Connect with us

Business

Ships Continue Passing Through Strait of Hormuz Despite Ongoing Conflict

Published

on

Dozens of ships are still navigating the Strait of Hormuz as Iran maintains oil exports despite continued attacks on one of the world’s most critical trade routes.

Around 90 vessels, including oil tankers, have crossed the strait since the conflict began earlier this month, according to maritime data. This comes even as most commercial traffic has been disrupted and nearly 20 ships have reportedly been targeted in the area. The strait, which normally carries about one-fifth of global oil supply, has seen a sharp drop in overall movement compared to pre-conflict levels.

Despite the risks, Iran has continued exporting oil, shipping more than 16 million barrels since the start of March, according to analytics firm Kpler. Much of this trade is believed to involve so-called “dark” shipping practices, where vessels avoid tracking systems to bypass sanctions and scrutiny. Analysts say many of these ships are linked to Iranian networks, while others have connections to countries such as China and Greece.

More recently, vessels tied to India and Pakistan have also passed through the strait following diplomatic engagement. Maritime data shows that the Pakistan-flagged tanker Karachi and India-linked gas carriers Shivalik and Nanda Devi successfully completed their journeys through the route in mid-March. Indian officials indicated that discussions with Tehran helped secure safe passage for the ships.

Experts say these crossings suggest the strait is not entirely closed but operating under selective conditions. Richard Meade, editor-in-chief of Lloyd’s List, said some vessels appear to be transiting with a degree of diplomatic coordination, often staying close to Iranian waters. There are also indications that certain ships have identified themselves as linked to China or staffed by Chinese crews, likely to reduce the risk of being targeted.

See also  Corruption in Western Europe Remains Under the Radar Despite Public Perception

Oil markets remain highly sensitive to developments in the region. Prices have risen more than 40 per cent since the conflict began, briefly pushing Brent crude oil above $100 per barrel. The surge has prompted calls from Donald Trump for allied nations to help secure the waterway and restore stability to global energy supplies.

Iran has warned that it may block shipments destined for the United States, Israel and their allies, while allowing limited flows to continue. US officials have indicated that some Iranian exports are being tolerated to prevent further disruption to global markets.

Analysts say the current situation reflects a controlled but fragile balance, where the strait remains partially operational. While limited traffic continues, the risk of escalation remains high, and any further disruption could have significant consequences for global energy supply and prices.

Business

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady as Middle East Conflict Clouds Economic Outlook

Published

on

The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged on Wednesday, marking the third consecutive meeting without a move as policymakers weigh rising inflation and growing uncertainty linked to the conflict in the Middle East.

The decision leaves the federal funds rate in a target range of 3.50% to 3.75%. While widely expected, the outcome revealed significant divisions within the central bank’s policy-setting committee, underscoring the difficult balancing act facing officials.

In its post-meeting statement, the Fed said recent developments in the Middle East had added to uncertainty surrounding the US economic outlook. It noted that inflation remains above target, partly due to higher global energy prices following renewed tensions in the region.

Despite holding rates steady, the central bank signalled that cuts remain possible later this year if inflation eases and economic conditions weaken. Still, the decision was far from unanimous. Three policymakers opposed language suggesting future rate cuts, while one official, Stephen Miran, argued for an immediate reduction.

The dissent marked the highest level of disagreement within the Federal Open Market Committee since 1992, highlighting a widening debate over how best to respond to slowing growth and persistent price pressures.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who is expected to step down as chair in May, said the central bank must remain cautious as it navigates a complex economic environment. Inflation has risen to 3.3%, well above the Fed’s 2% target, while recent data show the labour market is losing momentum.

Although unemployment remains relatively low at 4.3%, hiring has slowed considerably in recent months. Policymakers are trying to prevent inflation from becoming entrenched while avoiding unnecessary damage to economic growth.

See also  Beijing Warns of Retaliation Over US-Led Trade Deals as Tensions Escalate

Powell also indicated that he intends to remain on the Fed’s Board of Governors after his term as chair ends, potentially until early 2028. He cited concerns about maintaining institutional stability amid what he described as mounting political pressure on the central bank.

His decision would temporarily prevent President Donald Trump from appointing another governor immediately, even as Trump’s nominee to succeed Powell as chair, Kevin Warsh, moves closer to confirmation.

Warsh has advocated broad changes to the Fed’s policymaking framework and has expressed support for lower interest rates. However, with inflation still elevated, analysts say any shift toward easier monetary policy may be gradual.

The Fed’s next moves will likely depend on how inflation, employment and energy markets evolve in the coming months. For now, policymakers appear determined to proceed carefully as geopolitical risks and domestic economic challenges continue to shape the outlook.

Continue Reading

Business

Debate Grows in Germany Over Using Gold Reserves to Ease Economic Pressures

Published

on

Germany’s vast gold reserves have become the focus of renewed political and economic debate, as calls grow for part of the stockpile to be used to support households, businesses and public investment.

The German Bundesbank holds 3,350 tonnes of gold, making it the world’s second-largest national reserve after the United States. With gold prices recently rising above $4,700 per troy ounce, the value of Germany’s holdings has climbed to nearly €440 billion.

Marcel Fratzscher, president of the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), has suggested that some of this reserve could be put to practical use. He described the gold stockpile as a valuable resource in times of economic strain and argued that selling a portion could help fund investments in infrastructure and education, while also easing financial pressure on consumers and businesses.

The proposal comes as Germany continues to grapple with rising living costs. Consumer prices remain elevated, with sectors such as transport seeing particularly sharp increases. Official figures show that the Motorists’ Index, which tracks driving-related expenses, was 6.7% higher in March than a year earlier.

Germany’s gold reserves are not all held domestically. About one-third, or 1,236 tonnes, is stored at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, while another 404 tonnes is held in London. The remainder is kept in Frankfurt. All reserves remain under the ownership and management of the Bundesbank.

The overseas storage arrangement dates back to the post-war Bretton Woods era, when Germany’s trade surpluses were converted into gold. Although the Bundesbank repatriated 374 tonnes from Paris in 2017, most of its foreign-held gold remains in New York.

See also  European Markets Tumble Amid Global Turmoil and Recession Fears

That has prompted fresh political scrutiny. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups have questioned whether Germany should continue to keep such a large share of its reserves abroad, particularly in the United States.

The Alternative for Germany party has called for the full repatriation of the country’s gold, while also suggesting it could serve as backing for a future national currency. The proposal has been widely rejected by mainstream parties, which have defended both the security of the reserves and Germany’s commitment to the euro.

Others have focused less on location and more on whether some of the gold should be sold. Supporters of that view argue that the reserves could be used more actively during periods of economic difficulty.

The Bundesbank, however, has consistently opposed any sale. It regards gold as a cornerstone of financial stability and a long-term safeguard for confidence in Germany’s monetary system.

While no immediate policy change appears likely, the discussion reflects growing pressure on policymakers to consider every available option as Europe’s largest economy faces mounting economic challenges.

Continue Reading

Business

European Fuel Prices Remain Elevated After Iran Conflict Despite Ceasefire

Published

on

Fuel prices across Europe remain significantly higher than before the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, even after a ceasefire helped ease some of the market pressure.

Petrol and diesel costs surged in the weeks following the military action launched on 28 February, when the United States and Israel carried out strikes against Iranian targets. Iran responded with retaliatory attacks across the region, stoking fears of supply disruptions in global energy markets. Although Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire on 8 April, fuel prices have yet to return to pre-crisis levels.

Data from the European Commission’s Weekly Oil Bulletin show that the average price of petrol across the European Union rose from €1.64 per litre on 23 February to €1.83 by 20 April, an increase of 12%.

Several countries recorded much steeper rises. Belgium, Czechia and Bulgaria each saw petrol prices jump by 22%. Among Europe’s largest economies, France posted the sharpest increase at 18%, followed by Germany at 15%. Italy experienced a 7% rise, while Spain saw a more modest 3% increase. Petrol prices in Malta remained unchanged.

Diesel prices climbed even faster. Across the EU, the average price of diesel rose from €1.59 to €2.01 per litre over the same period, marking a 26% increase. That is more than double the rise recorded for petrol.

Bulgaria experienced the largest diesel increase at 43%. France followed closely with a 36% rise, while Estonia and Belgium recorded increases of 35% and 33%, respectively. Spain’s diesel prices rose by 27%, exceeding the EU average, while Germany and Italy saw increases of 23% and 24%.

See also  Beijing Warns of Retaliation Over US-Led Trade Deals as Tensions Escalate

Despite the recent pullback, fuel prices remain high in many countries. The Netherlands currently has the highest petrol price in Europe at €2.28 per litre, followed by Denmark at €2.22. Germany, Greece and France all report petrol prices above €2 per litre.

For diesel, the Netherlands also tops the list at €2.30 per litre. Finland, France, Denmark and Belgium are close behind, all above €2.19.

At the other end of the scale, Malta has the lowest fuel prices in Europe. Petrol there costs €1.34 per litre, while diesel stands at just €1.21. Poland and Bulgaria also rank among the least expensive markets.

Fuel prices had already begun climbing before the strikes, but accelerated sharply in March and early April. Diesel briefly exceeded €2.10 per litre before retreating after the ceasefire announcement.

The latest price surge highlights Europe’s continued vulnerability to geopolitical shocks in energy-producing regions. With taxes accounting for a substantial share of pump prices and conventional vehicles still dominating European roads, households and businesses remain exposed to swings in global oil markets.

Continue Reading

Trending