Connect with us

Tech

France Ranks Last in Global AI Adoption Among Public Servants, Study Finds

Published

on

France ranks last in a new global index measuring artificial intelligence adoption in government, with nearly half of its public servants reporting that they have never used AI at work, despite substantial government investment in the technology.

The Public Sector AI Adoption Index 2026, released on Monday by Public First for the Center for Data Innovation with support from Google, surveyed 3,335 civil servants across 10 countries, including the United States, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, Brazil, South Africa, India, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia. The study highlights a gap between ambitious AI strategies and actual implementation in European governments.

According to the index, 74 percent of French public servants said AI cannot perform any part of their work, and about 45 percent reported never using AI on the job. Only 27 percent noted that their organisations had invested in AI tools, and many said guidance from leadership on AI use was unclear.

“While France positions AI as a strategic tool for competitiveness and modernisation, without hands-on experience, its value remains abstract for many workers,” the report stated. Researchers warned that 70 percent of employees who actively use AI in organisations with limited guidance are doing so in “shadow” mode, meaning they operate AI tools without informing their employers.

Across Europe, adoption of AI in public services remains cautious. Germany and France were grouped as risk-averse countries, where AI is limited to specialists and pilot projects. The United Kingdom showed more progress, with 37 percent of public servants receiving AI training, but adoption remains uneven across departments and access to approved tools is limited.

See also  France to Replace Microsoft Teams and Zoom with Domestic Platform by 2027

By contrast, countries such as Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and India led the index. Public servants in these countries report widespread, everyday use of AI in government work, supported by clear leadership guidance and training programmes. Globally, 74 percent of public servants now use AI, and 80 percent say it empowers them, but only 18 percent believe their governments are using AI very effectively.

The survey assessed adoption across five areas: attitudes toward AI, confidence in using it, access to approved tools, integration of AI in daily work, and access to training. Experts said these factors determine whether governments can translate ambitious AI strategies into tangible improvements in public services.

“Many governments have ambitious plans for AI in the public sector, but some are creating better conditions for real‑world use than others,” said Rachel Wolf, CEO of Public First. “Our research shows who is succeeding and where improvement is needed. This matters because effective AI enables better public services, stronger outcomes for citizens, and more resilient public institutions.”

The findings raise questions about the effectiveness of France’s AI initiatives, which have included significant investment in infrastructure and ethical frameworks aimed at guiding responsible AI deployment in government. Analysts said closing the gap between strategy and practical use will be critical for the country to realise the benefits of AI for public services.

Tech

Sweden’s ‘W’ Platform Joins Europe’s Push to Build Big Tech Alternative

Published

on

A new Sweden-based social media platform called “W” has entered the growing field of European tech initiatives seeking to challenge the dominance of US-based Big Tech companies, as the European Commission announced its participation on Wednesday.

The platform, which was first introduced at the World Economic Forum in January, promotes itself as a digital space built on “verified human users, transparency, privacy and free speech.” It has now launched a beta version, with access limited to users who pass a vetting process before being allowed to post content.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa are among the early official users of the platform, signalling political support for the initiative. Users are required to verify their identity either by registering their real name or by using “W Identity,” a separate verification tool that scans passports or national identity documents directly on a user’s device.

According to the company, W was developed by a group of entrepreneurs working across media, technology and artificial intelligence. The platform states that it plans to host data exclusively on European servers operated by European companies, aligning its infrastructure with EU data protection standards.

CEO Anna Zeiter has said the platform intends to rely on European service providers, including Switzerland-based encrypted email company Proton and Finland’s cloud computing firm UpCloud, as part of its commitment to privacy-focused operations within Europe.

The launch comes amid a broader push across the continent to reduce dependence on US technology giants and strengthen what policymakers describe as “digital sovereignty.” Governments in France, Germany and the Netherlands have previously raised concerns that reliance on foreign-owned platforms could expose Europe to security risks and limit control over sensitive data.

See also  Nvidia Executive: Humanoid Robots Are the Next Frontier in AI, and They're Coming Soon

W is part of a wider wave of European alternatives to mainstream social media networks. Other emerging platforms include Bulle in France, Eurosky, Monnett and eYou, all aiming to offer regionally governed digital ecosystems.

Some of these platforms recently signed a declaration supporting the development of Europe’s “social stack,” a shared digital infrastructure intended to provide a more diverse and resilient online environment. The initiative argues for reducing reliance on dominant global platforms and promoting alternatives with governance structures rooted in Europe.

However, analysts have noted that competing with established social media giants presents significant challenges. Experts have pointed out that new platforms often struggle to maintain large user bases, as they typically lack the scale, engagement features and convenience that have made existing networks dominant in global digital communication.

Despite these challenges, supporters of W and similar projects say the push reflects a broader effort to reshape Europe’s digital landscape and assert greater control over data, privacy and online governance in an increasingly competitive global tech environment.

Continue Reading

Tech

European Governments Move to Cut Dependence on Palantir Amid Rising Security and Privacy Concerns

Published

on

European governments are increasingly seeking to reduce their reliance on US data analytics firm Palantir, as political scrutiny grows over the company’s role in defence, policing and intelligence operations across the continent. Officials in several countries have raised concerns about digital sovereignty, privacy risks and the long-term dependence on foreign technology providers in sensitive state systems.

In the Netherlands, State Secretary for Defence Derk Boswijk told parliament this week that the country aims to have a “fully fledged alternative” to Palantir within two years. He said the company has been used in a “very limited, compartmentalised, and small scale” capacity since 2010, but added that the government is now pursuing a “two-track policy” to reduce dependency and ensure independent capability in data-driven defence systems.

Dutch lawmakers are also examining broader concerns about the company’s role in government infrastructure. One politician, Michelle Jagtenberg, questioned Palantir’s suitability for public contracts, citing allegations of “racist and anti-democratic ideology.” The discussion follows a parliamentary motion passed in 2025 calling for reduced reliance on the firm and greater use of European-developed alternatives.

Similar concerns are emerging across Europe. A UK parliamentary report described Palantir’s systems as creating an “unacceptable point of weakness” in national infrastructure, while Switzerland has reportedly rejected at least nine bids from the company due to security considerations. Denmark is also working to identify domestic alternatives to replace its existing systems.

Palantir’s platforms are widely used for analysing large datasets in defence and intelligence operations. Its Gotham software has been linked to military targeting systems, which the company describes as supporting an “AI-powered kill chain” for decision-making. Critics, however, argue that such tools raise serious ethical and transparency concerns, particularly when deployed in conflict zones or law enforcement.

See also  EU Pushes AI Adoption as Use Remains Uneven Across Europe

The company’s leadership has also drawn controversy. Co-founder Peter Thiel and CEO Alex Karp have both faced criticism for remarks about the use of military technology. Karp has previously described Palantir’s software as a tool intended to “disrupt” and, when necessary, be used in lethal operations, comments that have intensified public debate over the company’s role in modern warfare.

Human rights organisations, including Amnesty International, have raised concerns about Palantir’s handling of sensitive data, including healthcare information processed through contracts with the UK’s National Health Service. The group has warned about risks related to privacy, transparency and the scale of data access granted under government agreements.

Despite growing opposition, Palantir continues to hold contracts across Europe. The United Kingdom remains a major client, including defence agreements worth hundreds of millions of pounds. Germany, Spain and Denmark also continue to use the company’s systems in varying capacities, although several governments are now actively exploring alternatives from European technology providers.

As debates intensify over digital sovereignty and national security, European policymakers appear increasingly divided between maintaining existing systems and building independent data infrastructure free from reliance on US defence technology firms.

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft Unveils In-House AI Models and Quantum Breakthrough as Tech Giant Moves to Reduce External Dependence

Published

on

Microsoft has taken a major step toward reducing its reliance on external artificial intelligence partners, unveiling seven in-house AI models at its Build 2026 developer conference in San Francisco. The move signals a strategic shift as the company seeks greater control over its AI stack while its key investee firms prepare for high-profile public listings.

Satya Nadella, Microsoft’s chief executive, told attendees that the industry is entering a new phase in which companies must do more than simply consume frontier AI systems. “We believe the time has come for every company to move from consuming a frontier model to fully participating at the frontier,” he said.

At the centre of the announcement is MAI-Thinking-1, Microsoft’s first reasoning model built entirely from scratch using commercially licensed data and without distillation from external systems. The model includes 35 billion active parameters and a 256,000-token context window, designed for complex reasoning tasks, coding, and long-form instruction handling.

Microsoft also introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash, a coding-focused model integrated into GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code, aimed at converting natural language prompts into functional software code. The company said these tools will run on Azure infrastructure, allowing it to reduce costs currently paid to external model providers and potentially offer cheaper services to developers.

Mustafa Suleyman, chief executive of Microsoft AI, said internal testing suggested strong performance gains. After optimisation for consulting firm McKinsey, he said the new models outperformed OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 in quality while offering what Microsoft estimates as up to ten times better cost efficiency, based on scaled public pricing comparisons.

See also  Wikipedia Challenges UK Online Safety Regulations Over Volunteer Privacy Concerns

In independent evaluations conducted by Surge, Microsoft’s third-party rating partner, MAI-Thinking-1 was reportedly preferred over Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.6, while matching Claude Opus 4.6 on coding benchmarks.

Alongside its AI announcements, Microsoft revealed progress in quantum computing. The company’s new Majorana 2 chip is said to be 1,000 times more stable than its predecessor, extending qubit lifespan from milliseconds to an average of 20 seconds. While still far from practical deployment, Microsoft believes this marks a meaningful step toward scalable quantum machines.

Zulfi Alam, corporate vice president of Microsoft Quantum, said the company aims to deliver a commercially useful quantum system by 2029, though current prototypes contain only 12 qubits, far short of the millions required for full-scale systems.

The announcements come as Microsoft’s AI partners move toward public markets. Anthropic has filed confidentially for an IPO following a major funding round valuing it at $965 billion, while OpenAI is also preparing a filing. Microsoft has invested heavily in both companies, committing billions of dollars while integrating their models into Azure.

The new direction suggests Microsoft is positioning itself to compete directly with its own partners, as the race for dominance in advanced AI and next-generation computing intensifies.

Continue Reading

Trending