Business
Trump Administration Presses Court to Allow Removal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook
The Trump administration on Sunday renewed its request for a federal appeals court to approve the removal of Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, in an extraordinary challenge to the central bank’s independence just days before a key interest rate decision.
The White House submitted its latest filing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia minutes before a 3 p.m. deadline, arguing that Cook’s legal defense against her dismissal lacked merit. “The public and the executive share an interest in ensuring the integrity of the Federal Reserve,” the administration’s lawyers wrote. “That requires respecting the president’s statutory authority to remove governors ‘for cause’ when such cause arises.”
The case marks the first time in the Fed’s 112-year history that a sitting president has attempted to fire a governor. Cook, appointed in 2022 and the first Black woman to serve on the board, sued to block her removal. A federal judge last week sided with her, ruling that the president’s action was unlawful and ordering her reinstated. The administration immediately appealed, seeking an emergency ruling before the Fed convenes this week to decide whether to lower its benchmark interest rate — a move most economists expect.
At the heart of the dispute are allegations of mortgage misrepresentation. Bill Pulte, a Trump appointee to the agency overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, accused Cook of improperly identifying two different homes as her “primary residence” in loan documents — a condominium in Atlanta and a property in Ann Arbor, Michigan, both purchased in 2021. Pulte submitted a referral to the Justice Department, which has opened an inquiry.
Relying on those allegations, Trump moved to dismiss Cook “for cause,” citing statutory authority to remove Fed governors under certain circumstances. But Cook has insisted the claims are unfounded. Loan records reviewed by The Associated Press describe the Atlanta property as a “vacation home” on one estimate and as a “second home” in a separate security clearance form. Those details, her lawyers argue, undermine the administration’s case that she engaged in fraud.
Cook’s legal team also warned that allowing the White House to dismiss a governor without clear cause would upend the central bank’s independence and risk politicizing monetary policy. In their filing on Saturday, they argued that the attempt to remove her “strikes at the core of the Fed’s ability to operate without partisan interference.”
The case has drawn intense attention from economists, lawmakers, and financial markets. The outcome could set a precedent for presidential influence over the central bank at a time when it faces critical decisions on inflation, growth, and financial stability.
For now, the appeals court must decide whether Cook can remain in her post while the legal battle continues. Its ruling could come within days, potentially reshaping the landscape of central bank independence ahead of the Fed’s policy meeting.
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement1 year agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
