Connect with us

News

Israel Withdraws from Gaza’s Netzarim Corridor as Ceasefire Deal Progresses

Published

on

Israel has completed its withdrawal from the Netzarim Corridor, a strategic road that bisected Gaza, fulfilling a key commitment under its ceasefire agreement with Hamas. The move marks a significant step in the ongoing negotiations, allowing displaced Palestinians to cross the corridor freely for the first time in months.

Palestinians Return to the North Amid Destruction

As Israeli troops vacated the area, thousands of Palestinians began crossing the corridor—some on foot, others in vehicles, and even by donkey. However, travelers still faced challenges, including checkpoint inspections and navigating the devastation left by months of fighting.

“I was displaced a long time ago,” said Osama Saleem, a Palestinian waiting for his vehicle to be checked. “I have seen people arriving on this road, sometimes even sleeping on it while waiting for the Israeli army to withdraw. I hope the Israeli army withdraws from all of Gaza and that life returns to normal.”

The Netzarim Corridor, a six-kilometer stretch of land cutting across Gaza, was under Israeli control since the early days of the war. Hamas declared the withdrawal a victory, stating: “The withdrawal of the Zionist occupation army from the Netzarim axis is a victory for the will of our people.”

Although Israel has not officially confirmed the withdrawal, journalists on the ground reported no Israeli presence at the corridor by Sunday.

Ceasefire Agreement and Hostage Releases

The pullout is part of Israel’s commitments under the fragile ceasefire and hostage agreement, which has seen the release of 16 hostages so far, out of a promised 33. On Saturday, Israel secured the release of three hostagesOhad Ben Ami, Eli Sharabi, and Or Levy—in exchange for 183 Palestinian prisoners. However, images of the freed hostages appearing frail and malnourished have sparked outrage in Israel.

See also  Russia Launches Largest Aerial Assault of War on Ukraine, Killing 12 Amid Prisoner Swap

The ceasefire deal remains uncertain as negotiations continue. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed hesitation about moving forward with the next phases, which could require a full military withdrawal from Gaza. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has even threatened to resign if the ceasefire continues.

An Israeli delegation is set to travel to Doha for further negotiations, though officials described it as a “mid-level” team discussing technical details rather than making binding decisions.

Tensions Persist Despite Withdrawal

Despite the withdrawal, violence has not ceased. Just hours later, Israeli forces opened fire on civilians near Nahal Oz, close to Gaza’s northern border. Palestinian officials reported three people killed and others wounded. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) stated it had fired warning shots at suspects approaching the border, acknowledging that several hits were identified but without confirming civilian casualties.

Meanwhile, in the occupied West Bank, Israel announced an expansion of military operations. Palestinian health officials reported that Israeli troops shot and killed a pregnant woman on Sunday, though Israel has not yet commented on the incident.

Uncertain Future for Gaza’s Ceasefire

As international mediators work to stabilize the ceasefire, the next phase of negotiations will determine whether Israel fully withdraws from Gaza and whether the remaining hostages will be released. With Netanyahu under pressure from both hardliners and international allies, the ceasefire’s future remains in doubt.

News

EU Must End ‘Naivety’ on Trade and Confront China’s Industrial Strategy, Says French Minister

Published

on

France’s Minister for Foreign Trade, Nicolas Forissier, has called on the European Union to abandon what he described as “naivety” in its approach to global trade, urging a tougher stance on countries accused of distorting markets through industrial policy and trade practices.

Speaking in an interview with Euronews’ 12 Minutes With programme, Forissier said Europe must respond more firmly to what he described as the weaponisation of trade dependencies, warning that China in particular could damage its own long-term interests by undermining European industry.

“The Chinese have to understand that they won’t win anything if they destroy the European industry and then the European market, which is an essential market for them,” he said. “We must no longer be naive.”

His comments come as the European Commission prepares to hold an “orientation debate” next week on how to respond to a surge of low-cost Chinese imports. The discussion is expected to shape possible new trade defence measures, with further talks likely when EU leaders meet in Brussels in mid-June.

Forissier said the shift in thinking was not limited to China alone but applied to any country using commercial leverage to gain strategic advantage. “It is not only China,” he said. “It is all the countries that weaponise trade.”

Among the proposals under consideration is a requirement for EU companies to diversify supply chains, sourcing components from at least three different suppliers in order to reduce dependency on any single foreign market. Asked whether he supported such a measure, Forissier replied: “Yes, we have to.”

See also  Saudi Doctor Charged Over Christmas Market Attack in Magdeburg

Other options include targeted tariffs on sensitive industries such as chemicals, alongside stronger use of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tools to counter imports priced below domestic market levels. These measures are designed to address concerns over overcapacity in China’s industrial sector and its impact on European manufacturers.

The debate is taking place against a backdrop of widening trade imbalances. EU goods imports from China exceeded exports by €359.3 billion in 2025, marking an increase of nearly 20% compared with the previous year.

China has already warned it could retaliate if the bloc imposes new restrictions, raising concerns about potential escalation in trade tensions between two of the world’s largest economies.

France has repeatedly pushed for a more assertive European trade policy, arguing that state subsidies, export controls on raw materials and industrial overproduction in major economies are distorting global markets.

Forissier stressed that Europe must maintain open dialogue with Beijing while defending its own industrial base. “We try to respect the Chinese,” he said. “The Chinese have to respect us, and this is the message European institutions have to send.”

Continue Reading

News

US Says Iran Talks ‘Borderline’ as Pakistan Pushes Diplomacy Amid War Tensions

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has said ongoing negotiations over the conflict involving Iran are teetering on the “borderline” between reaching a diplomatic agreement and a return to renewed military strikes, as tensions continue to rise across the region.

The remarks came as Pakistan’s army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran for fresh talks aimed at de-escalating the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. His visit follows a series of high-level diplomatic engagements involving Pakistani officials and Iranian leadership in recent days.

Munir was received in Tehran by Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, alongside Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who has also travelled to the Iranian capital multiple times this week for meetings with senior officials.

Despite the renewed diplomatic activity, Iran has downplayed expectations of a breakthrough. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the visit did not signal any decisive shift in negotiations, describing the differences between the parties as “deep and extensive,” according to Iran’s ISNA news agency.

Speaking at a NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there had been limited progress in the discussions but cautioned against optimism.

“There’s a little bit of movement and that’s good,” Rubio said, adding that he did not want to exaggerate developments. He also warned that Washington retains “other options” if diplomacy fails, echoing Trump’s earlier comments that military action remains on the table if Iran does not agree to terms.

Trump has previously stated that he paused consideration of a strike due to what he described as “serious negotiations” taking place, but has repeatedly warned that the fragile ceasefire reached in mid-April could collapse.

See also  At Least Five Explosions Hit Dubai in Iranian Missile and Drone Strike

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran remained committed to talks despite what he called repeated breaches of diplomacy by Washington. He said Iran was participating “with a responsible approach and with all seriousness” in an effort to secure what he described as a fair outcome, according to Iranian state media.

A key point of contention remains the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime route through which a significant share of global oil and gas supplies pass. Iranian actions in the waterway and US responses have heightened fears of wider economic disruption.

Iran has effectively restricted access through the strait, while US Central Command has reportedly blocked Iranian ports and redirected commercial vessels since mid-April. The European Union has since expanded its sanctions framework targeting those involved, calling the blockade contrary to international law.

Rubio said allied nations were also discussing contingency plans in case negotiations fail, warning that the situation may require a “plan B” if diplomatic efforts collapse.

Continue Reading

News

US Green Card Rule Change Forces Most Applicants to Apply From Abroad

Published

on

A sweeping policy change in the United States has upended a long-standing immigration process, requiring most foreign nationals seeking green cards to leave the country and complete their applications from abroad.

Under the new directive issued Friday by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), individuals in the United States on temporary visas — including work, student and tourist permits — will generally no longer be able to adjust their status to permanent residency while remaining in the country. Instead, they must return to their home countries and apply through US consulates, except in limited “extraordinary circumstances.”

USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said the policy was intended to realign the immigration system with its original framework.

“From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances,” Kahler said. He added that the change would reduce incentives for people to remain in the US after visa denials.

The decision marks a significant departure from decades of practice, under which many migrants have been allowed to apply for permanent residency from within the United States. That pathway has been commonly used by spouses of US citizens, workers, students, and individuals with family ties in the country.

The process of obtaining a green card often takes months or even years, raising concerns that applicants may now be forced to leave jobs, homes and families while waiting for approval abroad.

Immigration attorneys and advocacy groups said they were still assessing the scope of the policy and how it would be enforced. Many also warned that practical barriers could make compliance difficult, particularly for applicants from countries where travel is restricted or where US consular services are limited or unavailable.

See also  Hungarian Passenger Clings to Train Traveling at 282 kph, Arrested After Unscheduled Stop

Shev Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association said the move appeared to disrupt established procedures. “USCIS is trying to upend decades of processing of adjustment of status,” she said, noting widespread uncertainty over who would be affected.

Jessie De Haven of the California Immigration Project said the policy could discourage eligible applicants from proceeding altogether. “It’s really hard to tell how this is going to be applied,” she said. “I do think it might have a chilling effect on people applying.”

The announcement forms part of a broader immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, which has sought to tighten legal pathways while increasing enforcement measures against irregular migration.

Officials have framed the change as an effort to close loopholes and strengthen oversight of the immigration system. Critics, however, argue it could lead to prolonged separations for families and create new obstacles for lawful immigrants seeking permanent residency in the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending