Connect with us

Business

Oil jumps above $100 after Iranian strikes on Omani energy facilities

Published

on

Global oil prices surged above $100 per barrel on Thursday after fresh attacks linked to Iran targeted oil storage facilities in Oman, offsetting the expected market relief from a record emergency oil release announced a day earlier.

Benchmark Brent crude climbed sharply during trading, briefly moving above the $100 mark before easing slightly. Prices still remained significantly higher than earlier in the week, reflecting continued volatility in global energy markets.

The spike came despite an unprecedented move by the International Energy Agency, which on Wednesday announced a coordinated release of 400 million barrels from emergency stockpiles held by its 32 member countries. The measure is the largest such release in the agency’s history and more than twice the volume deployed after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Shortly after the announcement, Iranian forces launched drone strikes targeting fuel storage tanks and silos at the Salalah Port, triggering fires that local authorities were still working to contain late Wednesday.

British maritime security firm Ambrey confirmed damage at the site, while Danish shipping company Maersk temporarily suspended port operations as a precaution.

Omani officials said the attacks had not disrupted domestic fuel supplies, though investigations into the incident were continuing. Iranian state media reported that President Masoud Pezeshkian assured Haitham bin Tariq that the events would be examined.

The security situation also worsened at sea. At least six vessels were reportedly struck in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, including a container ship hit by a projectile near the United Arab Emirates and two tankers damaged in waters near Iraq. Monitoring groups such as UK Maritime Trade Operations attributed the incidents to Iranian forces or allied groups.

See also  Google Unveils £5bn UK Investment Ahead of Trump’s State Visit

Since the start of the conflict, at least 16 ships have reportedly been struck in the region, intensifying concerns about the security of global energy supplies.

The Strait of Hormuz normally carries about one-fifth of the world’s oil shipments. However, analysts estimate that exports of crude and refined products from the region have fallen to just 10–15 percent of pre-war levels as shipping traffic declines sharply.

In response to the crisis, several countries are contributing to the IEA’s coordinated reserve release. The United States alone plans to supply 172 million barrels, while Germany, France and Italy have also confirmed they will tap emergency stockpiles. Japan said it will begin releasing oil next week.

IEA executive director Fatih Birol described the crisis as an oil market disruption “unprecedented in scale,” saying the coordinated action reflects strong cooperation among major energy-consuming nations.

Despite the intervention, analysts say the reserve release may have limited impact if the disruption to supply continues. Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING, said the release could not fully offset the roughly 15 million barrels per day currently affected by the conflict.

Economists also warn that prolonged disruptions could push oil prices significantly higher. Analysts at Oxford Economics said crude prices could approach $140 per barrel if tensions persist, a level that could trigger a mild global recession.

Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, has warned that sustained increases in oil prices would likely push global inflation higher and slow economic growth worldwide.

Energy markets remain focused on developments in the Strait of Hormuz, with analysts saying the restoration of normal shipping routes will be critical for stabilising oil prices in the coming weeks.

See also  Eurozone Inflation Surges on Energy Shock, ECB Faces Tough Decisions

Business

Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady as Middle East Conflict Clouds Economic Outlook

Published

on

The Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged on Wednesday, marking the third consecutive meeting without a move as policymakers weigh rising inflation and growing uncertainty linked to the conflict in the Middle East.

The decision leaves the federal funds rate in a target range of 3.50% to 3.75%. While widely expected, the outcome revealed significant divisions within the central bank’s policy-setting committee, underscoring the difficult balancing act facing officials.

In its post-meeting statement, the Fed said recent developments in the Middle East had added to uncertainty surrounding the US economic outlook. It noted that inflation remains above target, partly due to higher global energy prices following renewed tensions in the region.

Despite holding rates steady, the central bank signalled that cuts remain possible later this year if inflation eases and economic conditions weaken. Still, the decision was far from unanimous. Three policymakers opposed language suggesting future rate cuts, while one official, Stephen Miran, argued for an immediate reduction.

The dissent marked the highest level of disagreement within the Federal Open Market Committee since 1992, highlighting a widening debate over how best to respond to slowing growth and persistent price pressures.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who is expected to step down as chair in May, said the central bank must remain cautious as it navigates a complex economic environment. Inflation has risen to 3.3%, well above the Fed’s 2% target, while recent data show the labour market is losing momentum.

Although unemployment remains relatively low at 4.3%, hiring has slowed considerably in recent months. Policymakers are trying to prevent inflation from becoming entrenched while avoiding unnecessary damage to economic growth.

See also  European Automakers Struggle as CATL and Stellantis Announce €4.1 Billion EV Battery Plant in Spain

Powell also indicated that he intends to remain on the Fed’s Board of Governors after his term as chair ends, potentially until early 2028. He cited concerns about maintaining institutional stability amid what he described as mounting political pressure on the central bank.

His decision would temporarily prevent President Donald Trump from appointing another governor immediately, even as Trump’s nominee to succeed Powell as chair, Kevin Warsh, moves closer to confirmation.

Warsh has advocated broad changes to the Fed’s policymaking framework and has expressed support for lower interest rates. However, with inflation still elevated, analysts say any shift toward easier monetary policy may be gradual.

The Fed’s next moves will likely depend on how inflation, employment and energy markets evolve in the coming months. For now, policymakers appear determined to proceed carefully as geopolitical risks and domestic economic challenges continue to shape the outlook.

Continue Reading

Business

Debate Grows in Germany Over Using Gold Reserves to Ease Economic Pressures

Published

on

Germany’s vast gold reserves have become the focus of renewed political and economic debate, as calls grow for part of the stockpile to be used to support households, businesses and public investment.

The German Bundesbank holds 3,350 tonnes of gold, making it the world’s second-largest national reserve after the United States. With gold prices recently rising above $4,700 per troy ounce, the value of Germany’s holdings has climbed to nearly €440 billion.

Marcel Fratzscher, president of the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), has suggested that some of this reserve could be put to practical use. He described the gold stockpile as a valuable resource in times of economic strain and argued that selling a portion could help fund investments in infrastructure and education, while also easing financial pressure on consumers and businesses.

The proposal comes as Germany continues to grapple with rising living costs. Consumer prices remain elevated, with sectors such as transport seeing particularly sharp increases. Official figures show that the Motorists’ Index, which tracks driving-related expenses, was 6.7% higher in March than a year earlier.

Germany’s gold reserves are not all held domestically. About one-third, or 1,236 tonnes, is stored at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, while another 404 tonnes is held in London. The remainder is kept in Frankfurt. All reserves remain under the ownership and management of the Bundesbank.

The overseas storage arrangement dates back to the post-war Bretton Woods era, when Germany’s trade surpluses were converted into gold. Although the Bundesbank repatriated 374 tonnes from Paris in 2017, most of its foreign-held gold remains in New York.

See also  Trump Administration Imposes New Fees on Chinese Ships, Escalating Trade Tensions

That has prompted fresh political scrutiny. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups have questioned whether Germany should continue to keep such a large share of its reserves abroad, particularly in the United States.

The Alternative for Germany party has called for the full repatriation of the country’s gold, while also suggesting it could serve as backing for a future national currency. The proposal has been widely rejected by mainstream parties, which have defended both the security of the reserves and Germany’s commitment to the euro.

Others have focused less on location and more on whether some of the gold should be sold. Supporters of that view argue that the reserves could be used more actively during periods of economic difficulty.

The Bundesbank, however, has consistently opposed any sale. It regards gold as a cornerstone of financial stability and a long-term safeguard for confidence in Germany’s monetary system.

While no immediate policy change appears likely, the discussion reflects growing pressure on policymakers to consider every available option as Europe’s largest economy faces mounting economic challenges.

Continue Reading

Business

European Fuel Prices Remain Elevated After Iran Conflict Despite Ceasefire

Published

on

Fuel prices across Europe remain significantly higher than before the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, even after a ceasefire helped ease some of the market pressure.

Petrol and diesel costs surged in the weeks following the military action launched on 28 February, when the United States and Israel carried out strikes against Iranian targets. Iran responded with retaliatory attacks across the region, stoking fears of supply disruptions in global energy markets. Although Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire on 8 April, fuel prices have yet to return to pre-crisis levels.

Data from the European Commission’s Weekly Oil Bulletin show that the average price of petrol across the European Union rose from €1.64 per litre on 23 February to €1.83 by 20 April, an increase of 12%.

Several countries recorded much steeper rises. Belgium, Czechia and Bulgaria each saw petrol prices jump by 22%. Among Europe’s largest economies, France posted the sharpest increase at 18%, followed by Germany at 15%. Italy experienced a 7% rise, while Spain saw a more modest 3% increase. Petrol prices in Malta remained unchanged.

Diesel prices climbed even faster. Across the EU, the average price of diesel rose from €1.59 to €2.01 per litre over the same period, marking a 26% increase. That is more than double the rise recorded for petrol.

Bulgaria experienced the largest diesel increase at 43%. France followed closely with a 36% rise, while Estonia and Belgium recorded increases of 35% and 33%, respectively. Spain’s diesel prices rose by 27%, exceeding the EU average, while Germany and Italy saw increases of 23% and 24%.

See also  Gold Retreats Sharply from Record Highs Amid Shifting Market Sentiment

Despite the recent pullback, fuel prices remain high in many countries. The Netherlands currently has the highest petrol price in Europe at €2.28 per litre, followed by Denmark at €2.22. Germany, Greece and France all report petrol prices above €2 per litre.

For diesel, the Netherlands also tops the list at €2.30 per litre. Finland, France, Denmark and Belgium are close behind, all above €2.19.

At the other end of the scale, Malta has the lowest fuel prices in Europe. Petrol there costs €1.34 per litre, while diesel stands at just €1.21. Poland and Bulgaria also rank among the least expensive markets.

Fuel prices had already begun climbing before the strikes, but accelerated sharply in March and early April. Diesel briefly exceeded €2.10 per litre before retreating after the ceasefire announcement.

The latest price surge highlights Europe’s continued vulnerability to geopolitical shocks in energy-producing regions. With taxes accounting for a substantial share of pump prices and conventional vehicles still dominating European roads, households and businesses remain exposed to swings in global oil markets.

Continue Reading

Trending