Connect with us

Health

WHO Urges Continued Funding for PEPFAR as US Freezes Foreign Aid

Published

on

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for continued funding of global HIV programmes following the recent decision by US President Donald Trump to freeze foreign aid, a move that threatens treatment and testing for millions worldwide.

The funding suspension puts at risk access to HIV diagnostics, medicines, and treatment in low- and middle-income countries, according to WHO officials. The organisation warned that halting these programmes could lead to severe health consequences, particularly in regions heavily impacted by HIV/AIDS.

Dire Consequences of Funding Cuts

“A funding halt for HIV programmes can put people living with HIV at immediate increased risk of illness and death and undermine efforts to prevent transmission in communities and countries,” the WHO said in a statement.

Health officials fear that an extended pause on foreign assistance could undo decades of progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, potentially returning the world to conditions seen in the 1980s and 1990s when millions died annually due to lack of treatment.

As of 2023, nearly 39.9 million people worldwide were living with HIV, with two-thirds residing in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite a significant reduction in AIDS-related deaths—from 2.1 million in 2004 to 630,000 in 2023—the disease remains a leading global health crisis.

Impact on PEPFAR and Global HIV Efforts

The most affected programme by the funding freeze is the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which has been instrumental in saving more than 26 million lives since its launch in 2003 under then-President George W. Bush.

In 2024, PEPFAR provided antiviral HIV treatment to 20.6 million people across 55 countries. The programme also initiated 2.5 million individuals on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a preventive measure against HIV infection, and facilitated testing for 83.8 million people.

See also  Benefits of Human Growth Hormones and Key Considerations for Safe Use

Beyond direct patient care, PEPFAR supports 342,000 health workers worldwide whose jobs are now in jeopardy due to the funding suspension. The freeze also affects additional US-backed foreign aid initiatives that collectively provide HIV treatment to 30 million people.

US Pullback from Global Health Leadership

President Trump’s decision to freeze foreign aid for health initiatives marks another step in scaling back US global health commitments. In addition to pausing PEPFAR funding, he has initiated the process of withdrawing the US from the WHO and reinstated the Mexico City Policy, which restricts US funding to foreign organisations that provide abortion-related services or information.

Trump has cited dissatisfaction with the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns over the disproportionate US financial contributions to the organisation as reasons for these decisions.

Calls for Exemptions and Humanitarian Waivers

WHO officials have been working with nations benefiting from PEPFAR to develop long-term strategies for reducing dependency on US aid by 2030. However, the abrupt funding halt threatens to derail these efforts, putting millions of lives at risk, according to the organisation.

The WHO is advocating for exemptions to allow the continued delivery of essential HIV treatment and care. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly granted a humanitarian waiver to maintain critical health services impacted by the freeze. According to The Washington Post, the waiver covers “core lifesaving medicine, medical services, food, shelter, and subsistence assistance.”

However, it remains unclear whether the exemption will apply to PEPFAR, leaving the future of millions of HIV patients in uncertainty. Global health advocates continue to urge the US government to reinstate funding for these essential programmes to prevent a major health crisis.

Health

Greenland Responds to US Claims, Emphasizes Need for Foreign Healthcare Staff

Published

on

Greenland’s government has highlighted the need to strengthen its health system and recruit foreign healthcare professionals following a statement from US President Donald Trump suggesting patients in the territory are not receiving adequate care. On 22 February, Trump posted on Truth Social that he planned to send a hospital ship to Greenland “to take care of the many people who are sick and not being taken care of there.”

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen rejected the offer, stressing that the country provides free healthcare for all residents, a service the United States cannot replicate. Yet Trump’s comments reflect ongoing challenges in staffing Greenland’s healthcare sector.

The territory has long struggled to recruit and retain medical professionals. In response, the government has introduced measures to ease residence permits for foreign healthcare workers. Anna Wangenheim, Minister of Health and Persons with Disabilities, stated on Facebook that Greenland is actively working to strengthen its healthcare system and is seeking more international professionals. She added that help from any country, including the United States, would be welcome if healthcare workers respect local patients, language, and culture.

Greenland, home to more than 56,000 people as of January 2026, is the world’s least densely populated territory. Around 20,000 live in the capital, Nuuk, while the rest reside in scattered towns and settlements, presenting unique logistical challenges for healthcare delivery.

The territory’s health burden remains high. In 2023, Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) per 100,000 residents stood at 38,715, higher than Denmark’s 30,931 and the European average of 36,863. About 1.5% of the population had cancer and nearly 19% suffered from mental health disorders, both above EU averages. Life expectancy also lags behind Europe, with newborn boys expected to live 69.3 years and girls 73.9 years, compared with the European average of 81.7 years.

See also  Georgia Woman Sues Fertility Clinic After Embryo Mix-Up Leads to Custody Loss

Greenland’s health system operates across 70 locations with roughly 120 medical positions—only half of which are permanent—and 300 nursing roles, two-thirds permanent. Services are divided into five regions, each served by a regional hospital, with Queen Ingrid’s Hospital in Nuuk acting as both a regional and national facility. More advanced procedures, such as radiotherapy or invasive cardiology, require travel to Denmark.

Telemedicine has helped bridge geographic gaps. Hansen, a medical advisor at Greenland’s Department of Health, noted that skin diseases can now be diagnosed remotely with support from Denmark. In 2023, the territory launched the app Puisa to provide secure video consultations for residents in remote areas, reducing the need for long travel.

While Greenland’s healthcare system covers basic medical needs, officials acknowledge that infrastructure and staffing limits restrict the delivery of specialized treatments locally. The government continues to seek international staff to enhance services and meet the challenges of a dispersed population.

Continue Reading

Health

Eli Lilly’s Oral Pill Shows Strong Weight Loss Results in Clinical Trials

Published

on

Eli Lilly’s new oral pill, orforglipron, has demonstrated up to 8% weight loss in clinical trials, outperforming existing oral semaglutide alternatives. The results signal growing competition in the weight-loss drug market, where demand for convenient and effective treatments continues to rise.

The trial, published in The Lancet, involved more than 1,600 participants with type 2 diabetes across over 130 research centres in five countries. Participants were assigned to different doses of orforglipron, ranging from 12mg to 36mg, or equivalent doses of oral semaglutide for one year.

Results showed that roughly 60% of those taking orforglipron lost at least 5% of their body weight, compared with 40% of participants on semaglutide. Between 28% and 44% of patients on orforglipron lost 10% or more, while only 13% to 21% of those on semaglutide reached similar reductions. Participants also experienced improved blood sugar control, with orforglipron lowering glucose levels more effectively than its competitor.

Experts welcomed the results but urged caution. Naveed Sattar, professor of cardiometabolic medicine at the University of Glasgow, said oral medications that help patients lose weight and maintain it are vital, noting that excess weight is a key driver of type 2 diabetes and associated cardiovascular risks. Marie Spreckley, a weight management researcher at Cambridge University, highlighted that while the trial showed benefits, side effects and long-term safety remain important considerations.

Adverse effects were more common among orforglipron users. Approximately 9-10% of participants stopped the treatment due to gastrointestinal issues, compared with about 5% of those on semaglutide. Spreckley noted that these effects could affect real-world tolerability outside the trial environment and called for further research on long-term outcomes, including cardiovascular health and sustained effectiveness.

See also  Trump Administration Launches Controversial Health Data-Sharing Initiative

Orforglipron is designed as a daily pill that does not require food or water restrictions, offering a more convenient alternative to injectable treatments such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro. Eli Lilly, which also markets Zepbound and Mounjaro, is positioning orforglipron as a competitor to Novo Nordisk, the current provider of the only approved oral GLP-1 pill.

The pill is under review by the US Food and Drug Administration. If approved, Eli Lilly said US patients with obesity could access the drug starting at $149 (€125.92) for the lowest dose, with higher doses priced up to $399 (€337) if insurance does not cover the cost.

As pharmaceutical companies race to make weight-loss treatments more accessible, orforglipron’s strong results highlight the potential of oral GLP-1 therapies to reshape the market, even as questions about side effects and long-term safety remain.

Continue Reading

Health

Vasectomy Gains Popularity Among Polish Men as Fertility Rates Fall

Published

on

In Poland, vasectomy is emerging as a more popular method of permanent contraception among men, while female tubal ligation remains illegal on request. The trend comes amid growing concern over the country’s declining fertility rates and shifting attitudes toward family planning.

The State of the Young 2025 report found that 15 percent of adults born between 1995 and 2006 have no children and do not intend to have any. While permanent contraception options for men are increasingly sought, women in Poland have no equivalent choice: tubal ligation is prohibited except for strict medical reasons, and performing it on request can carry prison sentences of three to 20 years under Article 156-1 of the Penal Code.

Statistics on vasectomy in Poland are limited, as most procedures are carried out privately. It is estimated that around 5,000 vasectomies take place annually, with clinics advertising the services online and on roadside billboards. Mateusz Siwik, owner of a Warsaw clinic, told Euronews Health that interest in the procedure has been steadily growing, with year-on-year increases of around 15 percent. He said patients are socially diverse but often men in stable relationships with two or more children who have consciously decided to end family expansion.

One example is Kamil Pawelski, a psychologist and influencer who underwent vasectomy in 2020 after the birth of his second child. Pawelski said the decision was motivated by concern for his wife’s health and their mutual decision not to have more children. He noted that public reactions were mixed, with more criticism coming from men than women. “I think this is a very masculine decision,” he said, stressing that the procedure is only suitable for those certain about not having future children.

See also  Measles Outbreaks Surge Across Europe, Romania Hit Hardest

The restriction on female sterilisation has contributed to medical tourism, with Poles travelling to Germany, Czechia, and Slovakia for tubal ligation. Rafał Zadykowicz, an obstetrics and gynaecology specialist, said foreign gynaecologists are often surprised by the strict legal limits in Poland, where access is limited to medical necessity.

Vasectomy is increasingly preferred across Europe and North America due to its relative simplicity and low invasiveness. France has seen vasectomies rise from 1,940 in 2010 to over 30,000 in 2022, especially among men under 40. In Canada, 22 percent of women rely on their partner’s vasectomy, while rates in the UK, New Zealand, and South Korea range from 17 to 21 percent. In contrast, Italy sees only around 1 percent of men undergoing the procedure. No official figures exist for Poland, but interest is clearly rising.

Poland faces some of the lowest fertility rates globally. The total fertility rate fell to an estimated 1.10 children per woman in 2025, leaving the population at 37.3 million. Within the OECD, Poland ranks third from last, ahead of only Chile and South Korea. Social policy programmes offering financial support for children have been in place since 2016, but debates continue over why many young adults choose not to have children despite the incentives.

Continue Reading

Trending