Connect with us

Business

Trump warns US could be left ‘defenceless’ if Supreme Court overturns global tariffs

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has cautioned that the United States could be left “defenceless” and “reduced to almost Third World status” if the Supreme Court overturns his sweeping global tariffs. The warning came as justices appeared sceptical during oral arguments on Wednesday about his claims of near-unlimited authority to impose tariffs.

Despite the court’s doubts, trade experts say Trump would still have multiple legal tools to continue taxing imports even if his emergency powers are curtailed. “It’s hard to see any pathway here where tariffs end,” said Kathleen Claussen, a trade law professor at Georgetown University. “He could rebuild the tariff landscape using other authorities.”

Tariffs have become a key element of Trump’s foreign and economic policy in his second term. Since returning to the White House, he has imposed double-digit “reciprocal” tariffs on most countries, declaring America’s trade deficits a national emergency. The average US tariff now stands at 17.9%, up from 2.5% in January, according to Yale University’s Budget Lab — the highest level since 1934.

At the hearing, Neal Katyal, representing small businesses challenging the tariffs, argued that Trump’s use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) went far beyond what Congress intended. He noted that Congress had already delegated tariff powers through other, more limited laws. “Congress knows exactly how to delegate its tariff powers,” Katyal said.

Even if the Supreme Court restricts his use of emergency powers, Trump could turn to several other laws to keep tariffs in place. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the United States to impose duties on countries engaged in “unjustifiable” or “unreasonable” trade practices. Trump has used it extensively against China, including tariffs on a wide range of goods during his first term. These measures can last four years and be renewed indefinitely.

See also  Plug-in Hybrids Drive China's 2024 EV Growth as Petrol Vehicle Sales Plunge

Another option is Section 122 of the same act, which lets the president impose tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days in response to trade imbalances. Though never used before, this provision requires no investigation before implementation.

Trump has also relied heavily on Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows tariffs on imports deemed a threat to national security. Using this authority, he has imposed duties on steel, aluminium, and even furniture, a move that critics argue stretches the definition of “security.” Courts are generally reluctant to question presidential determinations in this area, giving the White House considerable latitude.

Some advisers have floated an even older tool: Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, part of the infamous Smoot-Hawley legislation that deepened the Great Depression. The clause permits tariffs of up to 50% against countries that discriminate against US businesses. Though it has never been used, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently described it as a potential “Plan B” should the Supreme Court strike down Trump’s emergency tariffs.

“To be the first president ever to use it could have some cachet,” said John Veroneau, a former US trade official. For now, Trump’s message to the court — and to trading partners — is clear: even if one door closes, he intends to keep the tariff war alive.

Business

ECB Holds Interest Rates as Energy Prices Surge Amid Middle East Tensions

Published

on

The European Central Bank (ECB) kept its key policy rates on hold on Thursday, as fresh spikes in oil and gas prices threaten to derail recent progress in reducing inflation.

The bank concluded its March meeting without altering borrowing costs, leaving the deposit facility rate at 2%. Other main policy rates, including the main refinancing operations (MRO) rate and the marginal lending facility rate, remain at 2.15% and 2.4% respectively. The move had been widely anticipated by analysts.

In its statement, the ECB warned that the ongoing war in the Middle East has added significant uncertainty, creating upward risks for inflation while posing downside risks for economic growth. The central bank noted that the conflict in Iran “will have a material impact on near-term inflation through higher energy prices,” and said its medium-term effects will depend on the conflict’s duration and intensity, as well as the broader impact on consumer prices and the European economy.

Thursday’s decision came amid a dramatic spike in energy costs. European natural gas futures jumped over 30% to €74 per megawatt hour, the highest level in more than three years. Oil prices also surged, with Brent crude climbing above $119 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) exceeding $96, following Iranian attacks on key energy facilities in the Middle East. Analysts warn that if elevated energy costs persist for months, they could feed into wider price pressures and delay any rate cuts until well into 2027.

The ECB’s hold follows a similar decision in February, when the bank left rates unchanged and reaffirmed its commitment to bringing inflation back to its 2% medium-term target. Christine Lagarde, president of the ECB, emphasized the delicate balance policymakers face between supporting economic growth and containing inflationary pressures.

See also  Global Luxury Sector Faces New Blow as US-China Trade War Escalates

Markets responded cautiously to the announcement. Major European stock indices opened lower as investors weighed the energy shock against the ECB’s expected move. The euro edged slightly higher in early trading, while government bond yields rose modestly.

For households and businesses across the 21-country eurozone, the decision means that mortgage and loan rates linked to ECB policy will remain steady for now. However, money-market contracts have already adjusted to reflect the potential for one or two rate hikes later this year, rather than the cuts that had been forecast just weeks ago.

Economists noted that the ECB’s message signals continued vigilance. Any prolonged surge in oil and gas prices could force the central bank to maintain tight monetary conditions longer than anticipated, leaving both consumers and businesses to navigate higher financing costs while energy bills continue to rise.

The ECB’s action underscores the fragility of the eurozone recovery in the face of geopolitical shocks, highlighting the challenge of managing inflation while safeguarding economic growth.

Continue Reading

Business

Ships Continue Passing Through Strait of Hormuz Despite Ongoing Conflict

Published

on

Dozens of ships are still navigating the Strait of Hormuz as Iran maintains oil exports despite continued attacks on one of the world’s most critical trade routes.

Around 90 vessels, including oil tankers, have crossed the strait since the conflict began earlier this month, according to maritime data. This comes even as most commercial traffic has been disrupted and nearly 20 ships have reportedly been targeted in the area. The strait, which normally carries about one-fifth of global oil supply, has seen a sharp drop in overall movement compared to pre-conflict levels.

Despite the risks, Iran has continued exporting oil, shipping more than 16 million barrels since the start of March, according to analytics firm Kpler. Much of this trade is believed to involve so-called “dark” shipping practices, where vessels avoid tracking systems to bypass sanctions and scrutiny. Analysts say many of these ships are linked to Iranian networks, while others have connections to countries such as China and Greece.

More recently, vessels tied to India and Pakistan have also passed through the strait following diplomatic engagement. Maritime data shows that the Pakistan-flagged tanker Karachi and India-linked gas carriers Shivalik and Nanda Devi successfully completed their journeys through the route in mid-March. Indian officials indicated that discussions with Tehran helped secure safe passage for the ships.

Experts say these crossings suggest the strait is not entirely closed but operating under selective conditions. Richard Meade, editor-in-chief of Lloyd’s List, said some vessels appear to be transiting with a degree of diplomatic coordination, often staying close to Iranian waters. There are also indications that certain ships have identified themselves as linked to China or staffed by Chinese crews, likely to reduce the risk of being targeted.

See also  Economists Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt Awarded 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics for Work on Innovation-Driven Growth

Oil markets remain highly sensitive to developments in the region. Prices have risen more than 40 per cent since the conflict began, briefly pushing Brent crude oil above $100 per barrel. The surge has prompted calls from Donald Trump for allied nations to help secure the waterway and restore stability to global energy supplies.

Iran has warned that it may block shipments destined for the United States, Israel and their allies, while allowing limited flows to continue. US officials have indicated that some Iranian exports are being tolerated to prevent further disruption to global markets.

Analysts say the current situation reflects a controlled but fragile balance, where the strait remains partially operational. While limited traffic continues, the risk of escalation remains high, and any further disruption could have significant consequences for global energy supply and prices.

Continue Reading

Business

Iran Raises Minimum Wage by 60% Amid Inflation and Conflict Pressures

Published

on

Authorities in Iran have announced a 60 percent increase in the national minimum wage as the country faces mounting economic strain driven by conflict and soaring inflation.

Labour Minister Ahmad Meydari confirmed the decision on Monday, saying the monthly minimum wage will rise from 103 million rials to 166 million rials. The increase is intended to ease the burden on workers struggling with rapidly rising living costs.

The move comes against a backdrop of economic hardship and recent unrest. Protests earlier in 2026, linked largely to inflation and declining living standards, were met with a crackdown by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Independent sources reported a high number of casualties during the unrest.

Iran’s leadership, under Ali Khamenei, has faced growing pressure from labour groups to improve wages as the national currency weakens and the cost of essential goods rises sharply. With the rial trading at extremely low levels against the US dollar, many households have struggled to afford basic necessities.

The wage adjustment will take effect on March 20, marking the start of the Persian New Year. Authorities have also announced increases in family and child allowances as part of a broader effort to support households.

Despite the significant rise, analysts and labour representatives say the new wage level remains far below what is needed to cover basic expenses. Estimates suggest a typical family requires more than 580 million rials per month for essential goods, while labour groups had pushed for a higher threshold.

Inflation remains a major concern. Official figures indicate consumer prices rose by 44.6 percent in 2025, while other reports point to even higher levels. Food prices have been particularly affected, with sharp increases in staples such as bread, meat and cooking oil. In some cases, prices have more than doubled over the past year.

See also  Signa Holdings Sells Selfridges Group Shares to Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund

Economic pressures have intensified due to ongoing conflict involving Israel and the United States, along with continued sanctions that have disrupted supply chains and weakened the currency further.

Over the past decade, wages in Iran have lost much of their purchasing power. Many families have been forced to take on additional work or sell assets to cope with rising costs. Reports indicate that dietary patterns have shifted, with lower-income households reducing consumption of protein-rich foods in favour of cheaper alternatives.

The government’s latest decision is seen as a short-term measure to provide relief, though economists warn that without broader reforms to address inflation and currency instability, the benefits of the wage increase may be limited.

Continue Reading

Trending