Connect with us

News

Supreme Court Halts Deportation of Venezuelans Amid Trump Immigration Crackdown

Published

on

The U.S. Supreme Court has dealt a fresh blow to the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration agenda, blocking the swift deportation of a group of Venezuelan detainees held in a North Texas facility. The court’s decision marks another setback in the administration’s push to accelerate removals of undocumented immigrants.

In a ruling issued Friday, the justices sided with attorneys for a group of Venezuelan men accused by immigration authorities of gang affiliation — a classification the administration argues makes them eligible for expedited removal under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. The court emphasized that individuals must be granted the opportunity to contest their deportation, though it did not address the broader legality of invoking the centuries-old law in the case.

The Supreme Court had previously issued a temporary stay on the deportations last month, citing concerns that removals were imminent. This latest ruling reinforces the requirement for due process in immigration proceedings, a principle Trump and his allies have often criticized as a barrier to swift enforcement.

In response to the decision, former President Donald Trump expressed his frustration on Truth Social, writing, “THE SUPREME COURT WON’T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!”

At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security has made an unprecedented request for 20,000 National Guard troops to assist in immigration enforcement efforts nationwide. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the Pentagon is reviewing the request, which would involve deploying state-based Guard units to support deportation operations beyond the southern border.

According to DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin, the move is part of Trump’s mandate “to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens.” Unlike previous deployments focused on the U.S.-Mexico border, these troops would operate across the interior of the country, raising questions about federal overreach and state authority.

See also  China Launches First Next-Generation Amphibious Assault Ship, Advancing Naval Capabilities

Currently, around 10,000 troops are stationed along the border, where they provide logistical support, surveillance, and limited law enforcement assistance. While some have begun accompanying border agents in the newly militarized zones, direct detention of migrants remains the responsibility of immigration authorities.

The Supreme Court’s intervention underscores the legal and political complexities surrounding Trump’s immigration crackdown, as courts, civil liberties groups, and local governments continue to push back against sweeping federal enforcement strategies.

News

Over 180 Migrants Caught After Crossing Poland via Belarus Border Tunnel

Published

on

Polish authorities have detained more than 130 migrants after they illegally entered the country through a tunnel under the border with Belarus, with searches ongoing for others still at large.

The migrants were detected after emerging from a tunnel dug beneath a dam near Narewka in the Podlasie region. Polish Border Guard officials said the tunnel stretched nearly 100 metres and stood around 1.5 metres high. Its entrance on the Belarusian side was concealed in a forest approximately 50 metres from the border, while the exit was just 10 metres inside Poland.

Border officials credited integrated electronic monitoring systems for quickly locating the migrants. Soldiers, police officers, and tracking dogs joined the operation, allowing authorities to apprehend most of the group soon after they crossed.

The majority of those detained were Afghan and Pakistani nationals, although officials said the group also included citizens of India, Nepal, and Bangladesh. Two suspected smugglers were arrested during the operation: a 69-year-old Polish man and a 49-year-old Lithuanian. Both are believed to have been transporting migrants toward western Europe. Investigations into the smuggling network are ongoing.

This is the fourth tunnel discovered this year by officers from the Podlasie Branch of the Border Guard, highlighting continued attempts to circumvent border controls. Officials stressed that a combination of electronic surveillance and physical safeguards made it possible to respond rapidly to these breaches.

Polish authorities have maintained a high level of vigilance along the country’s eastern border, which has seen increasing attempts at illegal crossings in recent years. The use of tunnels represents a growing trend in sophisticated smuggling operations, challenging border security forces to adapt quickly.

See also  Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Effort to Dismantle Voice of America

The Podlasie region has been a focal point for migrant crossings due to its proximity to Belarus. In previous incidents, authorities discovered similar tunnels, indicating organized efforts by human traffickers to facilitate illegal entry into the European Union.

Border Guard officials reiterated that their rapid response and cooperation with other security forces were crucial in preventing a larger number of migrants from entering undetected. The ongoing search operation aims to locate any remaining individuals who may have escaped initial detection.

Authorities continue to monitor the area and strengthen measures to prevent future illegal crossings. The discovery of the tunnel and the apprehension of the migrants and alleged smugglers underscore the challenges faced by Poland and other EU countries in securing their borders amid ongoing regional migration pressures.

Continue Reading

News

European Parliament Votes Could Decide Fate of EU-Mercosur Trade Deal

Published

on

Three upcoming votes in the European Parliament could determine the future of the EU-Mercosur trade deal, potentially altering or even derailing what would be the European Union’s largest free trade agreement. The agreement, which took over two decades to negotiate and was finalized last year, requires approval from both EU member states and EU lawmakers to enter into force.

The first vote, scheduled for December’s plenary session, focuses on a bilateral safeguard clause for agricultural products. Proposed in October, the clause aims to protect EU farmers from an influx of cheaper South American goods. Known as the “reciprocity clause,” it would allow the EU to temporarily withdraw tariff preferences for products from Mercosur countries if they fail to meet EU standards for the environment, animal welfare, and production practices.

Belgian MEP Benoit Cassart, a supporter of the clause, said it ensures Mercosur countries establish supply chains that meet EU standards before accessing European markets. The vote on the full safeguard package is set for Tuesday, December 16, in Strasbourg.

If approved, the safeguards would still need agreement from EU member states. A special fast-track procedure could enable Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to travel to Brazil to sign the deal before the end of the year. However, the measure is contentious. Critics argue it could violate World Trade Organization rules and may be impractical to enforce, while some parliamentary amendments might push for removal of the clause.

Support for the clause in the Parliament’s international trade committee (INTA) was narrowly secured by a single vote, with the European People’s Party, Socialists and Democrats, and much of Renew Europe voting against it. Some MEPs representing rural constituencies may support the clause politically, even if they expect it to be rejected later in negotiations with the Council.

See also  Vatican Prepares for New Conclave Following Pope Francis' Death

Italy’s position remains crucial, as Belgium intends to abstain. Italian backing may be needed to achieve the qualified majority required for approval. Agriculture Minister Francesco Lollobrigida stressed the importance of ensuring imported products comply with EU environmental and labour standards.

Even if von der Leyen signs a provisional agreement with Mercosur leaders, two additional parliamentary votes in early 2026 could still stall the deal. One will address a legal challenge to the deal submitted by 145 leftist lawmakers, who argue the Commission improperly split the agreement to bypass national parliamentary approval. The second will concern the deal’s final ratification, which is expected to be a closer contest.

Parliamentary sources suggest that while party positions provide guidance, many MEPs may vote based on their national governments’ interests. The outcome of these votes will play a decisive role in shaping the EU-Mercosur trade deal and its potential impact on agriculture, trade, and international relations between Europe and South America.

Continue Reading

News

Investigation Underway After Goa Nightclub Fire Kills at Least 25

Published

on

Authorities in the Indian state of Goa have opened an investigation into a nightclub fire that killed at least 25 people, including several tourists, in one of the region’s most popular party districts. Six others were injured in the blaze, which broke out shortly after midnight in Arpora, a nightlife hub about 25 kilometres from the state capital, Panaji.

Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant confirmed the death toll in a statement posted on X, saying the victims included many of the club’s kitchen staff and a small number of visiting tourists. He added that all the injured were in stable condition and receiving medical treatment. Rescue teams recovered all bodies from the site.

Early reports from local police, cited by the Press Trust of India, indicated that a gas cylinder explosion triggered the fire. Witnesses, however, told the agency that the blaze appeared to start on the club’s first floor, where nearly 100 tourists were dancing at the time. As smoke and flames swept through the building, many people ran toward the lower floor, where they became trapped along with staff members.

Sawant said a formal inquiry would determine the exact cause and whether the club complied with fire safety regulations. He pledged strict action against anyone found responsible, writing on X that any negligence uncovered by investigators would be “dealt with firmly”.

Eyewitnesses described scenes of panic as patrons attempted to flee the burning building. “We rushed out of the club only to see that the entire structure was up in flames,” said Fatima Shaikh, who was inside when the fire began.

See also  Russia Accused of Over 2,900 Ceasefire Violations During Easter Truce, Says Zelenskyy

Prime Minister Narendra Modi offered condolences in a message on X, calling the incident “deeply saddening” and wishing the injured a swift recovery.

Local media reported that the club’s location along the Arpora River backwaters posed challenges for emergency crews. A narrow approach road forced fire engines to park about 400 metres from the entrance, slowing their response. Reports also revealed that the building had previously received a demolition notice after officials found it lacked a construction permit. That order was later withdrawn by senior state authorities, according to Arpora councillor Roshan Redkar.

Incidents involving gas cylinders and electrical faults are not unusual in India and often lead to heavy casualties, prompting renewed calls for stronger enforcement of safety standards. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi criticised the tragedy as a “criminal failure of safety and governance” and urged a transparent investigation to establish accountability and prevent future disasters.

The probe into the fire is expected to assess structural safety, emergency exits and compliance with existing regulations as authorities work to piece together how the late-night gathering turned into one of the deadliest incidents in the state in recent years.

Continue Reading

Trending