Connect with us

News

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer Signals Willingness to Send Peacekeeping Troops to Ukraine

Published

on

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has for the first time publicly stated that he would be willing to send UK troops to Ukraine as part of a European peacekeeping force, should a deal be reached with Moscow requiring such an arrangement.

His remarks, made in an op-ed for The Daily Telegraph on Sunday, come just ahead of an emergency meeting of European leaders in Paris, where discussions are expected to focus on the shifting geopolitical landscape following recent statements by the Trump administration regarding US involvement in Ukraine.

UK’s Commitment to Ukraine’s Security

In his op-ed, Starmer acknowledged the risks of deploying British troops, saying it would mean “putting them in harm’s way.” However, he described the situation as an “existential” issue for Europe and a “once in a generation moment” that required decisive action.

He reiterated the UK’s long-term commitment to Ukraine, pledging to maintain £3 billion (€3.6bn) in annual military aid until 2030 and positioning Britain as a key leader in European defence and security efforts.

European Response to US Policy Shift

Starmer’s comments come in the wake of a series of statements by senior officials in the new Trump administration, which have raised concerns among European allies about Washington’s long-term commitment to Ukraine.

Last week, US President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth suggested that America would scale back its defence commitments in Europe, while US Special Envoy on Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellogg stated that Europe would likely be excluded from upcoming peace talks between Russia and Ukraine.

These remarks have left European leaders scrambling to determine their role in shaping a potential peace deal, as the US and Russian delegations prepare for talks in Saudi Arabia this week.

See also  London Ambulances Targeted in Suspected Antisemitic Arson Attack

Growing Support for European Peacekeeping Force

The idea of a European-led peacekeeping mission in Ukraine is not new. It was first suggested by French President Emmanuel Macron in early 2024, when he refused to rule out deploying French troops. Since then, the concept has gained traction, though details remain scarce on what such a force would look like, which nations would participate, and under what conditions troops would be deployed.

The composition and role of the force would largely depend on the terms of a potential peace agreement, the status of the frontline, and the presence of Ukrainian and Russian troops on the ground.

Calls for Increased Defence Spending in Europe

In his op-ed, Starmer echoed growing calls from US and EU officials urging European nations to increase defence spending and take on a greater role within NATO.

Currently, eight of NATO’s 30 European members have yet to meet the alliance’s target of spending 2% of GDP on defence. The UK currently allocates 2.3% of its GDP to defence, with plans to increase this to 2.5%, though Starmer’s Labour government has not yet provided a clear timeline for achieving this goal.

Paris Summit and European Unity

Monday’s emergency meeting in Paris will see Starmer join leaders from Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Denmark, along with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.

The summit is expected to focus on coordinating Europe’s response to the evolving US stance, the potential formation of a European-led peacekeeping force, and broader discussions on strengthening European defence capabilities in light of shifting global alliances.

News

EU Must End ‘Naivety’ on Trade and Confront China’s Industrial Strategy, Says French Minister

Published

on

France’s Minister for Foreign Trade, Nicolas Forissier, has called on the European Union to abandon what he described as “naivety” in its approach to global trade, urging a tougher stance on countries accused of distorting markets through industrial policy and trade practices.

Speaking in an interview with Euronews’ 12 Minutes With programme, Forissier said Europe must respond more firmly to what he described as the weaponisation of trade dependencies, warning that China in particular could damage its own long-term interests by undermining European industry.

“The Chinese have to understand that they won’t win anything if they destroy the European industry and then the European market, which is an essential market for them,” he said. “We must no longer be naive.”

His comments come as the European Commission prepares to hold an “orientation debate” next week on how to respond to a surge of low-cost Chinese imports. The discussion is expected to shape possible new trade defence measures, with further talks likely when EU leaders meet in Brussels in mid-June.

Forissier said the shift in thinking was not limited to China alone but applied to any country using commercial leverage to gain strategic advantage. “It is not only China,” he said. “It is all the countries that weaponise trade.”

Among the proposals under consideration is a requirement for EU companies to diversify supply chains, sourcing components from at least three different suppliers in order to reduce dependency on any single foreign market. Asked whether he supported such a measure, Forissier replied: “Yes, we have to.”

See also  Nvidia Executive: Humanoid Robots Are the Next Frontier in AI, and They're Coming Soon

Other options include targeted tariffs on sensitive industries such as chemicals, alongside stronger use of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tools to counter imports priced below domestic market levels. These measures are designed to address concerns over overcapacity in China’s industrial sector and its impact on European manufacturers.

The debate is taking place against a backdrop of widening trade imbalances. EU goods imports from China exceeded exports by €359.3 billion in 2025, marking an increase of nearly 20% compared with the previous year.

China has already warned it could retaliate if the bloc imposes new restrictions, raising concerns about potential escalation in trade tensions between two of the world’s largest economies.

France has repeatedly pushed for a more assertive European trade policy, arguing that state subsidies, export controls on raw materials and industrial overproduction in major economies are distorting global markets.

Forissier stressed that Europe must maintain open dialogue with Beijing while defending its own industrial base. “We try to respect the Chinese,” he said. “The Chinese have to respect us, and this is the message European institutions have to send.”

Continue Reading

News

US Says Iran Talks ‘Borderline’ as Pakistan Pushes Diplomacy Amid War Tensions

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has said ongoing negotiations over the conflict involving Iran are teetering on the “borderline” between reaching a diplomatic agreement and a return to renewed military strikes, as tensions continue to rise across the region.

The remarks came as Pakistan’s army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir arrived in Tehran for fresh talks aimed at de-escalating the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. His visit follows a series of high-level diplomatic engagements involving Pakistani officials and Iranian leadership in recent days.

Munir was received in Tehran by Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, alongside Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who has also travelled to the Iranian capital multiple times this week for meetings with senior officials.

Despite the renewed diplomatic activity, Iran has downplayed expectations of a breakthrough. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the visit did not signal any decisive shift in negotiations, describing the differences between the parties as “deep and extensive,” according to Iran’s ISNA news agency.

Speaking at a NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in Sweden, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there had been limited progress in the discussions but cautioned against optimism.

“There’s a little bit of movement and that’s good,” Rubio said, adding that he did not want to exaggerate developments. He also warned that Washington retains “other options” if diplomacy fails, echoing Trump’s earlier comments that military action remains on the table if Iran does not agree to terms.

Trump has previously stated that he paused consideration of a strike due to what he described as “serious negotiations” taking place, but has repeatedly warned that the fragile ceasefire reached in mid-April could collapse.

See also  California Rescuers Recover Final Victim of Deadly Sierra Nevada Avalanche

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran remained committed to talks despite what he called repeated breaches of diplomacy by Washington. He said Iran was participating “with a responsible approach and with all seriousness” in an effort to secure what he described as a fair outcome, according to Iranian state media.

A key point of contention remains the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime route through which a significant share of global oil and gas supplies pass. Iranian actions in the waterway and US responses have heightened fears of wider economic disruption.

Iran has effectively restricted access through the strait, while US Central Command has reportedly blocked Iranian ports and redirected commercial vessels since mid-April. The European Union has since expanded its sanctions framework targeting those involved, calling the blockade contrary to international law.

Rubio said allied nations were also discussing contingency plans in case negotiations fail, warning that the situation may require a “plan B” if diplomatic efforts collapse.

Continue Reading

News

US Green Card Rule Change Forces Most Applicants to Apply From Abroad

Published

on

A sweeping policy change in the United States has upended a long-standing immigration process, requiring most foreign nationals seeking green cards to leave the country and complete their applications from abroad.

Under the new directive issued Friday by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), individuals in the United States on temporary visas — including work, student and tourist permits — will generally no longer be able to adjust their status to permanent residency while remaining in the country. Instead, they must return to their home countries and apply through US consulates, except in limited “extraordinary circumstances.”

USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said the policy was intended to realign the immigration system with its original framework.

“From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances,” Kahler said. He added that the change would reduce incentives for people to remain in the US after visa denials.

The decision marks a significant departure from decades of practice, under which many migrants have been allowed to apply for permanent residency from within the United States. That pathway has been commonly used by spouses of US citizens, workers, students, and individuals with family ties in the country.

The process of obtaining a green card often takes months or even years, raising concerns that applicants may now be forced to leave jobs, homes and families while waiting for approval abroad.

Immigration attorneys and advocacy groups said they were still assessing the scope of the policy and how it would be enforced. Many also warned that practical barriers could make compliance difficult, particularly for applicants from countries where travel is restricted or where US consular services are limited or unavailable.

See also  Russia Accused of Over 2,900 Ceasefire Violations During Easter Truce, Says Zelenskyy

Shev Dalal-Dheini of the American Immigration Lawyers Association said the move appeared to disrupt established procedures. “USCIS is trying to upend decades of processing of adjustment of status,” she said, noting widespread uncertainty over who would be affected.

Jessie De Haven of the California Immigration Project said the policy could discourage eligible applicants from proceeding altogether. “It’s really hard to tell how this is going to be applied,” she said. “I do think it might have a chilling effect on people applying.”

The announcement forms part of a broader immigration crackdown under the Trump administration, which has sought to tighten legal pathways while increasing enforcement measures against irregular migration.

Officials have framed the change as an effort to close loopholes and strengthen oversight of the immigration system. Critics, however, argue it could lead to prolonged separations for families and create new obstacles for lawful immigrants seeking permanent residency in the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending