Tech
Cybersecurity Experts Warn of Risks in AI Caricature Trend
The latest AI-generated caricature trend, in which users upload images to chatbots like ChatGPT, could pose serious security risks, cybersecurity experts have warned. Images uploaded to AI chatbots could be retained for an unknown amount of time and, if in the wrong hands, could lead to impersonation, scams, and fake social media accounts.
The trend invites users to submit photos of themselves, sometimes alongside company logos or job details, and ask AI systems to create colorful caricatures based on what the chatbot “knows” about them. While the results can be entertaining, experts caution that sharing these images can reveal far more than participants realise.
“You are doing fraudsters’ work for them — giving them a visual representation of who you are,” said Bob Long, vice-president at age authentication company Daon. He added that the trend’s wording alone raises concerns, suggesting it could have been “intentionally started by a fraudster looking to make the job easy.”
When an image is uploaded, AI systems process it to extract data such as a person’s emotions, surroundings, or potentially location details, according to cybersecurity consultant Jake Moore. This information may then be stored indefinitely. Long said that uploaded images could also be used to train AI image generators as part of their datasets.
The potential consequences of data breaches are significant. Charlotte Wilson, head of enterprise at Israeli cybersecurity firm Check Point, said that if sensitive images fall into the wrong hands, criminals could use them to create realistic AI deepfakes, run scams, or establish fake social media accounts. “Selfies help criminals move from generic scams to personalised, high-conviction impersonation,” she said.
OpenAI’s privacy policy states that images may be used to improve the model, including training it. ChatGPT clarified that this does not mean every uploaded photo is stored in a public database, but patterns from user content may be used to refine how the system generates images.
Experts emphasise precautions for those wishing to participate. Wilson advised avoiding images that reveal identifying details. “Crop tightly, keep the background plain, and do not include badges, uniforms, work lanyards, location clues or anything that ties you to an employer or a routine,” she said. She also recommended avoiding personal information in prompts, such as job titles, city, or employer.
Moore suggested reviewing privacy settings before participating. OpenAI allows users to opt out of AI training for uploaded content via a privacy portal, and users can also disable text-based training by turning off the “improve the model for everyone” option. Under EU law, users can request the deletion of personal data, though OpenAI may retain some information to address security, fraud, and abuse concerns.
As AI trends continue to gain popularity, experts caution that even seemingly harmless images can carry significant risks. Proper precautions and awareness are essential for users to protect their personal information while engaging with new AI technologies.
Tech
Robotics Firm Says AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Could Carry Weapons by 2027
A U.S. robotics company developing artificial intelligence-powered humanoid robots says weaponised versions of the technology could begin testing as early as next year, following field trials in Ukraine, raising fresh questions about the future of autonomous systems in modern warfare.
Foundation Future Industries, which builds humanoid robots for commercial and military applications, has already tested its Phantom robots in Ukraine in non-combat roles. Chief Executive Officer Sankaet Pathak said the company expects to explore weaponisation after evaluating the results of those pilot programs.
Pathak said public fears are often shaped by science fiction but argued that humanoid robots would not replace existing weapons such as missiles or drones.
“I think we have this psychological reaction, which is like the Terminator, but the reality is not really like that,” he said.
Instead, he believes humanoid robots could be deployed for highly precise military operations where limiting damage to infrastructure and reducing civilian casualties are priorities.
According to Pathak, drones and conventional weapons remain more effective for large-scale attacks, while humanoid robots would be better suited to complex ground missions requiring careful movement through buildings and urban environments.
He added that robots are unlikely to replace drones on the battlefield but could help reduce risks faced by soldiers in increasingly dangerous combat zones.
Currently, there is no international treaty specifically regulating humanoid or autonomous combat robots. Their use falls under existing international humanitarian law, which requires distinction between military targets and civilians during armed conflict.
The issue has drawn increasing attention from the United Nations. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres renewed calls for restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems, describing them as “killer robots” capable of selecting and attacking targets without human judgment. The UN has been negotiating a treaty on lethal autonomous weapons since 2023, with proposals calling for a legally binding agreement by 2026.
Pathak argued that humanoid robots should be treated similarly to other precision-guided military systems already in service, including armed drones and unmanned ground vehicles.
Foundation’s robots rely on artificial intelligence built around so-called world models. Unlike large language models that predict text, these systems learn from video, simulations and spatial information to understand physical environments and predict how objects and people move over time.
The company believes these models are essential for creating robots capable of safely navigating complex surroundings.
While concerns persist about advanced AI becoming uncontrollable, Pathak said the greater short-term threat comes from criminals or extremist groups misusing publicly available AI tools for cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns or modifying commercial drones for attacks.
He believes scenarios involving AI independently rewriting its own objectives and improving itself remain several major technological breakthroughs away.
Beyond combat, Foundation sees immediate military uses for its humanoid robots in logistics, reconnaissance and building inspections. Those capabilities have already been evaluated in Ukraine, helping shape the development of the company’s next-generation Phantom 2 robot.
The upgraded model is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, offering waterproof and dustproof protection, an increased payload capacity of around 80 kilograms and greater resistance to impacts.
Foundation currently leases Phantom robots to commercial customers for about $100,000 annually per unit, while military buyers purchase the machines at similar prices. Its investors include Eric Trump, payment company Stripe and venture capital firm Define.
Tech
AI-Powered Parapharmacy in Lisbon Lets Customers Shop Without Staff or Checkout Lines
Tech
Global Rights Groups Call for AI Companies to Be Held Responsible for Children’s Safety
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
