Connect with us

Business

Spanish Companies Scale Back Operations in Russia as Trade Plummets Amid Sanctions

Published

on

Spanish companies are steadily withdrawing from Russia and reducing their exposure to the Kremlin as economic sanctions and political tensions continue to mount. Data from the Spanish Chamber of Commerce shows a sharp contraction in bilateral trade, reflecting a broader strategy by Spain to distance itself from the Russian market.

Since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago, the impact on Spanish exporters has been profound. In 2021, Spanish exports to Russia were valued at €2.2 billion. By 2024, that figure had fallen to €783 million—a decline of more than 64%. The number of Spanish firms exporting to Russia has also plunged from around 670 in 2021 to just 158 last year.

Experts attribute the steep decline to the ongoing war in Ukraine and the sweeping sanctions imposed by the European Union and the United States. These restrictions have disrupted supply chains, raised inflation, and limited access to raw materials. The sanctions also curbed Russia’s ability to transfer funds and restricted travel for key business personnel.

The European Union’s July decision to penalise Russian gas imports and block the use of Nord Stream pipelines further strained trade. The United States has also tightened restrictions, imposing new sanctions on major Russian oil producers Rosneft and Lukoil in an effort to pressure the Kremlin toward peace negotiations.

Despite the decline in exports, certain Russian imports into Spain have persisted. Energy remains the largest component of bilateral trade, with liquefied natural gas (LNG) playing a key role. A 2024 report by the Bank of Spain revealed that Russia’s share of Spain’s LNG imports outside the EU rose from 18% in 2022 to 36% by mid-2024. However, by May 2025, that figure had dropped to 13.3% as Spain ramped up LNG imports from the United States.

See also  India–EU Economic Corridor Faces Major Hurdles Despite Bold Vision

Fertiliser imports from Russia, on the other hand, grew sharply in 2024. Data from S&P Global indicated record-high imports of urea and calcium ammonium nitrate, making Russia Spain’s second-largest supplier of nitrogen fertilisers. The trend has raised alarms in Europe over continued dependence on Russian agricultural products, prompting discussions about possible tariffs.

Recent figures underline the ongoing contraction in bilateral trade. Between January and July 2025, Spanish imports from Russia totalled €1.2 billion, down from €1.45 billion during the same period the previous year. Exports also declined from €468 million to €425 million.

According to the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC), Spanish exports to Russia fell by 14.3% in August 2025 compared to the previous year, while imports dropped by 57.7%. The top Spanish exports included perfumes, processed foods, and vaccines, while imports were dominated by petroleum gas, aluminium, and fertilisers.

The OEC’s latest report confirms that trade between Spain and Russia has remained near historic lows since the war began. While limited exchanges continue in sectors such as pharmaceuticals and agri-food products, volumes remain far below pre-2022 levels, marking a decisive shift in Spain’s economic relationship with Russia.

Business

OPEC+ Approves Modest August Oil Output Increase as Crude Prices Retreat

Published

on

Seven members of the OPEC+ alliance have agreed to increase their combined oil production by 188,000 barrels per day in August, adopting a cautious approach as global crude prices continue to fall back to levels seen before the conflict involving Iran disrupted energy markets.

The producers announced the decision on Sunday, saying the output adjustment reflects current market conditions while reaffirming their commitment to maintaining stability in global oil markets.

“The countries will continue to monitor and assess market conditions, and in their continuous efforts to support market stability, they reaffirmed the importance of adopting a cautious approach,” the group said in a statement.

The increase comes after oil prices retreated sharply following months of heightened volatility linked to the conflict in the Middle East. Brent crude, the international benchmark, was trading below $72 per barrel as markets opened on Sunday evening, returning to levels recorded before military action involving Iran earlier this year. US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) was trading at around $68 per barrel.

Oil prices had surged during the height of the conflict, with Brent approaching $120 per barrel amid concerns over disruptions to supplies from the Gulf region. Prices have eased in recent weeks as tensions cooled and shipping activity gradually resumed.

Market sentiment has improved after Iran agreed under an interim understanding to allow commercial vessels to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, while the United States eased restrictions affecting Iranian ports. Even so, negotiations aimed at reaching a broader settlement remain ongoing, and authorities in Tehran have warned that vessels departing from approved routes could face military action.

See also  Warner Bros Discovery Poised to Oppose Paramount’s Hostile Takeover Bid

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes, carrying roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies before the conflict. Although commercial traffic has resumed, shipping volumes have yet to return to normal levels.

During the conflict, many OPEC+ production increases existed largely on paper rather than in actual exports. Limited access through the Strait of Hormuz forced several Gulf producers to reduce physical shipments as storage facilities filled with unsold crude, leaving actual production below official quotas.

As maritime routes gradually reopen, stored oil is returning to international markets, adding to supply and contributing to downward pressure on prices beyond the announced production increase.

Despite improving conditions, analysts believe a full recovery in Gulf oil production will take time. S&P Global Energy has projected that output may not return completely to pre-conflict levels until at least the first quarter of 2027. Industry observers also expect the effects of the disruption on fuel prices and broader inflation to continue even after any permanent political settlement is reached.

The seven OPEC+ producers said they remain prepared to suspend or reverse future output increases if market conditions deteriorate. The alliance is scheduled to meet again on August 2 to review supply levels and assess developments in the global energy market before deciding on production plans for the following month.

Continue Reading

Business

Uzbekistan Accelerates Energy Expansion With Renewables, Grid Upgrades and First Nuclear Plant

Published

on

Uzbekistan is embarking on a major expansion of its electricity sector, aiming to increase annual power generation from 82 billion kilowatt-hours to more than 120 billion kilowatt-hours over the next five years as the country responds to rising demand from industry, population growth and emerging digital industries.

The ambitious target highlights the government’s drive to strengthen energy security while gradually reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Officials see the power sector as a key area for investment, with renewable energy, electricity transmission and nuclear power expected to play central roles in the country’s long-term strategy.

Speaking at the Tashkent International Investment Forum, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev said renewable sources are expected to generate 54% of Uzbekistan’s electricity by 2030. He noted that the country has already attracted nearly $6 billion in foreign investment for green energy projects and plans to invest another $4 billion in modernising electricity transmission networks.

Mirziyoyev also encouraged investment in solar and wind farms, battery energy storage systems, upgraded power grids and green-powered data centres, linking energy development with Uzbekistan’s industrial and digital transformation goals.

International financial institutions are already backing several major projects. In 2025, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) invested nearly $2 billion across 120 projects in Central Asia and Mongolia, with more than $1 billion directed toward Uzbekistan. More than half of the bank’s regional investments were classified as green initiatives, while about one-third supported sustainable infrastructure.

Among its projects in Uzbekistan is a $142 million financing package for a combined one-gigawatt solar photovoltaic plant and a battery storage system with a capacity of 1,336 megawatt-hours, developed alongside ACWA Power. The EBRD has also arranged financing of up to $195.5 million for a 300-megawatt solar facility and a 75-megawatt-hour battery storage project being developed by Masdar in the Kashkadarya region.

See also  Warner Bros Discovery Poised to Oppose Paramount’s Hostile Takeover Bid

EBRD Managing Director for Central Asia and Mongolia Huseyin Ozhan said expanding energy capacity requires both financial investment and policy reforms. He said governments across the region have adopted long-term decarbonisation plans, with international institutions helping develop roadmaps to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

Ozhan said renewable energy remains the primary pathway for lowering carbon emissions while meeting growing electricity demand. He added that modern energy systems require not only new power plants but also battery storage, stronger grid connections and supportive regulations to attract private investment.

Alongside renewable energy, Uzbekistan has begun developing its first nuclear power project. Construction started in June in the Jizzakh region, where the planned facility will feature two large reactors with capacities of about 1,000 megawatts each, along with two small modular reactors of around 55 megawatts.

World Nuclear Association Director General Sama Bilbao y León said the project reflects a broader trend among rapidly growing economies seeking dependable low-carbon electricity. She noted that about 75% of Uzbekistan’s electricity currently comes from natural gas and said nuclear power will help diversify the country’s energy mix while allowing greater use of natural gas in other sectors of the economy.

Continue Reading

Business

Big Tech Giants Lose $2.3 Trillion in June as Investors Shift Beyond AI Leaders

Published

on

The world’s largest technology companies endured their weakest monthly performance in years during June, as investors pulled back from the artificial intelligence-driven rally that had dominated global markets and shifted their attention toward a broader range of companies.

The so-called “Magnificent Seven” — Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Tesla — collectively lost about $2.3 trillion in market value during the month, marking a sharp reversal after leading Wall Street’s gains for more than three years.

Microsoft recorded one of the steepest declines, falling about 17 percent, its worst monthly performance since December 2000. Amazon dropped roughly 12 percent, Meta lost around 11 percent, while Nvidia and Alphabet declined by more than 5 percent each.

Apple reached a record closing price of $315.20 early in June before retreating more than 10 percent from its peak by month-end. Tesla experienced a volatile month, falling more than 6 percent during the first week before recovering most of those losses to finish the month nearly unchanged.

The decline comes as investors question whether the enormous spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure will generate sufficient returns. Major technology firms have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to expanding AI data centres and purchasing advanced semiconductors, driving up costs across the industry.

The world’s largest technology companies remain the biggest buyers of high-performance memory chips used in AI systems, contributing to supply shortages and soaring prices. Memory chip manufacturer Micron Technology recently reported earnings per share of $24.67 for its latest quarter, compared with $1.68 a year earlier, reflecting strong demand across the sector.

See also  India–EU Economic Corridor Faces Major Hurdles Despite Bold Vision

Industry data also showed prices for DRAM memory chips, widely used in computers, smartphones and AI servers, surged by as much as 98 percent during the first quarter, increasing operating costs for companies investing heavily in artificial intelligence.

While the largest technology stocks struggled, much of the broader market continued to perform strongly. According to market analysts, companies outside the Magnificent Seven posted earnings growth of 17.5 percent during the first quarter, supported in part by semiconductor manufacturers and other technology suppliers benefiting from AI demand.

Analysts expect earnings growth among the remaining S&P 500 companies to exceed 20 percent in the second quarter, while forecasts for the Magnificent Seven have moderated. By the end of June, the S&P 493 Index, which excludes the seven technology giants, had gained 13.7 percent for the year, compared with a 6.6 percent decline for the Magnificent Seven. The broader S&P 500 Index advanced 7.4 percent over the same period.

Market observers say investors are becoming more selective, shifting their focus from AI infrastructure providers to companies expected to benefit from the technology’s wider adoption.

Despite the recent sell-off, the Magnificent Seven continue to deliver strong financial results, with estimated first-quarter earnings growth of about 29 percent. Analysts believe the group will remain influential in the technology sector, although investors are increasingly demanding clearer evidence that massive AI investments will translate into sustained profits.

Continue Reading

Trending