Tech
US Government Designates Anthropic a Supply Chain Risk, Military Contractors Reconsider Use of Claude
The Trump administration has officially designated artificial intelligence company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, a move that could force government contractors to stop using its AI chatbot, Claude. The Pentagon said Thursday that it informed Anthropic leadership that the company and its products are now considered a supply chain threat, effective immediately.
The decision follows a standoff over Anthropic’s refusal to remove safety guardrails designed to prevent mass surveillance of Americans and the development of fully autonomous weapons. President Donald Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had previously accused the company of endangering national security and threatened a series of penalties.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei responded that the designation is legally questionable and said the company plans to challenge it in court. He emphasised that the exceptions Claude enforces are limited to high-level use cases, not operational military decisions, and that prior discussions with the Pentagon had focused on maintaining access to Claude while establishing a smooth transition if required.
The Pentagon argued that restricting access to Claude could endanger warfighters. “The military will not allow a vendor to insert itself into the chain of command by restricting the lawful use of a critical capability and put our warfighters at risk,” the department said. Trump has given the military six months to phase out the AI system, which is already embedded across multiple military and national security platforms.
Some defence contractors have already responded. Lockheed Martin said it will follow the Pentagon’s direction and seek other AI providers but does not anticipate major disruptions. Microsoft, whose lawyers studied the scope of the risk designation, said it can continue working with Anthropic on non-defence projects.
The move has drawn criticism from lawmakers and former officials. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand called the designation “a dangerous misuse of a tool meant to address adversary-controlled technology.” A letter signed by former defence and intelligence leaders, including former CIA director Michael Hayden, argued that applying supply chain rules to a domestic company is a “category error” and sets a troubling precedent. The letter stressed that such rules are meant to protect against foreign adversaries, not American innovators operating under the law.
Despite losing some defence contracts, Anthropic has seen a surge in consumer downloads over the past week, with more than a million people signing up for Claude daily. The app has surpassed OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini in more than 20 countries’ Apple App Store rankings, reflecting public support for the company’s stance.
The dispute has also intensified Anthropic’s rivalry with OpenAI, whose CEO Sam Altman acknowledged that a recent military deal for ChatGPT in classified environments was rushed and required adjustments. Amodei expressed regret over an internal note he sent criticizing OpenAI and the Pentagon’s decision, apologizing for language that suggested the company was punished for not offering “dictator-like praise” to Trump.
The Pentagon’s designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk marks an unprecedented escalation in the government’s effort to assert control over AI technologies used in national security, highlighting tensions between innovation, ethics, and military priorities.
Tech
Meta Apps Collect More User Data Than Other Big Tech, Study Finds
Meta’s apps collect more types of user data on average than applications from other major technology companies, according to research by cybersecurity and privacy company Surfshark.
The study analysed 171 apps available through Apple’s App Store that were developed by Meta, Google, Microsoft, Apple and Amazon. Researchers examined the types of information identified in each app’s privacy disclosures across 35 data categories.
Meta ranked highest, with its apps collecting an average of 25 out of 35 possible data types. Surfshark said this was more than three times the average recorded for some other major technology companies.
The categories examined included information such as browsing history, precise location, purchase details and other personal data that applications can collect or associate with users.
Seven of the apps identified among the most data-intensive were owned by Meta. They included Facebook, Messenger and Meta AI, as well as Meta Horizon, Meta Ads Manager, Meta Business Suite and Forum.
The findings put Meta well ahead of the other companies included in the analysis.
Google apps collected an average of 17 data types, according to Surfshark, while Amazon collected 12. Microsoft averaged eight types and Apple seven.
The research focuses on the number of data categories associated with each application rather than the volume of individual records collected from users. It also reflects information disclosed by developers through App Store privacy labels, which can vary according to how companies classify and report their data practices.
Meta operates some of the world’s most widely used digital platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and WhatsApp. Its services rely heavily on advertising and personalised experiences, making user information an important part of its business model.
The findings are likely to renew questions about how much personal information consumers share when using popular social media and technology services.
Privacy concerns have increased as technology companies expand their use of artificial intelligence, targeted advertising and personalised recommendations. AI-powered applications can require access to additional information depending on their features and how users interact with them.
Surfshark’s analysis does not by itself establish whether any company has violated privacy laws or whether the data collected is used improperly. The number of data categories listed by an app also does not necessarily indicate how much information a particular user contributes.
However, the research highlights the differences in data collection practices among major technology companies.
The findings could encourage users to review application privacy settings and the information requested by apps before installing or continuing to use them.
As regulators and consumers place greater scrutiny on digital privacy, technology companies face increasing pressure to explain clearly what information they collect, why it is needed and how long it is retained.
Tech
Anthropic AI Models Accessed Three Organisations During Security Testing
Tech
Digital Barter Apps Gain Popularity as Rising Living Costs Drive Skills-for-Time Economy
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
