Connect with us

News

Space Emerges as the Next Battleground in Global Power Struggle

Published

on

As conflicts on Earth intensify, space is rapidly becoming the newest frontier in the fight for global dominance. From hijacked satellites to the development of space-based weapons, experts warn that the risks of militarisation beyond Earth are growing at an unprecedented pace.

The issue came into sharp focus earlier this year when hackers supportive of Moscow hijacked a satellite that broadcasts television signals to Ukraine. Instead of regular programming, Ukrainian viewers were shown live coverage of Russia’s Victory Day parade in Moscow, complete with tanks, soldiers, and weapons. The move, analysts say, was a deliberate attempt to intimidate and a stark reminder that warfare now extends into cyberspace and outer space.

Satellites: A Critical Weakness
With more than 12,000 satellites currently orbiting Earth, these systems underpin everything from navigation and intelligence gathering to global communications and economic supply chains. They also serve as early-warning systems for missile launches. But their importance makes them a prime target.

Cyberattacks often exploit weaknesses not in the satellites themselves but in outdated ground-based software and communications systems. In 2022, a cyberattack on Viasat, a U.S.-based satellite provider used by Ukraine, caused widespread outages across Europe. Kyiv blamed the incident on Moscow.

“Disabling a satellite without firing a shot can deliver a devastating blow,” said Tom Pace, chief executive of cybersecurity firm NetRise.

Growing Fears of Space Weapons
U.S. officials now warn that Russia is developing a nuclear-based anti-satellite weapon capable of destroying nearly all satellites in low-Earth orbit. Such a device would violate international treaties and could cripple communications, navigation, and security systems worldwide.

Representative Mike Turner, a senior member of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, compared the potential deployment of such a weapon to the launch of Sputnik in 1957, calling it “the Cuban Missile Crisis in space.” He warned that if used, it could render parts of space unusable for at least a year.

See also  Russia Launches Massive Overnight Barrage on Ukraine as Peace Talks With U.S. Continue

While the weapon is not yet operational, experts fear that its very development marks a dangerous escalation in the militarisation of space.

Race to the Moon and Beyond
Beyond immediate security threats, competition is also mounting over resources in space. The Moon, believed to be rich in helium-3—a potential future fuel for nuclear fusion—has become a key focus. The United States has announced plans to deploy a small nuclear reactor on the lunar surface, while Russia and China have announced similar projects.

“This isn’t science fiction; it’s quickly becoming reality,” said Joseph Rooke, a London-based cybersecurity expert. “Whichever country dominates energy sources from space could secure economic and political dominance on Earth.”

China, however, has pushed back against accusations of fuelling an arms race. “It is the U.S. that is militarising space,” said Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for China’s embassy in Washington.

With satellites under threat and lunar resources in sight, the competition for dominance is shifting skyward, raising fears that the next great geopolitical conflict could be fought far above the Earth’s surface.

News

EU Must End ‘Naivety’ on Trade and Confront China’s Industrial Strategy, Says French Minister

Published

on

France’s Minister for Foreign Trade, Nicolas Forissier, has called on the European Union to abandon what he described as “naivety” in its approach to global trade, urging a tougher stance on countries accused of distorting markets through industrial policy and trade practices.

Speaking in an interview with Euronews’ 12 Minutes With programme, Forissier said Europe must respond more firmly to what he described as the weaponisation of trade dependencies, warning that China in particular could damage its own long-term interests by undermining European industry.

“The Chinese have to understand that they won’t win anything if they destroy the European industry and then the European market, which is an essential market for them,” he said. “We must no longer be naive.”

His comments come as the European Commission prepares to hold an “orientation debate” next week on how to respond to a surge of low-cost Chinese imports. The discussion is expected to shape possible new trade defence measures, with further talks likely when EU leaders meet in Brussels in mid-June.

Forissier said the shift in thinking was not limited to China alone but applied to any country using commercial leverage to gain strategic advantage. “It is not only China,” he said. “It is all the countries that weaponise trade.”

Among the proposals under consideration is a requirement for EU companies to diversify supply chains, sourcing components from at least three different suppliers in order to reduce dependency on any single foreign market. Asked whether he supported such a measure, Forissier replied: “Yes, we have to.”

See also  Cities Worldwide Gear Up for Spectacular New Year Celebrations

Other options include targeted tariffs on sensitive industries such as chemicals, alongside stronger use of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tools to counter imports priced below domestic market levels. These measures are designed to address concerns over overcapacity in China’s industrial sector and its impact on European manufacturers.

The debate is taking place against a backdrop of widening trade imbalances. EU goods imports from China exceeded exports by €359.3 billion in 2025, marking an increase of nearly 20% compared with the previous year.

China has already warned it could retaliate if the bloc imposes new restrictions, raising concerns about potential escalation in trade tensions between two of the world’s largest economies.

France has repeatedly pushed for a more assertive European trade policy, arguing that state subsidies, export controls on raw materials and industrial overproduction in major economies are distorting global markets.

Forissier stressed that Europe must maintain open dialogue with Beijing while defending its own industrial base. “We try to respect the Chinese,” he said. “The Chinese have to respect us, and this is the message European institutions have to send.”

Continue Reading

News

US Says Iran Talks ‘Borderline’ as Pakistan Pushes Diplomacy Amid War Tensions

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has said ongoing negotiations over the conflict involving Iran are teetering on the “borderline” between reaching a diplomatic agreement and a return to renewed military strikes, as tensions continue to rise across the region.

The remarks came as Pakistan’s army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran for fresh talks aimed at de-escalating the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. His visit follows a series of high-level diplomatic engagements involving Pakistani officials and Iranian leadership in recent days.

Munir was received in Tehran by Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, alongside Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who has also travelled to the Iranian capital multiple times this week for meetings with senior officials.

Despite the renewed diplomatic activity, Iran has downplayed expectations of a breakthrough. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the visit did not signal any decisive shift in negotiations, describing the differences between the parties as “deep and extensive,” according to Iran’s ISNA news agency.

Speaking at a NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there had been limited progress in the discussions but cautioned against optimism.

“There’s a little bit of movement and that’s good,” Rubio said, adding that he did not want to exaggerate developments. He also warned that Washington retains “other options” if diplomacy fails, echoing Trump’s earlier comments that military action remains on the table if Iran does not agree to terms.

Trump has previously stated that he paused consideration of a strike due to what he described as “serious negotiations” taking place, but has repeatedly warned that the fragile ceasefire reached in mid-April could collapse.

See also  Europe Forms ‘Coalition of the Willing’ to Support Ukraine Amid Uncertainty Over U.S. Role

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran remained committed to talks despite what he called repeated breaches of diplomacy by Washington. He said Iran was participating “with a responsible approach and with all seriousness” in an effort to secure what he described as a fair outcome, according to Iranian state media.

A key point of contention remains the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime route through which a significant share of global oil and gas supplies pass. Iranian actions in the waterway and US responses have heightened fears of wider economic disruption.

Iran has effectively restricted access through the strait, while US Central Command has reportedly blocked Iranian ports and redirected commercial vessels since mid-April. The European Union has since expanded its sanctions framework targeting those involved, calling the blockade contrary to international law.

Rubio said allied nations were also discussing contingency plans in case negotiations fail, warning that the situation may require a “plan B” if diplomatic efforts collapse.

Continue Reading

News

US Green Card Rule Change Forces Most Applicants to Apply From Abroad

Published

on

A sweeping policy change in the United States has upended a long-standing immigration process, requiring most foreign nationals seeking green cards to leave the country and complete their applications from abroad.

Under the new directive issued Friday by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), individuals in the United States on temporary visas — including work, student and tourist permits — will generally no longer be able to adjust their status to permanent residency while remaining in the country. Instead, they must return to their home countries and apply through US consulates, except in limited “extraordinary circumstances.”

USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said the policy was intended to realign the immigration system with its original framework.

“From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances,” Kahler said. He added that the change would reduce incentives for people to remain in the US after visa denials.

The decision marks a significant departure from decades of practice, under which many migrants have been allowed to apply for permanent residency from within the United States. That pathway has been commonly used by spouses of US citizens, workers, students, and individuals with family ties in the country.

The process of obtaining a green card often takes months or even years, raising concerns that applicants may now be forced to leave jobs, homes and families while waiting for approval abroad.

Immigration attorneys and advocacy groups said they were still assessing the scope of the policy and how it would be enforced. Many also warned that practical barriers could make compliance difficult, particularly for applicants from countries where travel is restricted or where US consular services are limited or unavailable.

See also  M23 Rebels Enter Bukavu as Conflict in Eastern DR Congo Intensifies

Shev Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association said the move appeared to disrupt established procedures. “USCIS is trying to upend decades of processing of adjustment of status,” she said, noting widespread uncertainty over who would be affected.

Jessie De Haven of the California Immigration Project said the policy could discourage eligible applicants from proceeding altogether. “It’s really hard to tell how this is going to be applied,” she said. “I do think it might have a chilling effect on people applying.”

The announcement forms part of a broader immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, which has sought to tighten legal pathways while increasing enforcement measures against irregular migration.

Officials have framed the change as an effort to close loopholes and strengthen oversight of the immigration system. Critics, however, argue it could lead to prolonged separations for families and create new obstacles for lawful immigrants seeking permanent residency in the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending