Connect with us

Business

Mediobanca Rejects €7 Billion Takeover Bid from MPS, Citing Value Destruction

Published

on

Milan-based Mediobanca has turned down a €7 billion all-share takeover bid from Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS), calling the offer “destructive of value” and dismissing it as lacking industrial and financial rationale. The decision sets the stage for one of Italy’s most contentious banking disputes in recent years.

In a statement released Tuesday, Mediobanca’s Board of Directors warned that the proposed merger would erode shareholder value, alienate top-tier clients, and undermine its independent advisory model. “The Board finds that the Offer is devoid of industrial and financial rationale and is therefore destructive for Mediobanca,” the statement read.

Mediobanca has carved out a niche in Italy’s banking sector, focusing on high-margin businesses such as investment banking and wealth management, which generate steady revenues. The bank expressed concern that merging with MPS, which relies heavily on retail banking, would weaken its business model and strategic independence.

Diverging Strategies at Play
The clash between the two institutions highlights contrasting visions for the future. Mediobanca has pivoted away from traditional lending, emphasizing advisory services and wealth management. Its reputation as an independent financial advisor is a key asset, which it fears would be compromised by MPS’s retail-oriented approach.

MPS, the world’s oldest bank, sees the merger as a chance to create a more competitive banking group capable of achieving €700 million in annual cost synergies. However, Mediobanca dismissed these claims, arguing that the two banks’ differing distribution networks would limit cost-cutting opportunities.

MPS’s recent history of financial instability has also raised concerns. Following a €2.5 billion state bailout in 2017, the Siena-based bank remains focused on retail and SME banking, sectors Mediobanca views as less profitable and more vulnerable to economic fluctuations.

See also  Trump Slaps New Tariffs on Imported Wood and Furniture, Citing National Security Concerns

Market Reactions and Bid Details
Last Friday, MPS launched its surprise all-share offer, proposing 23 MPS shares for every 10 Mediobanca shares. The deal valued Mediobanca’s stock at €15.99 per share, representing a 5% premium to its closing price on January 23.

Despite the premium, Mediobanca pointed out that the bid implied a 3% discount to its pre-announcement stock price—a rare scenario in takeover offers, where bidders typically provide a significant premium to win shareholder approval.

Investor sentiment reflects skepticism about MPS’s ability to execute the deal. Since the bid was announced, MPS shares have dropped nearly 10%, while Mediobanca shares initially rose 8% before slipping 3.5% on Tuesday after the rejection was confirmed.

Looking Ahead
The failed bid underscores the strategic divide between the two banks and raises questions about the future direction of Italy’s banking sector. While MPS seeks growth through consolidation, Mediobanca remains focused on protecting its niche business model, prioritizing independence over scale.

Business

Europe’s Cooling Energy Demand Doubles as Record Heatwaves Drive Air Conditioning Use

Published

on

Household energy consumption for cooling across the European Union has nearly doubled in six years as rising temperatures and more frequent heatwaves increase reliance on air conditioning, according to new data highlighting the growing impact of climate change on energy demand.

The figures come as June 2026 became the hottest June ever recorded in western Europe and the second warmest globally, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service. Globally, 2024, 2023 and 2025 now rank as the three hottest years on record.

EU household energy consumption for space cooling climbed from 40.5 thousand terajoules (TJ) in 2018 to 80.4 thousand TJ in 2024, an increase of 99%. Compared with 2010, when consumption stood at just 15.5 thousand TJ, cooling-related energy use has surged by 420% over the past 14 years.

The increase has not been uniform across Europe. Austria recorded the largest percentage rise, with household cooling energy consumption jumping from 22 TJ in 2018 to 253 TJ in 2024, representing an increase of more than 1,000%. Analysts noted that such dramatic growth partly reflects the country’s previously low use of air conditioning.

Among EU member states, Czechia recorded a 244% increase, followed by Italy with a 193% rise. Energy consumption for cooling also more than doubled in Hungary, Finland, Spain, Slovenia and Greece during the same period.

In contrast, France registered a 52% increase, while Germany saw relatively modest growth of 8%.

Although cooling demand is rising rapidly, it still accounts for less than 1% of total household energy consumption across the EU, averaging 0.84% in 2024. The share is considerably higher in warmer regions.

See also  Trump Slaps New Tariffs on Imported Wood and Furniture, Citing National Security Concerns

Cyprus recorded the highest proportion, with 16% of household energy used for cooling, followed by Malta at 15% and EU candidate country Albania at 13.4%. Greece devoted 7.4% of household energy to cooling, while Spain, Italy and Croatia also reported shares above 2%.

Italy remains the EU’s largest consumer of cooling energy, using 26.3 thousand TJ in 2024, equivalent to nearly one-third of the bloc’s total cooling energy demand. Spain ranked second with 14.3 thousand TJ, while Turkey, included among candidate countries, recorded the third-highest level.

The surge in cooling demand has already affected electricity markets. During the June 2026 heatwaves, power consumption rose sharply across Europe’s four largest economies. France experienced the largest increase, with grid operator RTE estimating that every one-degree Celsius rise in temperature adds between 0.7 and 1 gigawatt of electricity demand. Cooling needs alone contributed an estimated additional 10 to 14 gigawatts during the hottest days.

Higher electricity demand, combined with reduced wind generation in Germany and temporary cuts to French nuclear output caused by unusually warm river water, pushed wholesale electricity prices above €200 per megawatt-hour in Germany, nearly €160 in France and more than €110 in Spain.

Scientists continue to warn that Europe is warming at roughly twice the global average, making the continent increasingly vulnerable to extreme heat and placing growing pressure on energy systems as cooling becomes an essential part of daily life.

Continue Reading

Business

China’s June Exports Surge 27% as AI Demand and Vehicle Shipments Boost Trade

Published

on

China’s exports posted stronger-than-expected growth in June, rising 27 percent from a year earlier as booming demand linked to artificial intelligence and robust overseas sales of vehicles and technology products lifted trade, according to data released by the country’s customs agency.

The June performance marked a sharp acceleration from the 19.4 percent annual increase recorded in May and exceeded economists’ expectations. Imports also gathered pace, climbing 36 percent year on year after a 27.4 percent rise in May. Analysts said higher import costs resulting from the conflict involving Iran contributed to the increase in import values.

China’s monthly trade surplus widened to $125.6 billion in June from $105.4 billion in May, reflecting continued strength in exports despite concerns about slowing domestic demand.

Julian Evans-Pritchard, Head of China Economics at Capital Economics, said trade values experienced another significant increase during June.

“Trade values took another big leg up in June,” he said in a research note, adding that higher semiconductor prices driven by the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence played a major role. He also noted that demand for Chinese goods remained resilient beyond the technology sector.

Exports of electric vehicles, conventional automobiles and other advanced technology products continued to support manufacturing activity as global investment in artificial intelligence increased demand for semiconductors, electronic components and related equipment.

The export sector has helped offset weaker domestic consumption and investment, which continue to face pressure from China’s prolonged property market downturn.

During the first six months of 2026, exports increased 17.6 percent compared with the same period last year, while imports rose 26.6 percent, according to customs figures.

See also  Fed Faces Pivotal Decision on Interest Rates Amid Political Pressure and Economic Strains

China’s expanding trade surplus has continued to draw attention from policymakers in the United States and Europe, where concerns have grown over widening trade imbalances. In response to higher tariffs and other trade barriers, many Chinese manufacturers have expanded production facilities overseas, particularly in Europe, while exports to Southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa have continued to grow.

June exports to Southeast Asia climbed nearly 35 percent from a year earlier. Shipments to the European Union increased by more than 18 percent, while exports to Latin America rose over 28 percent. Exports to the United States advanced almost 14 percent, partly reflecting weaker shipments during the same period last year after higher tariffs were introduced following President Donald Trump’s return to office.

Wei Li, Head of Multi-Asset Investments at BNP Paribas Securities China, said export growth is expected to continue but warned that future performance remains vulnerable to changing global demand and regulatory measures affecting key industries such as electric vehicles and artificial intelligence.

China is scheduled to release its April-to-June economic growth figures on Wednesday. The government has set a growth target of between 4.5 percent and 5 percent for 2026, slightly below the 5 percent expansion recorded last year. The International Monetary Fund recently raised its forecast for China’s economic growth this year to 4.6 percent but expects growth to slow to 4.1 percent in 2027 as policymakers continue efforts to stimulate consumer spending.

Continue Reading

Business

Property Taxes Across Europe Vary Widely, with Belgium Among the Costliest and Cyprus the Most Affordable

Published

on

Buying property in Europe can involve far more than the purchase price, as homeowners face a range of taxes from acquisition through ownership and eventual sale. A review by the Global Property Guide shows significant differences in how European countries tax real estate, with Belgium emerging as one of the most expensive markets for property owners, while Cyprus and Malta remain among the least heavily taxed.

Property owners across Europe may encounter four main taxes: transfer tax at the time of purchase, annual property tax, tax on rental income and capital gains tax when selling. The amount paid depends not only on tax rates but also on how each country calculates taxable values, making direct comparisons challenging.

Rental income taxes show some of the widest differences across the continent. For non-resident landlords earning €1,500 a month in rent, Denmark imposes the highest tax rate at 42.11 percent, followed by the Netherlands at 36 percent and Finland at 30 percent. Cyprus does not charge tax at that income level, while Luxembourg applies a rate of just 2.94 percent.

For higher rental income of €12,000 per month, Belgium records the highest tax burden at 47.27 percent. Denmark follows with 43.22 percent, while Germany and Greece each apply rates of 41 percent. Italy, Portugal and the Netherlands maintain relatively stable tax rates regardless of rental income, unlike countries with progressive tax systems such as Austria, where rental earnings are taxed alongside personal income.

Transfer taxes also differ sharply. Belgium charges up to 12.5 percent in some regions, meaning buyers of a €500,000 property could pay as much as €62,500 in tax before taking ownership. Regional incentives for owner-occupiers can reduce that amount, particularly in Wallonia and Brussels. At the opposite end of the scale, Estonia and the Czech Republic impose no transfer tax, while Lithuania’s acquisition costs are around 0.4 percent of the purchase price.

See also  ECB Maintains Cautious Stance Ahead of September Meeting, Refrains from Pre-Commitment on Rate Cuts

Annual property taxes vary because countries use different methods to determine taxable values. Spain’s maximum property tax rate can reach 4.8 percent, although it is based on cadastral values rather than current market prices. In the United Kingdom, council tax on a home worth about €300,000 generally ranges between €2,000 and €3,200 annually. France, Belgium and Spain typically collect lower annual amounts because taxes are calculated using older assessed property values. Cyprus and Malta do not levy annual property taxes.

Capital gains taxes also differ considerably. Denmark taxes profits from property sales at rates of up to 52.07 percent when gains are included with personal income. Germany offers one of Europe’s most favourable systems, exempting gains entirely if the property has been owned for more than 10 years. Malta applies a different approach by charging a transaction tax on the sale price rather than taxing the capital gain itself.

The report concludes that Belgium remains one of Europe’s most heavily taxed property markets due to its combination of high purchase duties, rental income taxes and ongoing ownership costs. Cyprus and Malta continue to rank among the most attractive destinations for property investors because of their lighter tax regimes, highlighting the wide differences that remain across Europe’s real estate markets.

Continue Reading

Trending