trust. “Nordic countries make individual tax data public, which strengthens accountability,” she said.

Dr. Sabina Kołodziej of Kozminski University added that strong institutions and high societal trust underpin voluntary tax compliance in these nations. “These factors enable effective redistribution, resulting in more equal societies with low levels of poverty and inequality,” she said.

The findings highlight a persistent challenge for EU policymakers: rebuilding trust in tax systems, particularly in Eastern and Southern Europe, where skepticism remains high despite growing efforts to improve transparency and enforcement.

Business

US Allows Nvidia to Sell H200 Chips to Approved Chinese Customers With 25% Surcharge

Published

on

The United States has granted Nvidia permission to sell its H200 semiconductor chips to selected customers in China, provided the company pays a 25% surcharge to the US government. President Donald Trump announced the decision on Monday, marking a shift in Washington’s export policy after months of lobbying from Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang.

The approval, which will also extend to other American chipmakers such as Intel and AMD, follows earlier restrictions imposed over concerns that advanced US-made chips could strengthen China’s military and cyber capabilities. The agreement does not cover Nvidia’s more powerful Blackwell chips or the upcoming Rubin series, which remain prohibited for export.

Trump said in a post on Truth Social that he had personally informed Chinese President Xi Jinping of the decision and that the move would maintain strong national security protections. He described Xi’s response as “positive”.

The H200 chip is used in a wide range of high-performance computing applications, from medical technology to artificial intelligence systems. While not as powerful as the Blackwell line—considered the current benchmark in AI processing—the H200 remains significantly more advanced than chips produced by Chinese manufacturers.

Restrictions on China’s access to American semiconductors have been a central component of Washington’s technology policy. In April, the US barred sales of Nvidia’s H20 chip to China on national security grounds, even though the chip had been specifically designed to comply with existing export rules. That decision was later softened in July after Nvidia agreed to return 15% of its China revenue to the US government. AMD accepted a similar arrangement.

See also  UK and US Poised to Announce New Trade Deal Amid Tariff Tensions

Critics of the export controls argue that limiting access to foreign technology pushes China to accelerate its domestic semiconductor development. Beijing has already discouraged state-linked firms from buying Nvidia products, warning that reliance on US hardware could leave companies vulnerable to abrupt policy changes.

Nvidia said in a statement that allowing the sale of H200 chips to vetted commercial customers “strikes a thoughtful balance that is great for America”, adding that the arrangement would support well-paid US jobs and strengthen domestic production.

Despite the added safeguards, several Democratic senators have opposed the approval. They warned that giving China access to more capable chips could assist its military and expand its ability to carry out cyberattacks on American infrastructure. Their concerns were amplified by a recent admission from Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, which said its biggest competitive obstacle was the lack of access to cutting-edge semiconductors designed in the United States.

The decision opens one of Nvidia’s most important markets at a time when demand for advanced chips continues to surge globally, setting another stage in the ongoing technological and geopolitical rivalry between Washington and Beijing.

Continue Reading

Business

Gold Looks to 2026 After a Record-Breaking Year Marked by Geopolitical Tension and Strong Central Bank Demand

Published

on

Gold enters 2026 after one of the strongest years in its modern history, rising more than 60% in 2025 and setting over 50 record highs. The surge placed the metal ahead of all major asset classes and delivered its best performance since 1979. Now, investors are assessing whether gold can extend its momentum over the next year or whether the market is nearing a turning point.

Analysts say the 2025 rally was the product of several overlapping global forces. Persistent geopolitical risks, trade uncertainty, a softening US dollar, and expectations of lower interest rates all helped drive demand. Central banks also played a decisive role by continuing to absorb large volumes of gold, keeping official-sector buying well above pre-pandemic levels.

Data from the World Gold Council (WGC) highlights how these factors contributed to the metal’s rise. Geopolitical tensions alone added roughly 12 percentage points to year-to-date performance, while a weaker dollar and modestly lower rates provided another 10 points. Economic expansion and investor positioning also offered meaningful support.

Looking ahead, the WGC expects many of the same pressures to influence the market in 2026. But it cautions that gold begins the year from a very different starting point. Prices have already factored in broad expectations of steady global growth, moderate rate cuts, and a stable dollar. With real interest rates no longer falling sharply and momentum cooling, the Council describes gold as fairly valued at current levels.

In its central outlook, the WGC projects gold trading in a narrow band next year, with returns likely ranging between a 5% decline and a 5% gain. The group notes that investor sentiment is balanced rather than defensive, reducing the likelihood of outsized moves unless economic conditions shift significantly.

See also  Iran Holds Back Advanced Missile Arsenal Amid Tensions with Israel, Signaling Strategic Calculations

Three alternative scenarios could force a deviation from this baseline. In a mild economic slowdown marked by extra US rate cuts, gold could rise 5% to 15% as investors position more cautiously. A deeper recession could push gains even higher, with the WGC estimating a potential 15% to 30% jump driven by aggressive policy easing and renewed safe-haven flows. On the other hand, if pro-growth policies from the Trump administration lift yields and strengthen the dollar, gold could fall 5% to 20% as opportunity costs rise.

Despite the WGC’s measured tone, major Wall Street institutions remain bullish. J.P. Morgan Private Bank expects prices to climb to between $5,200 and $5,300 per ounce, while Goldman Sachs forecasts around $4,900. Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley also see room for appreciation, though both acknowledge possible volatility in the coming months.

Much of this optimism is tied to ongoing demand from central banks, especially in emerging markets, and the belief that many global investors remain underexposed to gold. Softening real yields and persistent geopolitical uncertainty are also seen as supportive.

At the same time, risks could hinder further gains. A stronger US economy, renewed inflation pressures, or reduced central bank buying could weigh on the market. Rising supply from recycled gold, particularly in India where the metal is widely used as collateral, may also place pressure on prices.

While a repeat of 2025’s dramatic rise appears unlikely, analysts agree that gold enters the new year from a position of strength. Its reputation as a hedge during unpredictable times remains firmly intact, keeping it central to many investors’ long-term strategies.

See also  European Stock Markets Soar Despite U.S. Tariff Threats
Continue Reading

Business

Goldman Sachs Warns Europe Faces Economic Strain as China’s Export Push Intensifies

Published

on

China’s strengthening export momentum is emerging as a significant threat to Europe’s economic outlook, with Goldman Sachs cautioning that major EU economies could face notable GDP losses as Beijing doubles down on an export-led recovery strategy. The investment bank has cut its eurozone growth forecasts, warning that Europe is increasingly exposed to rising global trade competition at a time of limited policy flexibility.

Giovanni Pierdomenico, an economist at Goldman Sachs, said the euro area is “particularly exposed” to the impact of increased Chinese goods supply, which risks widening the region’s growing trade deficit with China and undermining its already weakened competitive position. The bank estimates that stronger Chinese export competition will reduce eurozone GDP by about 0.5% by the end of 2029.

Germany is projected to face the heaviest hit, with real GDP expected to be 0.9% lower over the next four years due to pressure from Chinese exports. Italy is forecast to see a 0.6% impact, while France and Spain are each expected to register declines of around 0.4%.

Goldman analysts point to a sharp shift in global market dynamics: in the past five years, eurozone exporters have lost as much as four percentage points of market share to Chinese firms across major global markets. The bank estimates that for every one-dollar increase in Chinese exports, European exports typically fall between twenty and thirty cents, illustrating the scale of substitution taking place. This trend, analysts say, is steadily eroding Europe’s competitive edge.

European policymakers have announced a series of measures aimed at strengthening strategic resilience, including the Critical Raw Materials Act and the AI Continent Action Plan. But Goldman Sachs remains doubtful that these initiatives will be enough to counter China’s export dominance. Analyst Filippo Taddei notes that the EU’s response is constrained by structural vulnerabilities — particularly its heavy reliance on China for key components and raw materials.

See also  Global Stocks Fall as Tech Valuations and Fed Rate Uncertainty Weigh on Markets

Goldman warns that while selective action against certain Chinese products is possible, broader restrictions could disrupt supply chains central to Europe’s industrial activity. At the same time, the bank highlights that many EU programmes intended to shore up competitiveness remain underfunded relative to their ambitions.

Defence is the only sector where Europe has committed substantial financial resources, with the Readiness 2030 programme backed by €150 billion in loans under the Security Action for Europe scheme. Even this effort, however, relies on Chinese supplies of rare earth elements essential for advanced military systems.

The bank concludes that without a more unified and assertive industrial strategy, Europe risks losing further ground in global markets it once dominated. Policymakers now face difficult decisions over how to reinforce Europe’s industrial base while managing its dependence on Chinese inputs — and how long the region can rely on fiscal support and consumer strength to cushion its economy against mounting external pressures.

Continue Reading

Trending