Connect with us

Business

Economic Uncertainty Over US Tariffs Threatens Eurozone and UK Growth

Published

on

Uncertainty surrounding US trade tariffs is set to cost the eurozone and UK economies billions over the next two years, according to a recent report by S&P Global. The potential economic fallout cannot be fully offset by increased defence spending, despite upcoming fiscal stimulus measures in Europe.

Eurozone Growth Downgraded Amid Trade Concerns

S&P Global’s latest economic forecast projects that the eurozone economy, valued at €14.6 trillion, will contract by 0.4% of GDP cumulatively in 2025 and 2026 due to trade-related uncertainty. Prior to the recent announcement of 25% tariffs on US car imports, the organization had already downgraded its eurozone growth expectations for 2025 from 1.2% to 0.9%.

Sylvain Broyer, Chief Economist for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) at S&P Global, emphasized that “uncertainty itself is likely to pose a greater risk to the European economy than the tariffs alone.”

While US tariffs could weaken economic recovery, there are some positive indicators. Fiscal stimulus measures in Germany and the broader EU could help drive eurozone GDP growth to 1.4% in 2026. Additionally, confidence in the region is improving due to falling inflation and interest rates, which are strengthening the labour market.

Potential Economic Impact of Tariffs

S&P Global considered multiple scenarios regarding the impact of US tariffs on the eurozone economy. In the worst-case scenario, where all EU exports to the US face a 25% tariff, eurozone GDP growth could be limited to 0.5% in 2025 and 1.2% in 2026.

Germany, heavily reliant on US car exports, would be particularly affected. Broyer noted that Germany’s exposure to US car markets is 1.5 times the European average, and tariffs could lower its economic output by 0.1% in 2025.

See also  UK Economy Stagnates in Q3 Amid Growing Recession Fears

Despite these challenges, EU defence spending could provide some economic support. European governments are expected to increase defence budgets by 1% of GDP from 2026 onward, potentially boosting eurozone GDP by 0.1% in 2026, 0.2% in 2027, and 0.3% in 2028.

European Central Bank’s Expected Response

S&P Global anticipates that the European Central Bank (ECB) will cut interest rates once more in 2025, reducing the rate to 2.25% by mid-year. However, it expects the ECB to start raising rates again in the second half of 2026, with two hikes bringing the deposit facility rate to 2.75% by year-end.

Broyer warned that additional risks to the forecast include continued trade uncertainty, potential failures in executing fiscal plans, and economic slowdowns in the US due to rising import costs. However, stronger-than-expected fiscal stimulus could improve confidence and support growth.

UK Growth Forecast Cut Nearly in Half

The UK is also facing economic headwinds. Before the car tariff announcement, S&P Global had already lowered its UK growth forecast for 2025 from 1.5% to 0.8%, citing persistent inflation, weak export volumes, and restrictive monetary policy.

Marion Amiot, Chief UK Economist at S&P Global Ratings, highlighted that if the UK cannot avoid the newly imposed 25% tariffs on car exports to the US, it could face an additional 0.2% hit to GDP. “Car exports to the US are the largest source of bilateral goods trade surplus for the UK,” Amiot noted.

The UK’s export sector is struggling due to weak demand in Europe and China, as well as the strong value of the British pound. High energy and labour costs are also limiting competitiveness. “Energy prices are still twice as high today as they were before the energy crisis, so businesses have a lot to absorb,” Amiot explained.

See also  Oil Prices Rise, Global Markets Slide Amid Escalating Iran-Israel Tensions

The Bank of England’s Dilemma

The Bank of England (BoE) faces a challenging economic landscape. While businesses and investors are eager for interest rate cuts, inflation remains a key concern. In its latest meeting, the BoE kept its benchmark interest rate at 4.5%, despite inflation dropping to 2.8% in February.

S&P Global predicts that the BoE will lower rates to 4% by the third quarter of 2025, although it now expects one fewer rate cut than previously forecast. Inflationary pressures are likely to remain a constraint on monetary policy decisions.

Looking ahead, UK economic growth is expected to accelerate in 2026, with S&P Global projecting a 1.6% GDP increase. “Things are looking up for 2026, with regional growth picking up, interest rates cut by another 50 basis points, and inflation edging back to 2.5%,” the report concluded.

As trade tensions and policy uncertainty continue to shape economic conditions, both the eurozone and the UK must navigate a complex environment, balancing fiscal stimulus with monetary policy adjustments to maintain stability and growth.

Business

FII Summit in Rome Calls for Faster Reforms to Boost Europe’s Investment Appeal

Published

on

The discussions highlighted what participants described as a critical opportunity for Europe to reinforce its strategic autonomy and position itself as a leading destination for global investment. However, speakers warned that without faster reforms and reduced administrative barriers, the region risks falling behind the United States and rapidly advancing Asian economies.

Unlike the recent G7 discussions, which focused heavily on geopolitical tensions and security issues, the Rome summit placed economic transformation at the centre of attention. The FII Priority Europe event brought together policymakers and investors to examine how the continent can regain momentum and secure funding for industrial and technological development.

Richard Attias, chairman of the executive committee of the FII Institute, told delegates that Europe retains strong fundamentals, including skilled labour, innovation capacity and established industrial infrastructure. However, he said investors increasingly demand predictability, speed and clarity in decision-making processes.

Attias called for streamlined regulations and simplified administrative systems to improve capital flows into key sectors such as artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure, renewable energy and advanced manufacturing. He also noted that Europe is competing not only with the United States but also with emerging economies that are rapidly adjusting their regulatory frameworks to attract investment.

He stressed that the challenge lies in maintaining European standards while ensuring that regulatory systems do not slow economic progress. According to him, global capital is moving quickly, and Europe must adapt if it wants to remain a leading investment destination.

See also  CVC Capital Partners Reportedly Seeking Buyer for Majority Stake in Genetic Group

The issue of long-term investment in Europe was also addressed by Yasir O. Al Rumayyan, governor of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and chairman of energy giant Aramco. He said Europe stands at a defining moment in shaping its role in the evolving global economy and emphasized the importance of creating conditions that support large-scale, long-term investment.

Al Rumayyan pointed to opportunities in areas such as energy transition projects, technological innovation and strategic infrastructure development. His remarks carried significant weight, given that the Public Investment Fund manages assets worth about $1.15 trillion, while Aramco remains one of the world’s most profitable energy companies.

Organisers said the choice of Rome as the summit venue reflected Europe’s potential to combine historical influence with forward-looking reform ambitions. The message repeated throughout the event was that while Europe continues to attract strong investor interest, its ability to convert that interest into sustained economic growth will depend on how quickly it modernizes its regulatory environment and accelerates structural reforms.

Continue Reading

Business

Oil Prices Slide as US–Iran Accord Eases Supply Fears While Markets React to Fed Policy Shift

Published

on

Global crude prices extended losses on Thursday after the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending their conflict and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global energy shipments. Equity markets also responded unevenly as investors digested the Federal Reserve’s latest policy signals.

Oil benchmarks dropped in early trading following confirmation that US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had signed an initial agreement designed to halt hostilities and restore normal maritime flows through the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway handles a significant share of global crude exports, and expectations of its reopening immediately weighed on prices.

At the time of writing, West Texas Intermediate fell 2.3% to around $75 a barrel, while Brent crude slipped about 2% to $78 a barrel. Although both benchmarks remain above pre-conflict levels near $70, they have retreated sharply from recent highs above $100 recorded during the height of the tensions.

The agreement sets a 60-day period for negotiations on a final settlement addressing Iran’s nuclear programme. In the interim, Tehran has agreed to reduce its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. The deal also includes provisions for easing sanctions, allowing Iran to resume oil exports and enabling tanker traffic to move more freely through the Persian Gulf.

US officials have indicated that the Strait of Hormuz could be fully reopened by Friday without transit fees, a development that has reinforced expectations of increased global supply. President Trump, commenting after the signing, said “oil down, stocks up,” reflecting market reactions to the accord.

Despite the easing outlook, the International Energy Agency has warned that global oil markets remain fragile. Strategic reserves in advanced economies have fallen to their lowest levels since 1990, with OECD stockpiles declining by more than 160 million barrels since the conflict began. The agency also revised down its demand forecast, citing weaker consumption and elevated fuel prices.

See also  El Salvador's Church Urges President to Maintain Ban on Gold Mining Amid Environmental Concerns

Flows through the Strait of Hormuz had already begun recovering before the agreement, reaching roughly 12 million barrels per day in early June after a period of disruption.

Financial markets, meanwhile, delivered a mixed performance following the Federal Reserve’s latest projections. Wall Street fell on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 down 1.2%, the Dow Jones off 1%, and the Nasdaq losing 1.3%, after policymakers signalled the possibility of interest rate increases later this year.

In his first press conference as Fed chair, Kevin Warsh avoided committing to a clear policy path, signalling a shift in how the central bank communicates future decisions. US President Donald Trump, attending the G7 summit in France, described the situation as “whatever,” while acknowledging uncertainty over potential rate hikes.

Early trading on Thursday pointed to a rebound, with US futures higher and Asian equities advancing on optimism over easing geopolitical risks. European markets opened more cautiously, reflecting lingering uncertainty despite the improving energy outlook.

Continue Reading

Business

Kevin Warsh Begins Fed Tenure as Markets Watch for Clues on Future Rate Path

Published

on

The US Federal Reserve enters a new phase on Wednesday as Kevin Warsh presides over his first policy meeting as chair, marking a closely watched leadership transition in American monetary policy. While economists broadly expect interest rates to remain unchanged, investors are focused on signals that could define the central bank’s direction under new leadership.

The Federal Open Market Committee is expected to keep the benchmark interest rate within the 3.50% to 3.75% range, extending a steady policy stance for a fourth consecutive meeting. The last adjustment came in December 2025, when rates were reduced by 25 basis points.

Although no immediate policy shift is anticipated, attention is centred on the language of the Fed’s statement and Chair Warsh’s first press conference. Analysts say even subtle changes in wording could indicate whether policymakers are leaning toward holding rates higher for longer or considering future increases if inflation remains persistent.

Warsh assumes leadership during a more complex economic environment than when he was previously associated with calls for lower interest rates. At that time, he aligned with arguments suggesting artificial intelligence-driven productivity gains could help ease inflation pressures. However, economists now point to continued inflationary risks tied to investment cycles in technology sectors, which have contributed to demand pressures across the economy.

Inflation has risen since the outbreak of the Iran conflict in February, reaching 4.2%, its highest level in three years, largely driven by higher energy costs. Although a US-backed framework for a peace deal has been announced, uncertainty remains over its durability, and analysts warn that any relief in fuel prices could take months to filter through to broader inflation measures.

See also  UK Economy Stagnates in Q3 Amid Growing Recession Fears

The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge has remained above its 2% target for more than five years. At the same time, the labour market continues to show resilience, with 172,000 jobs added in May, marking the third consecutive month of solid employment growth. This stability has reduced pressure for further rate cuts that were previously projected earlier in the year.

Because interest rates are expected to remain unchanged, market attention has shifted to the Fed’s updated Summary of Economic Projections and the “dot plot”, which outlines policymakers’ expectations for future rate movements. Some economists, including those at Bank of America, anticipate that the projections may indicate no rate cuts through 2026, with a minority of officials even signalling potential rate increases.

Communication strategy is also expected to be a key focus under Warsh. He has previously argued that the Fed should reduce the frequency of public commentary to avoid constraining policy flexibility. One possible change could involve returning to fewer press conferences, a model last used under former Chair Ben Bernanke.

However, analysts caution that reduced communication could unsettle financial markets that have grown reliant on clear forward guidance from the central bank.

Adding to the complexity, former chair Jerome Powell remains on the Fed’s board as a governor and is expected to participate in Wednesday’s vote, maintaining influence over policy decisions during the transition period.

Continue Reading

Trending