Tech
Palantir Manifesto Sparks Backlash Over AI Weapons and Cultural Claims
A controversial online post by Palantir Technologies has triggered widespread criticism after the firm outlined views on artificial intelligence, national service, and global cultural differences, prompting concern from politicians and analysts.
The post, shared on X over the weekend, has been described as a 22-point manifesto summarising ideas from the book The Technological Republic, written by company chief executive Alex Karp and head of corporate affairs Nicholas Zamiska. While framed by the company as a brief overview, its content has drawn sharp reactions for its tone and proposals.
Among the most contentious statements was a claim that some cultures have contributed major advancements while others remain “dysfunctional and regressive.” The post also called for renewed emphasis on national service and suggested that technology firms have a moral responsibility to support defence initiatives.
Critics were quick to respond. Yanis Varoufakis warned that the message pointed toward a future shaped by “AI-powered killer robots,” highlighting concerns over the growing role of autonomous weapons. In the United Kingdom, Victoria Collins described the manifesto as resembling “the ramblings of a supervillain,” questioning whether companies with such views should be involved in public sector work.
The document also suggested rethinking post-war geopolitical arrangements, including what it described as restrictions placed on countries such as Germany and Japan after World War II. It further encouraged a greater role for religion in public life, adding to the debate around the company’s broader ideological stance.
Industry observers note that Palantir Technologies is not an ordinary tech firm. Founded in 2003 by Alex Karp and billionaire investor Peter Thiel, the company provides data analytics software to governments, military agencies, and law enforcement bodies worldwide. Its contracts include work with the US military and the UK’s National Health Service, placing it at the intersection of technology, security, and public policy.
Eliot Higgins, head of the investigative platform Bellingcat, said the manifesto should be viewed in the context of the company’s business model. He argued that the ideas outlined are not abstract philosophy but reflect the outlook of a firm whose revenue is tied to defence, intelligence, and policing.
The debate comes at a time when artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping industries and raising ethical questions about its use in warfare and governance. Palantir’s post suggests that the development of AI-driven weapons is inevitable, framing the issue as a matter of who controls the technology rather than whether it should exist.
The backlash highlights growing unease over the influence of private technology companies in shaping policies that extend beyond commercial innovation into global security and societal values.
Tech
Meta Apps Collect More User Data Than Other Big Tech, Study Finds
Meta’s apps collect more types of user data on average than applications from other major technology companies, according to research by cybersecurity and privacy company Surfshark.
The study analysed 171 apps available through Apple’s App Store that were developed by Meta, Google, Microsoft, Apple and Amazon. Researchers examined the types of information identified in each app’s privacy disclosures across 35 data categories.
Meta ranked highest, with its apps collecting an average of 25 out of 35 possible data types. Surfshark said this was more than three times the average recorded for some other major technology companies.
The categories examined included information such as browsing history, precise location, purchase details and other personal data that applications can collect or associate with users.
Seven of the apps identified among the most data-intensive were owned by Meta. They included Facebook, Messenger and Meta AI, as well as Meta Horizon, Meta Ads Manager, Meta Business Suite and Forum.
The findings put Meta well ahead of the other companies included in the analysis.
Google apps collected an average of 17 data types, according to Surfshark, while Amazon collected 12. Microsoft averaged eight types and Apple seven.
The research focuses on the number of data categories associated with each application rather than the volume of individual records collected from users. It also reflects information disclosed by developers through App Store privacy labels, which can vary according to how companies classify and report their data practices.
Meta operates some of the world’s most widely used digital platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and WhatsApp. Its services rely heavily on advertising and personalised experiences, making user information an important part of its business model.
The findings are likely to renew questions about how much personal information consumers share when using popular social media and technology services.
Privacy concerns have increased as technology companies expand their use of artificial intelligence, targeted advertising and personalised recommendations. AI-powered applications can require access to additional information depending on their features and how users interact with them.
Surfshark’s analysis does not by itself establish whether any company has violated privacy laws or whether the data collected is used improperly. The number of data categories listed by an app also does not necessarily indicate how much information a particular user contributes.
However, the research highlights the differences in data collection practices among major technology companies.
The findings could encourage users to review application privacy settings and the information requested by apps before installing or continuing to use them.
As regulators and consumers place greater scrutiny on digital privacy, technology companies face increasing pressure to explain clearly what information they collect, why it is needed and how long it is retained.
Tech
Anthropic AI Models Accessed Three Organisations During Security Testing
Tech
Digital Barter Apps Gain Popularity as Rising Living Costs Drive Skills-for-Time Economy
-
Entertainment2 years agoMeta Acquires Tilda Swinton VR Doc ‘Impulse: Playing With Reality’
-
Sports2 years agoChina’s Historic Olympic Victory Sparks National Pride Amid Controversy
-
Business2 years agoSaudi Arabia’s Model for Sustainable Aviation Practices
-
Business2 years agoRecent Developments in Small Business Taxes
-
Home Improvement2 years agoEffective Drain Cleaning: A Key to a Healthy Plumbing System
-
Politics2 years agoWho was Ebrahim Raisi and his status in Iranian Politics?
-
Sports2 years agoKeely Hodgkinson Wins Britain’s First Athletics Gold at Paris Olympics in 800m
-
Business2 years agoCarrectly: Revolutionizing Car Care in Chicago
