Connect with us

News

Russia Moves to Block WhatsApp as Kremlin Pushes State-Controlled Messaging

Published

on


Russia has attempted to fully block access to WhatsApp, the Meta-owned messaging app, as the Kremlin seeks tighter control over its internet space. WhatsApp described the move as an effort to isolate over 100 million users from private and secure communication, calling it a “backwards step” that could reduce safety for people in Russia.

The push for greater control comes amid a broader crackdown on dissent during the ongoing war in Ukraine. Meta platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, have been officially banned in Russia, accessible only through virtual private networks (VPNs). Reports about the Kremlin targeting WhatsApp have circulated for years, with speculation dating back to the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022.

The Russian government has also promoted its own messaging app, Max, which WhatsApp called “a state-owned surveillance app.” Moscow has mandated that Max be pre-installed on all new devices sold in the country since 2025, and public sector employees, teachers, and students are required to use the platform.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told state-controlled media that Meta is being blamed for failing to comply with Russian regulations governing WhatsApp. He said the company could reach an agreement by negotiating with authorities, but added that if it refuses to comply, access to its services would remain blocked.

Earlier this week, Russia also began restricting Telegram, another popular messaging service. Pavel Durov, Telegram’s founder, said the restrictions are intended to push users toward a state-controlled platform designed for surveillance and political censorship. Durov compared Russia’s approach to Iran’s attempt eight years ago to ban Telegram, which ultimately failed.

See also  Biden Blasts Trump Over Social Security Cuts in First Major Post-Presidency Speech

Durov, who left Russia for Dubai in 2014 after refusing Kremlin demands to close opposition groups on his VK platform, has a complicated relationship with the Russian government. Investigations show he visited Russia more than 50 times between 2015 and 2021, and he was detained in France in August 2024 over a probe into criminal activity on Telegram, raising questions about his neutrality.

Moscow has cited foreign tech firms’ refusal to store Russian users’ data domestically as a key concern. The country’s Data Localisation Law, introduced in 2015, requires all personal data of Russian users to be stored on servers within Russia. Regulations tightened after the invasion of Ukraine, and from 1 January 2026, all internet services operating in Russia must store user messages—including audio, video, text, and metadata—for three years and provide them to security agencies upon request, even if users have deleted them.

Critics and rights groups argue that these measures are part of a broader effort to expand surveillance and control over internet use, suppress dissent, and monitor public communications. They warn that forcing millions of users onto state-controlled platforms will erode digital privacy and limit access to independent channels of information.

The attempt to block WhatsApp and restrict Telegram marks the latest step in Russia’s increasingly stringent regulation of online communications, raising concerns about the future of digital freedom in the country.

News

US Sanctions Cuban Oil Company Escalate Tensions Amid Deepening Energy Crisis

Published

on

The United States has imposed new sanctions on Cuba’s state-owned oil and gas company Cupet, a move that is expected to further strain already fragile relations between Washington and Havana and deepen the island’s ongoing energy crisis.

The announcement was made on Thursday by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said the measures target key assets of Cupet that he claimed were “unlawfully expropriated from American owners years ago.” The decision comes as Cuba continues to grapple with severe fuel shortages, rolling blackouts, and a strained national grid that has struggled for years under limited investment and reduced oil imports.

Rubio accused Cuban authorities of “weaponising energy” and using fuel distribution as a tool of political control. He alleged, without providing evidence, that government officials divert scarce energy supplies for military and security use while rationing fuel for the general population. He also said Cuban officials were reselling fuel on secondary markets, further worsening shortages on the island.

The Cuban government has not issued an immediate response to the latest sanctions. In previous statements, it has consistently argued that US restrictions are designed to cripple the economy and place pressure on ordinary citizens rather than the political leadership.

Cupet, which oversees Cuba’s fuel imports, refining, and distribution, operates in a heavily restricted environment. Fuel sales to the public have been severely limited in recent months, with rationing becoming widespread as the country faces one of its worst energy shortages in years.

The sanctions follow earlier US measures targeting Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel and other senior officials, further expanding Washington’s pressure campaign on the island’s leadership. US officials have framed the actions as part of a broader effort to push for political and economic change in Cuba.

See also  Researchers Question Effectiveness of 'Carbon Footprint' Concept

Energy shortages in Cuba have worsened over the past five years, driven by aging infrastructure, reduced foreign oil supplies, and tighter international financial constraints. The situation has resulted in frequent power outages, disruptions to public transport, and shortages of essential goods.

Some analysts say the new sanctions could intensify humanitarian challenges on the island. Critics also argue that restricting access to energy infrastructure may complicate efforts by private operators and humanitarian suppliers who rely on state-controlled systems to distribute fuel.

US officials, however, maintain that the measures are aimed at limiting what they describe as the Cuban government’s misuse of resources and its control over strategic sectors of the economy.

With tensions rising and diplomatic engagement limited, the latest sanctions mark another escalation in a long-running standoff between the two countries, with no immediate sign of de-escalation.

Continue Reading

News

Trump Welcomes Rising Inflation Data as Energy Prices Surge Amid Iran Conflict

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has reacted unexpectedly to new economic data showing that inflation in the United States rose to an annual rate of 4.2% in May, saying during a White House briefing that he “loved the inflation” and describing the figures as “great.”

The latest rise in consumer prices comes as the ongoing conflict with Iran continues to disrupt global energy markets. Inflation has accelerated steadily since the beginning of the year, climbing from 2.4% in February, before the outbreak of hostilities, to 3.3% in March and 3.8% in April. The sharpest pressures have come from energy costs following turmoil in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and gas shipments.

Speaking to reporters, Trump dismissed concerns over rising prices and suggested that the United States was managing energy flows through covert operations in the region. He claimed Washington had been “taking out millions of barrels of oil” and referred to undisclosed naval activity in the Gulf. He also said oil prices, currently around $85 per barrel, reflected the impact of recent military actions.

The president, who campaigned on bringing down inflation, acknowledged that the conflict had affected financial markets but maintained that the consequences were justified. He reiterated his position that military action was necessary, arguing that Iran was close to acquiring nuclear weapons. “We have to go and attack,” he said, defending the decision to escalate involvement in the region.

According to official data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, energy prices have risen 23.5% over the past year, while gasoline costs have surged by 40.5%, placing additional pressure on households and businesses.

See also  Israel Delays Palestinian Prisoner Release, Putting Ceasefire at Risk

The economic impact is expected to remain a key issue ahead of November’s midterm elections, where voters will decide control of Congress. Rising living costs are already shaping political debate, with critics warning that higher prices could erode household purchasing power.

Among those responding to Trump’s remarks was Senator Bernie Sanders, who criticised the administration’s handling of inflation. In a social media post, he argued that working families were bearing the brunt of rising costs, particularly for fuel, groceries and essential goods, and blamed government policy for worsening economic pressures.

As inflation continues to climb, attention is expected to remain focused on how the administration balances military strategy abroad with economic stability at home.

Continue Reading

News

Trump Abruptly Ends NBC Interview After Clash Over 2020 Election Claims

Published

on

US President Donald Trump abruptly ended a televised interview with NBC after a heated exchange over his repeated claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election, walking out mid-conversation during a segment that aired over the weekend.

The interview, conducted on Friday and filmed at a farm in Wisconsin, was set against a rural backdrop featuring a tractor and hay bales as Trump spoke to local farmers. The setting was repeatedly disrupted by heavy rain and strong winds, with audio interference making parts of the conversation difficult to follow.

At several points, Trump reacted to the weather conditions, asking, “Is that wind or what?” and later commenting on the sound of thunder, lightning and rain as it intensified outside. Despite the interruptions, host Kristen Welker attempted to continue the discussion, checking with production staff about whether to pause.

Tensions escalated when the conversation turned to Trump’s past claims about election integrity. When challenged, Trump rejected the line of questioning and accused the broadcaster of bias, saying, “You’re a one-sided, crooked network. Sorry. Let’s call it quits because I’ve had enough.”

He then stood up and left the interview, which was being conducted with Kristen Welker for the programme Meet the Press.

Before walking out, Trump also responded to questions on foreign policy, including the situation involving Iran and broader US military strategy. He defended his administration’s defence posture, stating, “Why would I have built the strongest military in the world?” while insisting he did not support prolonged wars.

The exchange became increasingly tense when Welker questioned Trump about a proposed taxpayer-funded initiative aimed at compensating individuals he claims were unfairly targeted during the Biden administration. Trump defended the idea, while also attacking what he described as “fake” and “crooked” media coverage.

See also  Israel Delays Palestinian Prisoner Release, Putting Ceasefire at Risk

Welker pushed back, stating there was no evidence supporting some of the claims raised. Trump repeated his assertion that the 2020 election had been “rigged” and also suggested without evidence that recent political contests had been compromised.

As the interview deteriorated, Trump said, “You are either crooked or you’re stupid,” before exiting the camera frame while Welker attempted to continue the exchange.

Following the incident, Welker told viewers that she had spoken with Trump the next day regarding the weather disruptions during filming, and that he had indicated willingness to participate in another interview at a later date.

Continue Reading

Trending