Health

EU Unveils Critical Medicines Act to Secure Drug Supply, But Key Questions Remain

Published

1 year ago

March 15, 2025

RTX

The European Commission has introduced the Critical Medicines Act, a major initiative aimed at strengthening the EU’s access to essential medicines. The proposal, unveiled this week, seeks to reduce dependency on non-EU suppliers, enhance joint procurement, and encourage European production. However, questions remain over its funding, stockpiling strategy, and potential trade risks.

‘Buy European’ Proposal Raises Trade Concerns

One of the Act’s most debated measures is the ‘Buy European’ rule, which would prioritize suppliers manufacturing a significant portion of critical medicines within the EU. The goal is to ensure a more reliable drug supply, but critics warn that this protectionist approach could trigger retaliation from global trade partners.

EU Health Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi defended the policy, calling it “a necessary step for public health security.” However, comparisons have been drawn to China’s ‘Buy China’ policy, which the EU itself has criticized for restricting foreign suppliers. If the EU moves forward with this approach, it could face trade tensions and reduced market access abroad.

Boosting European Production Without Full Relocation

The proposal also aims to reduce reliance on non-EU pharmaceutical production by promoting increased manufacturing within Europe. However, rather than requiring production to be strictly within EU borders, the plan emphasizes bilateral partnerships with neighboring countries such as the UK, Switzerland, and EU candidate nations.

“I rely on our closest neighbors to help bring production closer to the EU,” said Várhelyi, suggesting that strategic supply chain diversification is the Commission’s preferred approach over full relocation.

Funding Challenges Could Limit Impact

A key concern surrounding the Act is funding constraints. The Commission has allocated €83 million for 2026-2027, primarily from the EU4Health program. However, this budget is too small to support large-scale manufacturing shifts, raising doubts about the proposal’s effectiveness.

While additional funding could come from Horizon Europe and the Digital Europe Programme, 11 EU health ministers have called for defense funding to include medicine production, an idea that Várhelyi rejected. Instead, the Commission is loosening state aid restrictions, encouraging member states to fund production efforts themselves.

Strengthening Joint Drug Procurement

To improve purchasing efficiency, the Act enhances the EU’s joint procurement mechanism. Traditionally, the Commission and at least nine member states negotiate as a single bloc to secure better pricing and supply terms. The new proposal expands this approach, allowing the Commission to act as a central buyer upon request.

Additionally, a cross-border procurement model will be introduced, where the Commission provides logistical and administrative support to individual member states handling their own drug purchases.

Stockpiling Strategy Left Out

One of the biggest gaps in the proposal is the lack of a coordinated stockpiling framework. The Critical Medicine Alliance had recommended a harmonized EU-wide contingency stock, ensuring member states share supplies during shortages.

However, this was omitted from the final proposal, sparking concerns of fragmented and inequitable stockpiling across the bloc. Croatian MEP Tomislav Sokol warned that larger countries hoarding supplies at the expense of smaller nations must not happen again.

What’s Next?

As the Critical Medicines Act moves into the legislative process, MEPs are expected to push for amendments, particularly to address stockpiling coordination and funding gaps. While the proposal marks a major step toward securing Europe’s medicine supply, unresolved questions could shape its final impact in the coming months.

Health

Study Finds Men Far More Likely Than Women to ‘Hit the Wall’ in Marathons

Published

2 days ago

July 4, 2026

Web Reporter

Men are significantly more likely than women to experience the dreaded marathon phenomenon known as “hitting the wall,” according to a large international study that analysed the performances of more than 870,000 runners over a 26-year period.

The research, published in the journal Scientific Reports, examined the results of 873,334 finishers in the Berlin Marathon between 1999 and 2025. Researchers found that although men generally complete marathons faster than women, they are much more likely to suffer a dramatic slowdown during the later stages of the race because of less consistent pacing.

According to the study, men are almost twice as likely overall to experience a sudden decline in speed during a marathon. In some performance categories, they were found to be up to six times more likely than women to “hit the wall,” a term commonly used to describe severe physical exhaustion caused by depleted energy stores.

Researchers said the findings point to differences in race strategy rather than physical ability alone. Men were more likely to begin races at an aggressive pace, increasing the risk of fatigue before reaching the finish line.

The study concluded that “men, regardless of performance level, are more prone to aggressive pacing and catastrophic deceleration.” The authors suggested that greater willingness to take risks and higher levels of confidence may encourage many male runners to start faster than they can realistically sustain over the full 42.195-kilometre distance.

Women, on the other hand, displayed more controlled pacing throughout the race. Researchers found they were better at regulating their effort from start to finish, reducing the likelihood of a significant loss of speed during the closing kilometres.

The report described women as showing “superior self-pacing abilities and greater resistance to decision-making fatigue,” characteristics that can be particularly valuable during endurance events.

Maintaining a steady pace is widely regarded as one of the most important factors in marathon performance. Running too quickly during the opening stages can rapidly consume the body’s glycogen reserves, leaving athletes without enough energy to sustain their speed in the final part of the race.

The researchers noted that pacing is “the most critical tactical determinant of performance” in marathon running, making strategic decision-making just as important as physical fitness.

The findings could influence how coaches and runners prepare for long-distance races. Rather than focusing solely on speed, the study suggests that adopting a realistic race plan and maintaining a consistent pace throughout the event may improve overall performance and reduce the chances of a late-race collapse.

With marathon participation continuing to grow worldwide, the researchers believe a better understanding of pacing strategies could help runners of all abilities achieve stronger and more consistent results.

Health

Study Links Higher Coffee Consumption to Lower Risk of Liver Disease

Published

3 days ago

July 3, 2026

Web Reporter

Regular coffee consumption may help reduce the risk of serious liver diseases, including cirrhosis, liver cancer and liver-related deaths, according to a new study published in the journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The research found that people who consumed higher amounts of coffee, including decaffeinated varieties, were less likely to develop chronic liver conditions than those who drank little or no coffee. The findings add to growing evidence that coffee may play a role in supporting long-term liver health, although researchers stressed that the results do not prove a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

The study examined data from more than 350,000 participants enrolled in the UK Biobank, one of the world’s largest long-term health research projects. None of the participants had cirrhosis or liver cancer at the beginning of the study. Researchers monitored their health over a period of 13 years to assess how coffee consumption affected liver-related outcomes.

According to the findings, participants who drank five or more cups of coffee each day had a 32 percent lower risk of developing cirrhosis than those who consumed little or no coffee. They also recorded a 47 percent lower risk of liver cancer and a 42 percent reduction in deaths linked to liver disease.

Researchers found additional indicators of improved liver health among regular coffee drinkers. Participants with higher coffee intake showed lower levels of liver fat, liver iron, fibrosis and inflammation. Blood tests also revealed increased levels of proteins associated with healthy liver function, while markers linked to liver scarring and inflammation were generally lower.

The findings come as liver disease continues to pose a major global health challenge. A separate study published in 2023 estimated that liver disease causes around two million deaths each year, accounting for about four percent of all deaths worldwide. Men account for nearly two-thirds of those fatalities.

Despite the encouraging results, the researchers urged caution in interpreting the findings. Senior study author Ju Dong Yang said moderate coffee consumption appears to be beneficial for people who already enjoy drinking coffee and tolerate it well.

“Our findings support moderate coffee consumption for people who already enjoy and tolerate it well,” Yang said.

He added that the study does not provide sufficient evidence to recommend that people who do not currently drink coffee should begin doing so solely to reduce their risk of liver disease.

Health experts continue to advise that maintaining a healthy weight, limiting alcohol consumption, eating a balanced diet and managing conditions such as obesity and diabetes remain the most effective ways to reduce the risk of chronic liver disease. Researchers said additional studies are needed to better understand which compounds in coffee may contribute to its potential protective effects.

Health

Lancet Review Finds mRNA Vaccines Safe and Highly Effective, Calls for Wider Global Access

Published

5 days ago

July 1, 2026

Web Reporter

A comprehensive review of data covering billions of administered doses of mRNA vaccines has concluded that the technology remains both safe and highly effective in preventing infectious diseases, with researchers urging governments and health organisations to focus on expanding global access.

The review, published in The Lancet, examined evidence gathered since mRNA vaccines were first deployed on a large scale during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers found that the vaccines continue to provide strong protection against severe illness while serious side effects remain uncommon.

Unlike conventional vaccines, mRNA vaccines work by delivering genetic instructions that enable the body’s cells to produce a harmless viral protein. This process trains the immune system to recognise and respond to future infections without altering a person’s DNA.

According to the review, mRNA vaccines were 87% effective in preventing confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections within 14 to 42 days after vaccination. The vaccines also demonstrated 93% effectiveness in preventing hospital admissions and 94% effectiveness in preventing deaths related to COVID-19 during the same period.

Researchers noted that immunity declines over time, but booster doses restore a significant portion of the lost protection.

The review also assessed vaccine safety across billions of administered doses. It found that serious adverse events, including myocarditis, pericarditis and anaphylaxis, occurred very rarely. Most reported reactions, such as pain at the injection site, fatigue and fever, were mild to moderate and typically resolved within a few days.

“Across billions of administered doses, serious adverse events have been rare, well characterised, and consistently outweighed by the substantial protection conferred against severe disease, hospitalisation, and death,” the researchers wrote.

The review concluded that the vaccines have proven effective across a broad range of populations, including children, older adults, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems.

Researchers also highlighted the growing potential of mRNA technology beyond infectious diseases. They said ongoing research could lead to personalised cancer vaccines designed to match an individual patient’s tumour characteristics, opening new possibilities for targeted treatment.

Co-author Manish Sadarangani of the University of British Columbia and BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute said mRNA vaccines have already changed how the world responds to emerging infectious diseases and could continue to play an important role in preventive medicine and cancer care.

The review also noted that improvements in vaccine storage, including higher-temperature storage methods and freeze-drying technologies, could simplify transportation, reduce waste and improve access in remote regions.

Despite these advances, the researchers stressed that manufacturing capacity and equitable distribution remain major challenges. They called for greater investment in local production, technology transfer and stronger regulatory systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Co-author Robin Shattock of Imperial College London said expanding manufacturing networks and strengthening regional production capabilities would shorten supply chains, lower costs and help ensure countries have faster access to vaccines during future global health emergencies.